What's new

Pakistan army says US scapegoating

.
sory for urdu my english is not good enough.

kisi nay kaha hai k jab bari imarat taameer kee jati hai to us ke bunyad bohot gehri khodi jati hai. agar aaj ham aram say usaid par time guzar bhe lain to kal mushkil to ani hai. phir kun na aaj he thori mushkil time guzar kar aany waley wakat ko behtar banain. kam az kam hamary aany wali nasal hamri tarah ghulam to nahi ho ge.
 
.
sory for urdu my english is not good enough.

kisi nay kaha hai k jab bari imarat taameer kee jati hai to us ke bunyad bohot gehri khodi jati hai. agar aaj ham aram say usaid par time guzar bhe lain to kal mushkil to ani hai. phir kun na aaj he thori mushkil time guzar kar aany waley wakat ko behtar banain. kam az kam hamary aany wali nasal hamri tarah ghulam to nahi ho ge.

I wish you luck in implementing these noble thoughts.
 
. .
By tangible action do you mean something like blocking NATO supplies?:usflag:

Yes, it is a tangible action, you are correct. But counter-productive. Besides, let's see how this tangible action, ill-advised as it is, results in the next steps and who has the spine to back up their actions.
 
.
'all out cooperation' should be contingent on NATO's willingness to ensure that explosives, drugs and terrorists (including rebels that disturb peace in Balochistan Province) crossing over to Pakistan are halted as well

to imply that Pakistani state is complicit in supplying IEDs and explosives (when all we're doing is exporting fertilizer) is beyond absurd....it will ensure that there is mutual mistrust and continued ignorance of the truth

3 years of media trials and baseless threats/pressure hasn't paid off....and it wont in the future

Yes, it is a tangible action, you are correct. But counter-productive. Besides, let's see how this tangible action, ill-advised as it is, results in the next steps and who has the spine to back up their actions.

it isn't counter-productive because the opening of the supply route is contingent on the US/NATOs fulfilling the recommendations made forth by the Parliamentary commission.

our land.....our decision.
 
.
................
it isn't counter-productive because the opening of the supply route is contingent on the US/NATOs fulfilling the recommendations made forth by the Parliamentary commission.

our land.....our decision.

I would agree with you the moment one or more of the PCNS recommendations are accepted by USA; until then the blockade is all counter-" with no "-productive".

Of course I do respect your last line. Just keep in mind that all decisions have repercussions. Your land, your decision, as are the repercussions of those decisions. I am perfectly respectful of that.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom