roadrunner
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,696
- Reaction score
- 0
Yaar lets refrain from posting stuff that cannot be proven, factual or lacking reference. Its all a matter of perception. The other side believes otherwise and so do many in Pakistan.
That's fine. The whole world can believe something is not true, but that doesn't mean one person's (or perhaps more person's) opinions are incorrect. Whilst it cannot be proven, it is possible to use indirect evidence and conclude from those. This is known as circumstantial evidence and can usually be allowed in courts to secure convictions. So I don't see anything wrong with it.
My own take on this quality issue is something that can be gleaned from the world of sports. Some times they win (being the better side) and sometimes we win. I do not see training wise why the two Armies would be any different.
Indian Army is not a derivative of the martial races generally. The Pakistani Army is staffed with a predominance of the martial characteristics. This means that Pakistani Army is more naturally warlike and aggressive in battle. The martial races were according to the British more courageous, loyal, self sufficient, physically better, hard working, and were better fighters. This isn't even my opinion. This is the opinion the British Army had, and they performed several unbiased analyses of South Asian physiques and personalities.
Taking the example from the world of sports, if you look at the boxers (and this is the closest to warriorship you will get in sports), the Pakistani boxers always whip the Indian boxers. Usually there is a whitewash in the South Asian Games with Pakistani boxers winning all the medals. Cricket requires more finesse, a weak poorly built, non aggresive batsman and bowler can become formidable due to technique and finesse. This is not a requirement or a characteristic of the martial races (though it doesn't necessarily mean they cannot possess them).
Also by posting something such as the above, you have made it very easy for the thread to get derailed. So lets be careful about making such claims when you cannot back it and then in the end, all of the Pakistanis get a bad name for such ridiculous comments. I had been discussing this nasty 1:10 slogan on other threads suggesting that even within the Army there is no one going around suggesting this at an institutional level (personal views of a few cannot be representative of the entire institution and even if they are voiced then its sheer stupidity and fairly unprofessional assesment), so lets avoid such claims.
Thanks
I don't represent anyone but myself. Should any Pakistani feel ashamed of the comments I make, then it is most unfortunate, because we are all individuals with individual characters. You do no have to believe in all the things I believe, but they are beliefs which I don't think one can just disregard given that the history of the subcontinent right up to the 3 Indo-Pak wars. The Iraq-Kuwait scenario resembles the Indo-Pak scenario, but with completely different results. One has to ask why, and I don't see there being any other reason.
On the subject of derailments, that's true. But you're the mod, so delete them if you like. I think the evidence is quite clear from the historical results of battle. I am relieved of course the Pakistani military does not believe in it, and is a politically correct institution, as they should be.