Featured Pakistan Armed Forces have been placed on Red Alert in view of Indian military preparations

[FAROOQ RASHID BUTT]

Ghaznavi and Ghauri were Pakistanis? Lol.

Let the ignorant know that Ghaznavi and Ghauri were Muslim characters of pre partition age. They were and are symbols of Muslims bravery against Hindutva . We are first Muslim Ummah and then Pakistani. And world knows that Pakistan, the only nuclear power of the Muslim Ummah, is capable and ready to lead the entire Muslim Ummah ..... Remember !!!!! The end of Hindutva in the Indian invasion will be the concluding part of the history... Then there will be no state terrorism of Modi or tyranny of insane Hindutva in Kashmir , Ahmedabad or anywhere..

 

[Jackdaws]

Let the ignorant know that Ghaznavi and Ghauri were Muslim characters of pre partition age. They were and are symbols of Muslims bravery against Hindutva . We are first Muslim Ummah and then Pakistani. And world knows that Pakistan, the only nuclear power of the Muslim Ummah, is capable and ready to lead the entire Muslim Ummah ..... Remember !!!!! The end of Hindutva in the Indian invasion will be the concluding part of the history... Then there will be no state terrorism of Modi or tyranny of insane Hindutva in Kashmir , Ahmedabad or anywhere..

I don't even know where to begin to address your fiction

1. Ghaznavi and Ghauri were not Pakistani
2. Hindutva ideology wasn't even around then - you are off - umm - by about a 1000 years.
3. There is no ummah and if there was, no one even considers Pak as its leader even within the OIC. The so called ummah is constantly fighting amongst itself.
4. The end of Hindutva in power will come via the Indian ballot - just a matter of time.

 

[Trango Towers]

What will happen if Pakistan decided they was a 25 day war

 

[Trango Towers]

India is preparing for 15 days of 2 front war intense war. If Pakistan decides to fight 25 day war, India will be ready. Remember India can purchase weapons from all over the world.

Loool.. india is winning on all fronts. Bs

 

[Basel]

The post-Cold Start doctrine would be when India would hold onto the territory after declaring a unilateral ceasefire to negotiate concessions from Pakistan on a peace deal. The territory to be seized would have to be painful enough for Pakistan to want to negotiate and also agree to a ceasefire instead of escalating. For example seizing a portion of the CPEC or the Lahore Karachi rail link near Multan. In the past India seized territory but it was not significant or important enough for Pakistan to either accept ceasefire to prevent damage and a human toll or to negotiate even when a ceasefire was negotiated. In 1965 Pakistan continued to attack Dograi near Lahore refusing a ceasefire resolution in the UN and refused negotiations. Ultimately India had to withdraw from Dograi and also from Haji Peer Pass. Some say this humiliation was the cause of the Indian Premier's death after the Tashkent summit.

