iLION12345_1
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,604
- Reaction score
- 32
- Country
- Location
View attachment 750489
a few other interesting points;
VT-4 has 8xx mm of protection against APFSDS projectiles with FY-2 ERA on turret and Hull front. Even if we assume the lowest possible value of 800mm, with FY-4E ERA like the Pakistani ones have, the Front protection of VT-4 is superior to Indian T90S (which has around 800-880MM depending on the exact region). Not a small accomplishment considering how good Russian armor is.
It also shows that Al-Khalids armor is not that far behind VT-4 and T90S, which makes sense considering it has High-hardened steel base+ Ukrainian/Russian style composites + NERA inserts and newer ERA. Al-khalid needs better side protection and turret ERA coverage, hopefully something we will see in the next version.
a few other interesting points;
VT-4 has 8xx mm of protection against APFSDS projectiles with FY-2 ERA on turret and Hull front. Even if we assume the lowest possible value of 800mm, with FY-4E ERA like the Pakistani ones have, the Front protection of VT-4 is superior to Indian T90S (which has around 800-880MM depending on the exact region). Not a small accomplishment considering how good Russian armor is.
It also shows that Al-Khalids armor is not that far behind VT-4 and T90S, which makes sense considering it has High-hardened steel base+ Ukrainian/Russian style composites + NERA inserts and newer ERA. Al-khalid needs better side protection and turret ERA coverage, hopefully something we will see in the next version.