RoYaL~GuJJaR
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,370
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Inshallah!!! Ghazwa-e-Hind is near!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Inshallah!!! Ghazwa-e-Hind is near!!
Inshallah!!! Ghazwa-e-Hind is near!!
Allah too is on our side brother!! Dont worry, ghazwa-e-hind is just about to happen.bhagwan is on our side
Allah too is on our side brother!! Dont worry, ghazwa-e-hind is just about to happen.
@third eye
1) Muslims have been united before sam way Germany has. Just like that, Germany before the empire has been divided for a while and it is through the Prussians they reunited again.
3) This scenario assumes Pakistan control and rallying support for a war is doable, especially if Pakistan plays like Muslims were robbed by the Indians.
4) again Pakistan must be the dominate force, and the union must have certain rules that guarantees Pakistan say in matters of dispute. .
. Allah hu akbar !!! Its already ready brother. Let the ghazwa e hind begin.inshallah, i suggest you to prepare for our welcome and raise Pakistani flag
Funny fact is I dont see an Indian post a picture like this here.65 years waste and still dont know the lesson.pathetic.
mashallah, please support ghazwa e hind
Let's go twenty years back of the battle of Ayn al-Jalut.When the Mongols retreated to Russia in 1242 after their failed invasion of Europe which brought nothing significant to their treasury as they thought it would have before their attack, the Mongol officers stationed in Crimea struck a deal with Italian merchants. In exchange of large amount of trade goods, the Mongols allowed their European prisoners to sale as slaves in the Mediterranean markets, most of them were sold to the Sultan of Egypt. Sultan's army were composed of Kipchaks (one particular clan of the Turks, who previously refused to fight the Mongols few years back) and the Slavs who had plenty of experiences in fighting the Mongols in Europe.
Why I criticized the examples of Ottomans brought here was the misconception of Muslim unity in spite of the age old rivalry and traditional political attrition among Muslims themselves. The points to bolster Op's arguments are weak and vulnerable due to historical facts. That was the context of my post.
You are wrong.
May be I am wrong. But hard to believe Mr.Jack Weatherford will be wrong too. The Mongol penetration could not be checked by the so called "Islamic spirit" as you claim when Helagu's army defeated the Nizari Ismailis in Alamut and captured Assassin's castle.No other Muslim state responded to the plea of Caliph of Baghdad when he called for an all out Jihad against the Mongols.The fact is the Mongols reached their zenith and they simply couldn't go beyond the region they have reached. And about this time they lost one of their finest general Mongke Khan in far east. There were reasons why the Mongols were invincible in Europe and Arab. About the time they fought near the sea of Galilee, they lost their primary advantages.Several reasons played for the defeat of the Mongols but an unified Islamic spirit hardly played any role.
@KingMamba
My view is quite opposed to the notion that it was the "Islamic Spirit" that checked the Mongol penetration in Middle East as there are several vital tactical factors played against the invaders. So we can agree to disagree and stick to our own ideas here.