In 1971 India and Pakistan captured bits of territory on the Western Front front and only territory on the international border was swapped. On the LOC unlike in 1965 there was no swap. India held Turtok and parts of Kargil which gave it an advantage in the Siachen conflict later. Pakistan held on to its gains in Chamb Jaurian which gives it a significant advantage in the Jammu and Poonch area today. India would like its territory in the Chamb Jaurian area back. In 1971 India implemented a prior 48 hour unilateral ceasefire in accordance with the UN resolution which the Soviet Union advised, while Pakistan kept the offensive till the ceasefire deadline went into effect. India withdrew to avoid taking heavy casualties. India was under heavy pressure in the east facing a cocked fist from the USN Seventh Fleet which threatened to wipe out their Eastern Command. That would surely have led to withdrawal of the Indian armed forces from Bangladesh which though would never have reverted to Pakistan would have freed the Pakistani prisoners and returned them to Pakistan under US / UN peacekeeping forces. A US friendly regime in Bangladesh would have helped US retain its earlier access to Chittagong. So in effect India chose to loose territory for the longer strategic game of Bangladesh and POWs, This would fail on account of China's presence in the UN who blocked Bangladesh's entry till Pakistan's POWs were returned. The US got most of its access back into Bangladesh especially after Bangladesh signed a Status of Forces Agreement in 2005 ( ?).
The new Cold Start is based on an earlier attempt in 1987 called Operation Brasstacks which was an attempt to force Pakistan to surrender Azad Kashmir in exchange for Multan or Bahawalpur and before the time window closed as Pakistan would shortly be acquiring nuclear capabilities.
Pakistan's doctrine against Cold Start is unprecedented because it actually is a nuclear version of the Soviet Union's scorched earth policy. Bluntly:
Pakistan will use its tactical nuclear weapons on its own territory against an Indian occupation, human cost not withstanding. Pakistan maintains the moral and tactical advantage. This scenario was war gamed by NATO when the conventional offensive advantage lay overwhelmingly with the Warsaw Pact powers. So NATO would use tactical nuclear weapons to blunt a Soviet Warsaw Pact thrust through the" Fulda gap " analogous to the Bahawalpur sector on the IB where an Indian conventional thrust is likely.
India threatens a city busting nuclear response to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. How genuine that threat is remains to be seen since tactical nuclear weapons produce relatively less contamination and 20 kiloton strike on Karachi would spread contamination into Gujarat. That of course if Pakistan doesn't respond in kind and lands a similar 20 kt lollipop onto Raisina Hill in Delhi.
Dangerous times !

Pakistani military is preparing to counter whatever India will through and that is why changes are being made on all levels, there is a reason PAF have new MoB at Bholari and Jacobabad with F-16s.

 

[AUz]

Ghaznavi and Ghauri were Pakistanis? Lol.

They were Muslim political leaders/Conquerors who fought against barbarian Hindus. They are our heroes. There was no "india" or "Pakistan" back then.

Abdali was born in Pakistan btw. He decimated your marathas and sunk em into Panipat's gutters forever. Marathas never fully recovered afterwards. He's our hero too

 

[Jackdaws]

They were Muslim political leaders/Conquerors who fought against barbarian Hindus. They are our heroes. There was no "india" or "Pakistan" back then.

Abdali was born in Pakistan btw. He decimated your marathas and sunk em into Panipat's gutters forever. Marathas never fully recovered afterwards. He's our hero too

Lol. Sure. That's like some Catholic from Goa claiming credit for the Portuguese inquisition and breaking Hindu temples.

 

[AUz]

Lol. Sure. That's like some Catholic from Goa claiming credit for the Portuguese inquisition and breaking Hindu temples.

LMAO, Portugese weren't regional Christians and Christianity doesn't really have a concept like Ummah but sure...whatever floats your boat Pakistan, which is the largest pashtun country in the world, shouldn't take pride in our Pashtun Muslim heroes of the past (like Abdali) who fought against Hindu barbarians? Sure...."goa" and "Portuguese"

The fact remains that Muslim world even today has a special brotherly bond because of our shared religion, values, cultural aspects, and even language (Arabic is language of prayer ALL OVER Muslim world for example.)....We are a Ummah (one family) at the end of the day as our Prophet (saw) stated....despite our internal conflicts.

Western world can also be seen as an example of a lose-knit family and many European indeed saw themselves as such...even while they were slaughtering each other on industrial scale and aligning themselves with non-Western powers against their own Western cousins.

West and Islam are global civilizations and hence this is normal behavior (civilizational/cultural brotherhood yet conflict within). Localized, backward, and dominated weak cultures like india (hindus) won’t get it.

 

[crankthatskunk]

India is preparing for 15 days of 2 front war intense war. If Pakistan decides to fight 25 day war, India will be ready. Remember India can purchase weapons from all over the world.

Yeah sure, it can buy weapons. Who is going to use them is the question!

What will happen if Pakistan decided they was a 25 day war

~I don't know about the video star's military acumen, but he is good in selling his exams papers. lolz

 

[BlueWhales]

Seems Fake News

 

[Jackdaws]

LMAO, Portugese weren't regional Christians and Christianity doesn't really have a concept like Ummah but sure...whatever floats your boat Pakistan, which is the largest pashtun country in the world, shouldn't take pride in our Pashtun Muslim heroes of the past (like Abdali) who fought against Hindu barbarians? Sure...."goa" and "Portuguese"

The fact remains that Muslim world even today has a special brotherly bond because of our shared religion, values, cultural aspects, and even language (Arabic is language of prayer ALL OVER Muslim world for example.)....We are a Ummah (one family) at the end of the day as our Prophet (saw) stated....despite our internal conflicts.

Western world can also be seen as an example of a lose-knit family and many European indeed saw themselves as such...even while they were slaughtering each other on industrial scale and aligning themselves with non-Western powers against their own Western cousins.

West and Islam are global civilizations and hence this is normal behavior (civilizational/cultural brotherhood yet conflict within). Localized, backward, and dominated weak cultures like india (hindus) won’t get it.

Lol. Sure, we've seen the so called ummah and its unity. In the last 50 years alone - with Iraq fighting Iran, Iraq invading Kuwait, Saudis jostling for power, East Pakistanis separating from West Pakistanis and numerous other conflicts.

And I understand that when you don't have heroes to look upto from your own land you start appropriating heroes from overseas. So an Afghan like Abdali, a Gujarati like Jinnah are your heroes. Whatever makes you feel better. I am sure it helps you sleep at night.

 

[AUz]

Lol. Sure, we've seen the so called ummah and its unity. In the last 50 years alone - with Iraq fighting Iran, Iraq invading Kuwait, Saudis jostling for power, East Pakistanis separating from West Pakistanis and numerous other conflicts.

So you deflected from the topic of "existence of Ummah" to topic of "Political unity in Ummah"....Nobody claimed Ummah today is politically united. All I claimed is that Muslim Ummah exists and is a civilizational reality. Similarly, nobody would claim in 1600's, 1700's, or 1800's or even early 1900's that Europeans weren't a civilizational reality. They were---but it doesn't mean Europe was political united back in those centuries. They fought among themselves for centuries, on a scale that hasn't been replicated in Islamic world yet (Thank God).

Internal strife does not negate the reality of civilizational existences and cultural bonds based on shared identities and values...be it Europe or global Islam.

As I said, I know you are an indian---backward, weak, dominated, irrelevant, localized nobody. A footnote in history. You will have a hard time understanding this lol

And I understand that when you don't have heroes to look upto from your own land you start appropriating heroes from overseas. So an Afghan like Abdali, a Gujarati like Jinnah are your heroes. Whatever makes you feel better. I am sure it helps you sleep at night.

HAHAHAHAAHAHA, so now even our founding Father---Muhammad Ali Jinnah---is not a hero because he was a "gujrati" By this logic, Shiva ji shouldn't be a hero to non-Marathi indians? Oh wait, he is but you hate when Pakistanis celebrate Muslim heroes of ours because your inferiority-complex can't tolerate us celebrate Muslim conquerors that humiliated you, destroyed your weak kingdoms, ruled your capital, and ultimately ended your barbaric 'dharma' from vast territories forever.

Stay mad, kiddo. We see through you. So Abdali---born in Multan---shouldn't be our hero even though Multan is in Pakistan. Abdali was a Pashtun and Pakistan is the largest Pashtun country, and he was a Muslim like us, and fought Hindu barbarians in the same region as we are fight them?

Ok got it

Dont worry about us mate, hundreds of millions of indians also regard these conquerors as heroes Aurangzeb was a hero too btw.

