What's new

Pakistan Air Force to gain superiority over the Indian Air Force

Status
Not open for further replies.
^

Bharti air force is number 1 in the universe. Happy? :angel:
 
.
Lawlz. Stop hurting others feelings man. :rofl:

To be honest the days of light fighters are gone. The future sky belongs to fighters like this. Modern fighter need to carry power radars and internal rocket camber if possible. That requires a large body.

27_206366_fb0027d99d98500.jpg


U347P886T1D14835F12DT20120513140045.jpeg
 
.
Lawlz. Stop hurting others feelings man. :rofl:
i thought you wanted to comment on these Pakistan Air Force to gain superiority over the Indian Air Force:coffee:
 
.
Kashmir was a buffer state and pakistan was the aggressor,the king asked for our help and we interfered
:coffee:

Maharaja was hindu that's why he demanded indian help while more than 70% people of kashmir wanted to join pakistan.
 
.
i thought you wanted to comment on these Pakistan Air Force to gain superiority over the Indian Air Force:coffee:

PAF will always be superior. To be frank your economy can do nothing about it.
 
.
You are right Kashmir is still with India. It was 100% with India before the 1948 War, but India only had 77% of it after the 1948 War.

Yes India was left with 74% of Kashmir after the 1965 War. Kashmir is sill with India just 26% less. Pakistan did give 9% of Kashmir to China, but since Pakistan Army was the victor, it had the right to hand over the territory to China.

Let's get the facts straight.

read the history of Kashmir before making comments..Kashmir was annexed into India after Pakistan's invasion into kashmir..and after that India pushed Pak army and tribal hordes outside of kashmir(almost)..if it was not nehru,there will be no dispute regarding to kashmir today.
 
.
Maharaja was hindu that's why he demanded indian help

If that was true, then he should have joined India eralier when the request was made without a fuss, prior to the invasion
while more than 70% people of kashmir wanted to join pakistan.

I didn't recall a poll taken for Kashmiri opinions back then
 
.
PAF will always be superior. To be frank your economy can do nothing about it.
even if the quality and quantity differences keeps on increasing,u will still deny IAF superiority,so i cant do anything,maybe someday someone will help u:hitwall:
 
.
Can somebody tell this fool S-19 how Pakistan whipped Indian father, Russia's *** in Afghanistan during the eighties?

India may have superior fighters, but their pilots and tactics are no match for Pakistan.


Ask your ruski daddies, S-19.

regarding to afganistan war,an mig-23 pilot got kill of a Pakistani f-16,where mig-23 was a ground attack jet...so much for pilot training.

To be honest the days of light fighters are gone. The future sky belongs to fighters like this. Modern fighter need to carry power radars and internal rocket camber if possible. That requires a large body.

nope...maintaining stealth jets is too costly.and nobody uses medium or heavy jet fighters for air policing.so,light aircraft will hang around a little time more.
 
.
regarding to afganistan war,an mig-23 pilot got kill of a Pakistani f-16,where mig-23 was a ground attack jet...so much for pilot training.

Russian/Afghani Aircrafts: SU-22, SU-25, Mig-23, AN-24, AN-26 (Shot down)
Indian Aircrafts: UAV (shot down), Mirage 2000, SU-30, Mig-29 (locked on and chased)
RAF: Eurofighter Typhoon (Shot down)

Good training by PAF F-16 pilots... :D


Future:

36+ Advanced F-16 block 52, 40+ F-16 MLU Block 40, 50 new JF-17 block 3, 150 new J-10B fighters are being procured to counter IAF's 126 Rafale and 130 Su-30MKI....

200+ JF-17 block 1 and block 2 will do the job against IAF's 49 Mirage 2K, 67 Mig 29, ? Hal Tejas...
 
.
If that was true, then he should have joined India eralier when the request was made without a fuss, prior to the invasion


I didn't recall a poll taken for Kashmiri opinions back then

70% of all muslims included kashmir voted for pakistan in 1947.
 
.
70% of all muslims included kashmir voted for pakistan in 1947.
but now time has changed,i dont think except 2-5 percent of the kashmiri rest want to join pakistan,but this things dont matter any more,kashmir maybe emotionally attached to pakistan but now it has become the pride of India and it can no way afford to lose it,so things will never change i guess as neither side want to lose it
 
.
Maharaja was hindu that's why he demanded indian help while more than 70% people of kashmir wanted to join pakistan.

Well, he had no option really.. If Pakistan was the attacker, there was only India left to ask help from.. Actually if Jinnah had not blundered into that attack, the 70% vote of the population would have probably resulted in whole of Kashmir to go to Pakistan.. But then you pay for your leaders' mistake.. Jinnah's in Kashmir and Ayub Khan's in Bangladesh and Zia in Afghanistan...
 
.
Its all those low cost and maintanence JF-17 jets that is increasing PAF amount of squadrons

Wrong..Kashmir was not with India before 1948 war..since Pakistan attacked Kashmir..India got reason to capture Kashmir...and when India reached Kashmir...Pakistan already capture 75% of Kashmir..and then India pushed Pakistan back to 20% of Kashmir.... If Pakistan would have not gone for this war..there were good chance that 100% Kashmir could be Pakistan side...so due to this war India got a case....thanks to Pakistan...India have 80% of Kashmir. Later India captured Siachen because India knew Pakistan will give it China and it will be very bad situation for India

Pakistan got 20% Kashmir...give it to anybody who cares...you wont get anymore of Kashmir

Interesting, why do Pakistan capture land and then give it to China for?

Is this to repay China, for giving them guns and bullets during the war?
 
.
To be honest the days of light fighters are gone. The future sky belongs to fighters like this. Modern fighter need to carry power radars and internal rocket camber if possible. That requires a large body.
Tell that to JF-17 fans as well....Anyhow light fighters are hot and will remain hot due to their cost effectiveness. Had that not been the case you would have seen every American Fighter plane being replaced by Raptor...large number of light fighters with a decent size of heavy fighters gives you a perfect mix of lethal power and cost effectiveness...However one need to see with clear eyes and think with a clear mind...
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom