What's new

Pakistan Air Force to procure Belgian C-130 Transport Aircraft | June 2022 .

. .
Belgium can’t sell F-16’s if the US doesn’t approve. For transport aircraft it’s much easier to be sold with agreement from the US.
The US also blocked the sale of Israeli F-16’s to Croatia.
 
.
Retired ones are included ?


RJAF is a regular buyer of Ex-Belgian F-16s.
 
Last edited:
. .
Used aircraft are used aircraft. Most of PAF old and used procurement are good to maintain numbers and status quo in peace time but if push comes to shove, and used extensively during war, they might simply structurally give up when they are most needed.
 
.
7-8 more aircraft, good number for additional lift capability.
Although these craft are ageing now.
Getting a new type at this stage means installing the infrastructure and maintaining stores. PAF's experience with the Antanovs has not been a good one. Given half a choice we will go for the C130s anyday . We have 50yrs of experience on the platform and ability to overhaul and repair them in house.
A
Did the math, these aircraft have flown less than 28k flight hours(per a/c) over 50 years. Theyre very lightly used. Just the SLEP adds 40k flight hours, these can serve well into the 2050s.
Procuring russian transport planes is a better and cheaper option.
Our obsession with old and expensive US tech never ends.
Yep. And getting our F-16A/B fleet up by 50-60% (i.e., another 40 aircraft) would be a nice boon too. I would rather old F-16s (especially ones that can carry the AMRAAM-C5) than F-7Ps. We can also shift more of the A2A-focused JF-17 Block-2s into the A2G/S role. It's amazing how seemingly "nothing" type acquisitions can trigger a butterfly-effect of capability growth across the stack.
Will a new sqn be raised?









 
Last edited:
. .
Procuring russian transport planes is a better and cheaper option.
Our obsession with old and expensive US tech never ends.
Buying Russian transport planes mean that PAF has to build an entire maintenance infrastructure for them.

And C130s have been the the transport workhorse for PAF for 50 years. We have our own maintenance and overhauling infrastructure in place for them. Why would PAF spend huge amounts of money when we are already cash strapped?

And to add that, Russian military equipment is notorious for being too much maintenance prone.
 
Last edited:
. .
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom