Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The move does make sense if you are a Pakistani but like I said deporting without a warning is a bit harsh
I believe another formulation of this is called the Stalingrad option -- it is when two people are in a loose loose proportion but one party's loss is much greater than the others. The calculus is that being rational actors the one with the steeper loss will choose to cut his losses.
All these India goodies are like drugs from a drug dealer -- once you are hooked you are his bitch -- India has no organic/sustainable traction in Afghanistan. The subsidized flights, the visas can evaporate in one cold night.
Ad nauseam: be weary of Modi bearing gifts.
Is this even allowed ? Weird .
It will be costly to take on Afghanistan -- but Pakistan has no choice.
How Pakistan can lesson the cost is to have better relations with India. The more beneficial arrangement in 40-60 years is an AfPak confederation that has excellent relations which India. That can be done by demolishing the current setup in Afghanistan but building good relations with India.
India doesn't give two figs about Afghanistan ... for India the Afghans are just convenient fools. India does want to have good relations with Pakistan and so should Pakistan.
So Afghanistan has become equivalent to Israel in Pakistani policy making circles? @A-Team
USSR won Stalingrad because it had superior resource compared to Germans, and had American land-lease program backing it up with materials. In this case you have superior resources than Afghans , but India could run a lend-lease program for Afghanistan, if you enter hostilities with them. Don't be certain about victor in this case.
Nearly all Muslim countries do this to Israel, so it certainly is allowed.
I mean what were the Afghan thinking ... I mean seriously ... everyday this situation is escalating and could get ugly soon.
It is very easy to destroy things ... building them is excruciatingly harder
Why not to go international court against India when it close it's border for Nepali people. Pakistan should take the case to international court against India.
This is standard practice,
Try going to india if you have a pakistani visa on your passport.
Why does the Indian government insist that dual national Pakistanis apply for an Indian visa on their Pakistani passport?
Equally bad however we still allow visa's....no?? There is no blanket ban...we have made the process very difficult and same thing could have been applied for Afghans if the issue is somewhat related to terrorism...but a blanket ban is plain stupid....hope you get the drift...aaa have you tried getting an Indian visa as a Pakistani..Not sure how bad the reverse is
It is your politics and policy that (how to fight a Muslim with a Muslim) and you have succeed in this.Good for India, the more harsh Pakistan comes on Afghans, the more nearer Afghans will be with India
pak visa fee for indians is 15 rs.... i think its more or less similar for indian visa(as these fees are usually reciprocal)India offering free visas. That explains a lot
Equally bad however we still allow visa's....no?? There is no blanket ban...we have made the process very difficult and same thing could have been applied for Afghans if the issue is somewhat related to terrorism...but a blanket ban is plain stupid....hope you get the drift...
So India has become equivalent to Israel for Afghans in Pakistani policy making circles? @A-Team
USSR won Stalingrad because it had superior resource compared to Germans, and had American land-lease program backing it up with materials. In this case you have superior resources than Afghans , but India could run a lend-lease program for Afghanistan, if you enter hostilities with them. Don't be certain about victor in this case.
Unfortunately that is true for all...no? Visiting USA is a privilege and not my right either...Oh I'm sure Afghans with reach can get to Pakistan -- but many Pakistani Americans I know (emphasis on I know -- I'm not speaking for people at large here) opted to just say no to getting an Indian visa -- with out exception, all of them are people who advocate friendly ties with India and have been ever to visit India.
I myself have thought of visiting many times but the based on the paperwork I said maybe later -- and I'm as muck of a proponent you can have on positive Pak/India relations.
Again not saying one justifies the other -- but I understand visiting India is a privilege and not my right.
I have never heard of land-lease -- what was that -- and I am doubtful of any such facility -- there was lend-lease and cash-and-carry ?
The case of India and the US vis-a-vis Afghanistan and the USSR is really not comparable.
The USSR and US were powers in their own right -- Afghanistan has no such position.
Neither is India a global power -- nor is does India have access -- to Afghanistan. Plus the local hegemony is China.
Further let's assume what you say is true: as I've said before -- if Afghans wish to be a football in India/Pakistan rivalry then so be it. I would bet the Afghans are not that stupid.
Lend Lease was a program that gave Roosevelt(President of USA during world war II) powers to sell, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise dispose of defence equipments to any government. Though in the context of USSR and Germany it played little role as writing on the wall was already there for Germans by the time equipment started landing and put to battle front by the mighty USSR....I have never heard of land-lease -- what was that -- and I am doubtful of any such facility -- there was lend-lease and .
india treats pakistani national(or afgan nationals) who need treatment in India differently... sometimes hospitals help them to do the formalities.. since 2008 mumbai attack, people of pakistani origin(not pakistani citizen) are under more focus and need more time to get visa.Oh I'm sure Afghans with reach can get to Pakistan -- but many Pakistani Americans I know (emphasis on I know -- I'm not speaking for people at large here) opted to just say no to getting an Indian visa -- with out exception, all of them are people who advocate friendly ties with India and have been ever to visit India.
I myself have thought of visiting many times but the based on the paperwork I said maybe later -- and I'm as muck of a proponent you can have on positive Pak/India relations.
Again not saying one justifies the other -- but I understand visiting India is a privilege and not my right.
.
I have never heard of land-lease -- what was that -- and I am doubtful of any such facility -- there was lend-lease and cash-and-carry ?
The case of India and the US vis-a-vis Afghanistan and the USSR is really not comparable.
The USSR and US were powers in their own right -- Afghanistan has no such position.
Neither is India a global power -- nor is does India have access -- to Afghanistan. Plus the local hegemony is China.
Further let's assume what you say is true: as I've said before -- if Afghans wish to be a football in India/Pakistan rivalry then so be it. I would bet the Afghans are not that stupid.