Michel Niesten
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2019
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
But they haven’t been delivered yet. These 4 are still in Belgium
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You posted the Retirement of RAF's C-130's on the Pakistan Air Force thread.END OF AN ERA
C-130 RETIRED FROM RAF SERVICE
10TH JUNE 2023
A flypast to mark the forthcoming retirement of the Hercules from RAF service
A flypast to mark the forthcoming retirement of the Hercules from RAF service will take place across all four nations of the United Kingdom on Wednesday 14 June.www.raf.mod.uk
You posted the Retirement of RAF's C-130's on the Pakistan Air Force thread.
Any clue as to where these Herc's are going other than the boneyard...
Logistic and Support infrastructure and 50 odd years of flying and supporting experience makes the C-130 an ideal choice, too bad nothing came of Y-30 after a model presentation. I can't speak much about Y-9, while my understanding was / is that the ZDK is based on much upgraded Y-8 and not Y-9. However, then again I do not know how different Y-9 are to Y-8 parts comparability wise.I can understand why the PAF would want additional used Hercs, but it's really time to move away from the type IMO. The Y-9 would be the best alternative IMO, we already operate the platform for the ZDK-03 and China is investing heavily in the type given all the numerous C4I and surveillance variants. It would also reduce maintenance and support costs if we harmonise tactical transports on a single type rather than relying on two types.
Hi,I can understand why the PAF would want additional used Hercs, but it's really time to move away from the type IMO. The Y-9 would be the best alternative IMO, we already operate the platform for the ZDK-03 and China is investing heavily in the type given all the numerous C4I and surveillance variants. It would also reduce maintenance and support costs if we harmonise tactical transports on a single type rather than relying on two types.
i always believe we need 50 c130 s due to our size and requirementsHi,
We are already working on extremely reduced costs on the C-130's---. They are peanuts to what would cost to buy new aircraft and maintain them---train new staff---create new facilities---.
With the C-130's---we buy them---we dump them in the 'old yard'---with the 'old techs'---with the 'old equipment & machinery'---to keep them in an operational condition---.
The primary focus for pak military should always be to get the best frontline combat equipment---.