What's new

Pakistan agreed to send about 5.000 soldiers to KSa-Yemen Border

Status
Not open for further replies.
god saudis spend more on some cheap prostitues now our leaders have turned our military in to rent a mujra army. fcuk saudis zionist bas tards.

looks we also part of new world order in disguise.
 
. .
That is Bull Chit.

Tit Chit the only thing that will come out is Pakistani soldiers getting pay but the cream scopped up by military elite.

Pakistan cannot impact anything.

Military Mafia Milking More $$$$.

Nothing for Pakistan or Pakistani soldiers.

We are not going to get anything or change anything by standing about

So stop standing about

You need to take positive steps for the future


You are right there but you miss the bigger point here. Countries can adopt roughly three postures. Pro, neutral or against. Take UK. It has a pro preferance to Poland, Estonia or Latvia attendant to being fellow Europeans. UK has neutral posture toward Pakistan and against Iran. The manifestation of pro preferance (or brotherhood) with Poland etc is seen across the board. UK deploys soldiers to Poland as part of NATO. UK has taken millions of Polish workers - good, bad and ugly. So if KSA has a preferance for Pakistan where is it exactly? If you are selective then your not being preferential. The two have entirely differant meaning. Brotherly suggest doing something even when you get a better deal elsewhere. That is preferance. If KSA was preferantial to Pakistan it would select Pak even when it could get a better deal elsewhere. I hope that make sense to you.

If KSA or GCC pick Indian worlers because they are better where the hell is the brotherhood then?

If we want GCC to harm india or indian workers for us then we need to be important enough to make that demand
 
.
May be you're right...may be you're wrong...Marshal Law is history now...Army is not stupid to enforce marshal law...they have learnt from mistakes...

As far as Yemen is concerned, who says Pakistani troops will step in Yemen? but may be other armies will step in yemen...Remember, 41 countries alliance...

If Pakistani Army is not going to Yemen then who are we going to fight there are no terrorist organizations in Saudia.

Parliament will not allow the deployment of troops in Saudia it will be rejected. So sending troops is only possible under Marshal Law. If Marshal law is not coming then no troops are going.
 
. .
I m the chutiy@ who has complete loyalty with Pakistan...I disagreed with but respected Pakistan's decision when Pakistan refused KSA on yemen issue two years ago...

Now...I support Pakistan on this stance which my country has taken...I won't threaten my country nor will allow anyone to do that...



This mercenary army will save your *** from India when need arises...they are still protecting you so that you can easily bark at them....COWARD !!!

Than you are Pakistan Chu ( no offense ) , if Pakistan made a decision that make us close to KSA, the Shia go crazy over it, and if we make a decision that make us close to Iran, the Wahabi go crazy .. Fcuk Shia Fcuk Sunni , Fcuk the division ..
 
.
If Pakistani Army is not going to Yemen then who are we going to fight there are no terrorist organizations in Saudia.

Parliament will not allow the deployment of troops in Saudia it will be rejected. So sending troops is only possible under Marshal Law. If Marshal law is not coming then no troops are going.

:rofl: Our troops are already deployed in KSA...How may times I will tell you this? Has this news just damaged your brain cells?

ISI knows better than you whether any terrorist organization exists in KSA or not...
 
.
@MastanKhan Your dream became reality. GJ! Although 5k is too low, pak should consider sending closer to 50k.
If GCC kicked all the Indian workers out and or gave preferance to Pak workers (like EU does to it's citizens) I would be for sending 500,000 soldiers or the entire Pak Army to KSA. Leave the nukes to hold off India with one guy with finger on the trigger. Meantime wait for extra $35 billion (workers remittances) to pour into Pakistan every year causing a massibve economic boom with GDP growth hitting 8%. Even the airline indistry would take off as millions of more passenger traffic would be generated. It would cause a economic boom in Pakistan. This boom would go on year after year and within decade would lift Pakistan to another level.

That would be worth deploying entire Pakistan Army and even if needed fighting in Yeman in full scale combat to defeat the Houthis. I am partial to Iran but sorryin this context - the economic dividend would have strategic benefits for Pakistan. The improved economy would afford the country to spend more on defence and buy big ticket items from it's own treasury. That would be worth annoying Iran. What do they say about nations? They only have interests.
 
.
I m the chutiy@ who has complete loyalty with Pakistan...I disagreed with but respected Pakistan's decision when Pakistan refused KSA on yemen issue two years ago...

Now...I support Pakistan on this stance which my country has taken...I won't threaten my country nor will allow anyone to do that...



This mercenary army will save your *** from India when need arises...they are still protecting you so that you can easily bark at them....COWARD !!!

We did what this army couldn't and can't do which is liberate azad Kashmir.
 
.
:rofl: Our troops are already deployed in KSA...How may times I will tell you this? Has this news just damaged your brain cells?

ISI knows better than you whether any terrorist organization exists in KSA or not...
Pakistani instructors are deployed in Saudia not troops that are fighting on the front lines.
 
.
As far as I can tell, this news may not be true. There are no indications to suggest Pakistan is sending any soldiers to KSA, at least not in fighting roles.

If troops are being sent, they're being sent as trainers and border protection forces. Likely, they'd be replacing Pakistani soldiers already there, but only if this news is even true.

[Edit]: I should add, 5000 troops is nowhere near enough for combat operations, the size of which KSA is asking troops for. The Saudis want a ground invasion force, and 5000 troops is nothing.
 
.
Than you are Pakistan Chu ( no offense ) , if Pakistan made a decision that make us close to KSA, the Shia go crazy over it, and if we make a decision that make us close to Iran, the Wahabi go crazy .. Fcuk Shia Fcuk Sunni , Fcuk the division ..

No offense taken...but thing is a sect can't dictate policy...Shias if unable to live in sunni majority countries, they should, saying with high regret move to Iran immediately...They will live happily over there...

It is the habit of their morons to try to give sectarian angle to everything...Pakistan sees geopolitics not sects ...
 
.
If Saudia wants ISI deployed in Saudia I will happily support that decision. lol
 
. .
If GCC kicked all the Indian workers out and or gave preferance to Pak workers (like EU does to it's citizens) I would be for sending 500,000 soldiers or the entire Pak Army to KSA. Leave the nukes to hold off India with one guy with finger on the trigger. Meantime wait for extra $35 billion to pour into Pakistan every year causing a massibve economic boom with GDP growth hitting 8%. Even the airline indistry would take off as millions of more passenger traffic would be generated. It would cause a economic boom in Pakistan. This boom would go on year after year and within decade would lift Pakistan to another level.

That would be worth deploying entire Pakistan Army and even if needed fighting in Yeman in full scale combat to defeat the Houthis. I am partial to Iran but sorryin this context - the economic dividend would have strategic benefits for Pakistan. The improved economy would afford the country to spend more on defence and buy big ticket items from it's own treasury. That would be worth annoying Iran. What do they say about nations? They only have interests.

You and I both know that isn't going to happen. You seem to like iran as a reaction to GCC treatment of pakistan. iran is much worse that any GCC.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom