Pakistan alleges role of US behind No Confidence Vote against PTI government

[dbc]

Evidence?

Some would say past is prologue.

But yea, as someone else said, wait a little while should be coming to future wikileak!

Jack the ripper may have been a serial killer but it does not mean he murdered everyone that was killed in London in the late 1800's.

 

[farok84]

 

[Bratva]

and your judgment is clouded by your bias. There is no evidence to support Imran Khan's 'regime change' narrative. I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm saying there is no evidence.

There is no bias when american diplomat running around meeting the people who shouldnt be. The only bias here is you selectively ignoring the activities of American diplomats.
So why the esteemed american diplomats violating the norms of diplomacy met 9-12 opposition leaders in march who are about to impeach Imran Khan?

 

[Avicenna]

Jack the ripper may have been a serial killer but it does not mean he murdered everyone that was killed in London in the late 1800's.

LOL.

Nice try.

 

[ColonelSanders]

Jack the ripper may have been a serial killer but it does not mean he murdered everyone that was killed in London in the late 1800's.

Ok Sir. Your pigs can fly. I saw them flying myself.

 

[JX-1]

and your judgment is clouded by your bias. There is no evidence to support Imran Khan's 'regime change' narrative. I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm saying there is no evidence.

The Biden Administration's attitude towards Pakistan, as well as the eerie parallels with Bhutto's overthrow, suggest the US is trying to install a puppet government - IMO to wage guerilla warfare against China in Xinjiang.

 

[Darth Vader]

Lets just say Uncle sam did it, and Political parties are involved why hasnt Pakistani state kicked off the ambassador atleast even if you are going down show the world, what is happening that way Imran Khan earns some brownie points home and on other fronts.

And Imran khan can openly say to public look they did this i kicked the ambassador.
Simple protest will get you no where neither it will get any time on International media

 

[ghazi52]

....

American: we can not say to India,: they are independent state....!

So what are we ????????

............

 

[Bilal.]

validated means what exactly? Did NSC interview everyone that attended the meeting and obtain a testimony from each to establish facts?

NSC that includes of top civil/military bureaucracy snd security agencies including that from foreign office that have decades of experience knows exactly what they need to validate it.

You and I questioning their understanding is ridiculous. They are competent enough to verify the document. They have issued a condemnation statement snd this is backed by all concerned arms of the state of Pakistan including the ones that have remained “neutral” in the recent political developments.

and your judgment is clouded by your bias. There is no evidence to support Imran Khan's 'regime change' narrative. I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm saying there is no evidence.

It’s not IK’s narrative. It’s a fact endorsed by the state of Pakistan as validated by NSC and backed by its official statement.

 

[dbc]

NSC that includes of top civil/military bureaucracy snd security agencies including that from foreign office that have decades of experience knows exactly what they need to validate it.

You mean the NSC that reports into the Prime Ministers office?

 

[lastofthepatriots]

These are old tricks they are playing. They did the same shit to the Iranians back in the day.

 

[SaadH]

Look we can only influence our internal environment and make sure it is robust enough to not be bought off like this.

Article 6 high treason on all the politicians who are involved in this coup and make an example out of them. Put them on a flight ban ASAP and ISI need to get to Husain Haqqani somehow.

What if ISI is on the take themselves?

 

[Bilal.]

You mean the NSC that reports into the Prime Ministers office?

The NSC that includes heads of all institutions that are colloquially called the “establishment”.

 

[ghazi52]

,.,.,

PM Imran has built himself up as a lone fighter for Pakistan’s cause​

BY condemning in advance those who will be voting against him on Sunday as willing accomplices in an international conspiracy, Prime Minister Imran Khan has cemented his narrative for his upcoming election campaign. He knows that he is not going to survive, but, through a lengthy primetime address heavy on sermon and nationalist zeal, he has ensured that he will remain relevant to a broad cross-section of the electorate easily swayed by emotion and deeply invested in conspiracy theories.

He knows that publicly appealing to the better nature of his opponents is unlikely to win him any votes; yet, by premising his emotive appeal on upholding the dream of an independent Pakistan, he has cleverly framed going against him as akin to going against the founding fathers themselves. He has also, once again, built himself up as a lone fighter for Pakistan’s cause — the only voice to stand against tyranny when American drones were raining death on Pakistani soil. Now, he tells his supporters, he is being targeted for not kneeling to foreign powers’ demands to surrender Pakistan’s sovereignty.

He has asked why he should be punished for wanting Pakistan to be treated as an equal and not a servile partner while painting his opponents as willing sell-outs because they are so compromised by their corrupt deeds. This is shrewd messaging, built on the trope of a lone warrior fighting against insurmountable odds and it is clear the embattled prime minister hopes to turn public sympathies to his side once he goes down in parliament.

With his campaign strategy set, one hopes that the prime minister will let go of his ‘cable-gate’ ploy. He has already made a highly irresponsible mistake by letting slip that the cable originated in America after being advised by all the officials who matter to tread with care.

The National Security Committee, after being apprised of the contents of the diplomatic cable in question, had issued a reasonably worded statement that ought to have mollified the indignant premier and given him a graceful way out of a serious diplomatic mess. The committee had also assured that Pakistan would raise the matter through a “strong demarche”, “in keeping with diplomatic norms”. This is the sane, measured response one hoped to have initially seen.

It is worth asking why taking the letter to the NSC was not the first thing to have crossed the Foreign Office’s mind. If it was clear that a line had been crossed, why was this unveiled through a prop at a political event? Who advised the prime minister that this was the best strategy to take? The prime minister also owes it to the Pakistani people to reveal who he believes are the internal elements facilitating this alleged conspiracy against the country. It cannot only be the politicians at fault.

Published in Dawn, April 1st, 2022
.,.,.,.,.

 

[dbc]

The NSC that includes heads of all institutions that are colloquially called the “establishment”.

why are you dancing around an undeniable fact that the NSC is chaired by the Prime Minister...