Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excellent news.
For those who are doubting if it is 6 launch vehicles or six systems, look at the total number of radars we have bought til date! The number clearly suggest that these are 6 SYSTEMS. Normally a HQ-16 battery consist of 4 launch vehicles, a radar and C&C vehicle.
This is a great purchase indeed.
Well, it suppose to, according to channel 2 , it defeated a cruise missile that simulate yakhontcan you provide a link or an image/video prove that BARAK 8 can intercept air to air missiles thank you sir
This is definitely great but whart about long range SAMs. We definitely lack on this front.
It will be fine by me if we plug all holes in Low to Med category first and then move to fewer numbers of Long range SAM as well. First a good med/Low level air defense net is essential and that is what is being worked on. Once that is all done and in place we can always select some long range missile system in limited numbers.This is definitely great but whart about long range SAMs. We definitely lack on this front.
trolling and sarcasm bro.anti missile is not for intercept air to air missiles but build for ballistic missiles and cruise missile, name me one SAM of the world that can intercept air to air missile
can you stop trolling and discuss it properly?trolling and sarcasm bro.
no sir you don't understand my point, i am asking air to air missiles not anti ship missiles or UAVWell, it suppose to, according to channel 2 , it defeated a cruise missile that simulate yakhont
http://www.mako.co.il/news-military...41004.htm?sCh=3d385dd2dd5d4110&pId=1898243326
also, according the company's promotion video, it clearly shows that it should counter such threads
Also, Important note that, while Iron dome is an anti missile battery, it also counters drones
This is definitely great but whart about long range SAMs. We definitely lack on this front.
Nothing concrete on long range SAM. Just mentions interest,
http://missilethreat.com/defense-systems/ft-2000/
But sir he said that we had inducted HQ-9 long time ago and you said we have been negotiating it, i am just saying that it is just a rumors nothing else
Pakistan is also negotiating with the Chinese government to purchase its HQ-16 and HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles. Senior official in Pakistan told the Kanwa Defense Review that the only obstacles standing between Pakistan and China signing a contract is the current price of the missiles.
Pakistan is ready to make a decision over the procurement of new Chinese air defense systems once it receives a complete sales proposal, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said during a high-level meeting with senior Chinese officials last Friday in Islamabad, according to a press release issued by the Pakistani Prime Minister’s Office.
“The Prime Minister said that the decision for induction of Air Defense System in Pakistan by CPMIEC would be finalized after receipt of complete proposal from the Chinese side.
Excellent news.
For those who are doubting if it is 6 launch vehicles or six systems, look at the total number of radars we have bought til date! The number clearly suggest that these are 6 SYSTEMS. Normally a HQ-16 battery consist of 4 launch vehicles, a radar and C&C vehicle.
This is a great purchase indeed.
We have 10 batteries of Spada SAM too. They are also medium range SAM's i guess.
Since when SAM or anti missile systems purpose is to intercept air to air missiles, that's absurd and stupidcan you stop trolling and discuss it properly?
no sir you don't understand my point, i am asking air to air missiles not anti ship missiles or UAV
Silly post. One SAM doesn't counter another. A SAM counters aircraft and other flying objects. Whether LY-80 is fitting, depend on what other systems Pakistan has, and the air threat, not on what India has in terms of SAMs.Interesting.But LY-80 has a range of 45km, how will they counter India's Barak-8 SAM with a range of 90km?
In which case the proper comparison is moving toward HQ9India version will probably be 150 km
I know naval surface to air missiles that can kill an incoming 4,5" artillery round (Sea Wolf). I'm sure that if e.g. a semi-active radar homing missile like the Sparrow were used to shoot at a Sea Wolf equipped ship, the system would have no problem knocking it down.anti missile is not for intercept air to air missiles but build for ballistic missiles and cruise missile, name me one SAM of the world that can intercept air to air missile
They are SHORADS (10-20km)We have 10 batteries of Spada SAM too. They are also medium range SAM's i guess.
Anti missile batteries should have no problem to face long range air to air missilesI know naval surface to air missiles that can kill an incoming 4,5" artillery round (Sea Wolf). I'm sure that if e.g. a semi-active radar homing missile like the Sparrow were used to shoot at a Sea Wolf equipped ship, the system would have no problem knocking it down.
Ah, a miracle weapon.Barak 8
Anti missile batteries should have no problem to face long range air to air missiles
Don't bring off topic discussion plz ......Anti missile batteries should have no problem to face long range air to air missiles
Neither Barak-8 not Iron Dome has been used against AIR TO AIR missiles (i.e. those carried by one aircraft against another aircraft). It is silly to claim this: why would a groundbased surface to air missile system be used for such a purpose - interfering with one aircraft attempting to kill another with a missile - in the first place (try picturing an actual scenario in which this would happen)?Well, it suppose to, according to channel 2 , it defeated a cruise missile that simulate yakhont
http://www.mako.co.il/news-military...41004.htm?sCh=3d385dd2dd5d4110&pId=1898243326
also, according the company's promotion video, it clearly shows that it should counter such threads
Also, Important note that, while Iron dome is an anti missile battery, it also counters drones