What's new

Pakistan aims to steer US policy while declaring Taliban truce

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan aims to steer US policy while declaring Taliban truce

Trefor Moss JDW Asia-Pacific Editor - London

Key Points

A high-level Pakistani delegation has travelled to Washington to participate in a crucial US government policy review

In Pakistan the army has ended all operations against militants following ceasefires in Bajaur and Swat


Pakistan's army chief, General Ashfaq Kiyani, and Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi arrived in Washington, DC, on 22 February to provide Pakistani input into the Obama administration's continuing policy review on Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Their talks with senior US officials came as the Pakistani military ceased all active operations against indigenous Taliban militants, a Pakistani army spokesman told Jane's on 26 February.

A ceasefire in the Swat valley, which was established in mid-February, was continuing to hold, the military spokesman said, with no violence being reported between militants and government troops. Local Taliban leader Sufi Mohammed said on 24 February that "successful talks" were continuing with the government on the establishment of Shariah law in Swat in exchange for an indefinite cessation of violence.

The Swat truce was followed by the announcement of a ceasefire in the Bajaur agency of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas on 24 February. The army spokesman confirmed that the truce was "so far only temporary", but that it could be extended as a "goodwill gesture" towards the people of Bajaur following seven months of army operations there.

The end of operations in both Swat and Bajaur means there are no longer any active fronts in the Pakistan army's campaign against militancy.

Exiled Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar, who is thought to be hiding in Pakistan, issued a statement on 25 February calling for "mujahideen" to end their attacks on Pakistani forces and unite "to liberate Afghanistan from the occupation forces", adding to Western unease surrounding the ceasefire.

With allied casualties in Afghanistan having already reached unprecedented levels in the first two months of 2009, there are concerns that Pakistan-based fighters will only intensify their attacks in Afghanistan if they are not actively engaged by the Pakistani army.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Qureshi reacted to the controversy over the US policy of conducting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) strikes inside Pakistan by urging the US to give Pakistan UAVs of its own.

"We feel that if the technology is transferred to Pakistan, Pakistan will be in a better position to determine how to use the technology and, without alienating people, achieve the objective," he said in Washington on 25 February.

The government's credibility on the issue of the UAV strikes has been seriously damaged by its admission that the US has been using a base in the Pakistani province of Balochistan. Satellite images also revealed the existence of a newly built hangar at the base and this has fuelled suspicions that the US is launching its UAV operations from inside Pakistan - something the government has repeatedly denied.

© 2009 Jane's Information Group
 
.
Obama has to change his strategy towards Pakistan and Afghanistan. Let Pakistan operate those drones let Pakistan hit the right targets without Collateral Damage, Bush has Failed in his Approach to deal with Pakistan and Afghanistan and if Obama really wants a change he has his chance now.
 
.
Obama has to change his strategy towards Pakistan and Afghanistan. Let Pakistan operate those drones let Pakistan hit the right targets without Collateral Damage, Bush has Failed in his Approach to deal with Pakistan and Afghanistan and if Obama really wants a change he has his chance now.
This is sensitive technology that is not available for transfer to Pakistan.
 
. .
This is sensitive technology that is not available for transfer to Pakistan.

Well if India can get Hands on Sensitive technologies Like P-8I, Phalcon AWACS Systems, MRCA( Probably American F-18 E/F or F-16 Block 70) and Anti Ballistic Missile defence system then why Pakistan cant even get something like Predator at least not REAPER.
 
.
Not any more sensitive than what is in a blk-52 F-16 aircraft.
That decision isn't up to you. The powers-that- be have already deemed this technology unsuitable for transfer to Pakistan despite numerous pleas. They must have their reasons.

metalfalcon said:
Well if India can get Hands on Sensitive technologies Like P-8I, Phalcon AWACS Systems, MRCA( Probably American F-18 E/F or F-16 Block 70) and Anti Ballistic Missile defence system then why Pakistan cant even get something like Predator at least not REAPER.
India =/= Pakistan.
 
.
Not any more sensitive than what is in a blk-52 F-16 aircraft.

the F16 are comming out of service to make more room in the budget for F22, because of the efficency of smart bombs,, bigger bomb racks are being added to the present USA F16 and down sizeing the numbers of F16s, they are just not needed any longer....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom