Blackpearl
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 403
- Reaction score
- 0
Single engined cobras are more then enough, low maintenance cost, less ground crew required for maintenance & will have better operational availability.
We should get the latest single engined cobras more with the ability to fire laser guided weaponry.
Yes right, easy to maintain, at low cost. single engine cobras.
However, i would say, a twin engin offers good power to weight ratio, when cobra has to operate in mountainious terrain (remember cobra is not meant for mountains, it is for plains warfare, countering advancing enemy armour)
But when cobra is shovled in COIN ops, in mountains and valleys, where it has to clear ridges and peaks averaging 5000-7000 feet and more, its old 1400 horsepower engines cannot cope up with this starin. with les power margin available with the pilot, definitely he will carry less fuel (means less endurance, range) and less ammunition.
Full compliment of weapon load at sea level of Cobra is 8 TOWs, 14/38 rockets (in 7/19 tube rocket launchers, and 750 20 mm cannon. However, in mountain, due to thin air/density power margin is limited, so pilot will shed of its weapon load.
in TV chaanels, when ever a cobra is shown flying, and also in all the pictures in Pakistan Defence of Cobra you will see it is always have only 4 tubes and max TOWs carried are 2. So from 8 to 2, you can well imagine what are the limitations are imposed in case of old single engine.