Patriot
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2008
- Messages
- 7,713
- Reaction score
- 0
1) Yes, its unarmed UAV used for mainly intelligence gathering and battle field view.The role of UAV is different and i am quite it would be much cheaper then other viws.
I dont feel any excitement as you guys are feeling!!
Here are the reasons:
1) Falco UAV is old news, a light weight UAV without weapons capability! The most important thing for a modern UAV is to be able to carry atleast a small payload. Falco cannot do this.
2) There were many other options that the PAF could have spent its money on rather than this UAV. There are many Pakistani companies producing indigenous UAVs, if PAF had spent only one million or less they could have gotten a UAV far better than Falco, an in less money.
3) The tech level of the company is not worthy either, an investment in one of our own companies would have been more wise.
4) The wingspan of Falco is painfully small, a good UAV is actually a glider capable bird. just look at a Predator and you'll know what I mean. The lift ratio, the hours of flight get extremely large with a good wingspan.
5) It seem like an urgent action, looking for something to acquire without thinking of its relevance by today's requirements. We do not require a small weaponless UAV that has no radar evading capability nor can carry weapons. We need, both a surveillance and offensive capable system and radar evasion would be a plus.
2)These Uav's are far better then anything Pakistani Companies have made.
3)I disagree this company is one of the leading company in Radar's and other aeronautical stuff.Hell, it also produces AESA Radar.
5)It does have a radar as well as Optical Sensor system.Read the whole information about it on internet.