Dazzler
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 9,163
- Reaction score
- 31
- Country
- Location
"To develop" does NOT mean "developed". Read above post on why Altay was never really considered as it failed on multiple fronts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And when did that happen?AK-2 work was stopped, so don't expect it to enter service soon, funds are issue due to corrupt governments.
And when did that happen?
Last time i heard it was still under development.. according to HIT officials ...
Do you have some other source ? Please provide.
Altay is not going to fail now the reason is because Germany refusing to upgrade Leopard tank for turkey and that means Turkey has no other option."To develop" does NOT mean "developed". Read above post on why Altay was never really considered as it failed on multiple fronts.
I asked for a source dude..It was also shared here as HIT did not had funds, even AK-1 production suffered, that is why PA is looking off the shelve purchase of tanks as HIT can not keep up pace of building tanks in required numbers.
How credible is this news? I thought Pak Army was testing VT4 and OPLOT...so why would they all of a sudden start negotiating for Altay without even testing it? Moreover it's engine is still in development by Turkey.
Its a random tweet ... by some random guy...How credible is this news? I thought Pak Army was testing VT4 and OPLOT...so why would they all of a sudden start negotiating for Altay without even testing it? Moreover it's engine is still in development by Turkey.
I asked for a source dude..
I can post mine... including new subsystems for AKII ..
Ok good to knowIts a random tweet ... by some random guy...
About a tank still under development... vs AK-II project and Oplot & VT4 trials.
Senate Defence Committee Nov,2017Then post it please and what I say is posted on PDF with source already.
Oplot is a better choice.. due to commonality with UD and its upgrade..Ok good to know
On a side note...I would personally like OPLOT as Al-Haider with upgrades so it has certain key features that it lacks compared to VT4...and the subsystems from Turkey(Altay) going in both Al-Khalid and Al-Haider to increase commonality between the two as much as possible. Of course I also hope that Pak would also produce Oplot-P locally(under license). These two over time should replace all other older tanks and form the high/low mix in Pak army...though this is all just my wish
Dude, this guy has posted some tweets in the past which i thought were sensational but proved to be on the target hence i posted him here. Else this news has been circulating for over a year now.Its a random tweet ... by some random guy...
About a tank still under development... vs AK-II project and Oplot & VT4 trials.
Altay is not going to fail now the reason is because Germany refusing to upgrade Leopard tank for turkey and that means Turkey has no other option.
Your point on Ammo is 100% valid and I will take that as more serious reason for not inducting Altay.
Plus the Al-Khalid 2 is in some kind of progress mode as well. The recent visits to Poland the Ukraine factor and every thing else shows things moving in different direction. It is too early to say what will happen so I will have to agree with you here because there is no clear path currently.
At around $9-10 a piece, it is too expensive for PA.
Senate Defence Committee Nov,2017
https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/20...uction-of-al-khalid-2-tanks-senate-body-told/
December 2017 - Janes;
http://www.janes.com/article/76098/fiscal-constraints-hit-pakistan-s-production-of-al-khalid-i-tanks
Quwa 2018;
https://quwa.org/2018/01/14/malyshev-plant-delivers-6td-2-engine-kits-to-pakistan-for-al-khalid-i/
Oplot is a better choice.. due to commonality with UD and its upgrade..