 

[Jackdaws]

So you deflected from the topic of "existence of Ummah" to topic of "Political unity in Ummah"....Nobody claimed Ummah today is politically united. All I claimed is that Muslim Ummah exists and is a civilizational reality. Similarly, nobody would claim in 1600's, 1700's, or 1800's or even early 1900's that Europeans weren't a civilizational reality. They were---but it doesn't mean Europe was political united back in those centuries. They fought among themselves for centuries, on a scale that hasn't been replicated in Islamic world yet (Thank God).

Internal strife does not negate the reality of civilizational existences and cultural bonds based on shared identities and values...be it Europe or global Islam.

As I said, I know you are an indian---backward, weak, dominated, irrelevant, localized nobody. A footnote in history. You will have a hard time understanding this lol



HAHAHAHAAHAHA, so now even our founding Father---Muhammad Ali Jinnah---is not a hero because he was a "gujrati" By this logic, Shiva ji shouldn't be a hero to non-Marathi indians? Oh wait, he is but you hate when Pakistanis celebrate Muslim heroes of ours because your inferiority-complex can't tolerate us celebrate Muslim conquerors that humiliated you, destroyed your weak kingdoms, ruled your capital, and ultimately ended your barbaric 'dharma' from vast territories forever.

Stay mad, kiddo. We see through you. So Abdali---born in Multan---shouldn't be our hero even though Multan is in Pakistan. Abdali was a Pashtun and Pakistan is the largest Pashtun country, and he was a Muslim like us, and fought Hindu barbarians in the same region as we are fight them?

Ok got it

Dont worry about us mate, hundreds of millions of indians also regard these conquerors as heroes Aurangzeb was a hero too btw.

Lol. So much angst. And such flights of fancy. Hahaha. Civilizational unity? Lol. Yea, we've seen that too. Except civilizations are based on race/ethnicity not religion. Hence the Persian civilization is distinct from the Arab civilization. You don't fit in either despite trying to hang onto its coattails. Grab an Afghan Abdali, grab a Gujarati Jinnah, grab a language from Central India as your national language and dream of Ummah whilst the Arabs don't give you time of day. Is there any part of present day Pak which has at some point not been ruled by Hindus or Sikhs or Brits?

 

[BATMAN]

Pakistan already lost to capitalize on last God given opportunity, i was expecting next opportunity will not come in my life time, but good to know its coming soon.

I hope, soldiers would not listen to any calls of cease fire from their officers.

Remember, we have thousands of prisoners of 1971 war still in Indian custody, sooner we take revenge, the better.

 

[ACE OF HEARTS]

Lol. So much angst. And such flights of fancy. Hahaha. Civilizational unity? Lol. Yea, we've seen that too. Except civilizations are based on race/ethnicity not religion. Hence the Persian civilization is distinct from the Arab civilization. You don't fit in either despite trying to hang onto its coattails. Grab an Afghan Abdali, grab a Gujarati Jinnah, grab a language from Central India as your national language and dream of Ummah whilst the Arabs don't give you time of day. Is there any part of present day Pak which has at some point not been ruled by Hindus or Sikhs or Brits?

Impressive content writing Sir. I hope there isn't an army of Indian content writers behind you.
Bitter truth though

Matching India militarily, 1:1 or 1:1.5, ain't anything to be proud of. No deep pockets and depending on endless favors by close friends. How long is this going to last.

Economically, Pakistan is very weak and India can simply buy off influence.

Corrupt thieves have been favoured again and again to rule Pakistan, by none other than those who claim to protect the structural integrity of Pakistan.

Although, history has proven otherwise. Don't expect retired souls to agree with you when the only thing they have been trained to do is fight from childhood.

Though I do disagree with you on some points.

Mighty Soviet Union collapsed. What makes Pakistan so much more strong, just by being a Nuclear power?
The dominance of the majority over the minority has proved that the fault lies within, unless parity in representation is spread from North to South, east to west.

Smaller administrative units throughout having there own administrative systems representing there own people instead of someone coming from outside and ruling the majority.