What's new

Pakistan Air Force offered CH5 and HALE UAV's

.
i think we should stand over food we already have success in loaded drone soon we will reach high quality if we continue work on it
 
.
Oh please don't divulge all the information, Indians must be very grateful for your valuable contribution


Some information I have recieved, recently Pakistan has been offered patnership in CH5 project, also been given presentation on strategic UAV projects.

Also new Swimmer delivery projects for special forces.

According to info China has made massive inroads into Underwater unmanned vessels also.
 
. . . .
CH-5

--

unmanned autonomous underwater..

SIA with vertical flat design, 4500m depth
veYmfaj.jpg

CSu1wgZ.jpg


qianlong; 1,500 kilograms, depth 6,000-meter-rated, 24 hours endurance
3JkRdTN.jpg

0KablPG.jpg


sea swallow underwater glider, 30 days endurance, 1000km range
QCrvoOS.jpg

wFG0Gtc.jpg

--

manned submersible with 11000m depth rated
MLKoHwm.jpg

qdgAyjp.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan should work on both drone technology and attack helicopter technology! they can be used against any Indian buildup on borders. Any blitzkrieg or Cold Start needs several helis and CAS jets to cope with armor advance.

But in 2006 Israel-Lebanon war Hezbollah had no attack helis, no attack drone and no air force,, they just had Kornet-E anti tank missile and they just devastated the israeli merkava armored assault with their one and only weapon. That war proved that the armored assault can be dead stopped with anti tank missiles, and pakistan has airforce, attack helis, armed drones, anti tank missiles, mines, artillery, mlrs, and tanks to stop the advance of indian armor.

And an Israeli Colonel said after the war that "The best tank in the world "Merkava" cannot stand a chance against a "Half Shaheed". It will not be a walk in the park for indian armor to advance into Pakistani territory.
 
.
A good decision, it would be an essential tool in the upcoming battle at western borders.



Cock, seriously I hope you were drunk LOL
China also devel
But in 2006 Israel-Lebanon war Hezbollah had no attack helis, no attack drone and no air force,, they just had Kornet-E anti tank missile and they just devastated the israeli merkava armored assault with their one and only weapon. That war proved that the armored assault can be dead stopped with anti tank missiles, and pakistan has airforce, attack helis, armed drones, anti tank missiles, mines, artillery, mlrs, and tanks to stop the advance of indian armor.

And an Israeli Colonel said after the war that "The best tank in the world "Merkava" cannot stand a chance against a "Half Shaheed". It will not be a walk in the park for indian armor to advance into Pakistani territory.
InshaAllah, they will not get a walk in the park! we have confidence on our sepoys and sowars!

Israel's case is slightly different, the terrain is different. Use of terrain in armor and mechanized warfare is deadly important. Pakistan have many such gateways and corridors from where a tank advance is suitable. Phillaura and Burki were captured by Indians due to that terrain. Canals surely stops them but some important cities don't have rivers or canals as hurdles. Anyway, our army is a professional army and we excelled in conventional warfare. We are just analyzing possibilities here.
 
.
We really need a long endurance high Altitude UCAV so as to keep monitoring almost 24/7 and respond to CPEC route esp the EZs in shortest possible time in case of any eventuality.
 
. . .
Thanks Habibi i expect that kind of news from you, May the almighty bless you are your familly, ameen.

BTW are you talking baout this CH-5?
New CH-5 drone can carry 8 AR-1 missiles and FT-7 bombs|WCT
Résultats Google Recherche d'images correspondant à http://www.defenseworld.net/uploads//news/big/ch_5_rain_1441189979.jpg
this is what I will like
jet powered with delta wings and internal weapon bays ( if possible) and folding wings for ease of transport and concealment.

day and night all weather mission and laser guided bombs and missiles as arsenal.
 
.
.
.
Back
Top Bottom