What's new

Pak warned of dire consequences if India attacked: Ex-Obama aide

Status
Not open for further replies.
China has been very smart, by proliferating to Pakistan they have turned the India-Pakistan border into a nuclear war zone.

There is every possibility that China will station their nuclear assets and technicians on Pakistani soil, so that they can inflict maximum damage on India.

However, they may not stop at that, India must be prepared for China entering the war directly with full aggression.

In your dreams we will clear/saff your country if any attempt of war done.
 
.
It is not us who are boasting about "surgical strikes" in response to the Mumbai attacks. :lol:

Don't tell me that the CPC forced you guys to make such pathetic boasts?

You have only yourselves to blame if the most dangerous border in the world goes nuclear.

China has boldly protected Pakistani non-state actors such as the Jamaat-ud-Dawa at the UN. China will not hesitate to enter an India-Pakistan conflict with full aggression.
 
.
The only reason US is attacking Pakistan is because we are looking out for our own interests, instead of their interests. It would be absurd to claim the opposite.

Either your basket of answer have emptied or you need some rest.
US tried helping Pak by giving funds and even against India many times but it was Pak who still supported some terror organisations (mostly anti Indian ) hence such a step not everyone is stupid and selfish like China.
 
.
And if they dare to respond, they risk turning the most dangerous border in the world, between India and Pakistan, into a nuclear warzone. So Indians will keep taking it, for as long as is required.

Why just India and Pakistan, Chinese will participate with full force.
 
. .
You speak as if we are so powerful that we can control the destinies of other nations. :lol:

India was the one who started the problems in the subcontinent, now they are coming back to roost. Our only addition to the mix was helping Pakistan to acquire nuclear weapons.

Now ask the Pakistanis if that was a good thing or a bad thing from their perspective. :azn:

As you mentioned Chinese nationalist hysteria will force the government of China to enter the war with full aggression.
 
.
Whether you believe it or not, you'll never know the truth since you're too afraid to respond to Pakistan, even after making so many threats regarding Mumbai. :azn:

Absolutely correct. It is Chinese nuclear technology that protects the Lashkar-e-Toiba on the ground in Pakistan, and it is the Chinese veto that has protected them at the UN. As you mentioned, Chinese nationalist hysteria will make China enter any conflict directly and fully.

---------- Post added at 03:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:19 PM ----------

Because Indians like to cry about "surgical strikes" in response to Mumbai, yet they know that this crying is only increasing the chances of a conflict in the subcontinent. Which will turn the "most dangerous border in the world", into a nuclear war zone.

If India truly cared about avoiding such a nuclear war in the subcontinent, then why are they boasting about attacking Pakistan in response to Mumbai? :no:

Maybe China forced you to issue those boasts?

China should make it clear Jamaat-ud-Dawah is protected by Chinese nuclear technology and Chinese veto. No ifs and no buts.
 
.
India and Pakistan have a similar sized nuclear arsenal. But Pakistan's arsenal is pointed at only one major target (India), so they would be able to use all of them.

India on the other hand, will have to hold back a large proportion of their weapons. Because if India fired their entire stockpile, nothing could stop the PLA from simply marching in, against a now defenceless India.

Pakistan therefore would have more useable nukes than India in this scenario, and their stockpile is increasing faster than anyone else on Earth.

Basically India needs to assume that in any conflict triggered by a Pakistani non-state actor, China will be a belligerent with its entire nuclear arsenal.
 
.
It was not China who turned the India-Pakistan border into "the most dangerous border on Earth". :no:

We just helped the Pakistanis to acquire nuclear weapons. Ask them if that was a good or bad thing?

As you said you will not stop at that. Chinese nationalist hysteria will demand a much more aggressive stand by China.
 
.
LOL, that is funny. :lol:

First you guys complain that the Chinese government is out to get India, and post anti-India articles from the Chinese state media to show this. Since of course those state newspapers are owned by the CPC.

Now when you talk to Pakistani members, suddenly you are saying that China and India have "no enemity"? :P

China is obviously being aggressive as it can be in leiu of the advantages it has in the current world political scenario,

but if we were all hot blooded like we are here,we would all be extinct in no time,no use blinking in a mexican stand off.
 
.
Basically India needs to assume that in any conflict triggered by a Pakistani non-state actor, it will have to face the power of the entire Chinese nuclear arsenal.

No need for it , if you want war you will get it , just try to start war :devil: and then watch what we do.
 
. . . .
India has suffered from Pakistani attacks for years. I would have thought given the recent suffering in Pakistan from the same kind of attacks, that there would be more sympathy for India.

But sadly there are some morally bankrupt people who cheer suicide attacks in Tel-Aviv or Mumbai, but cry when a market is blown up in Islamabad.

Pakistan is a failed state. The path it chose was wrong. All those years of developing terrorism for a patch of disputed land. If Pakistan put as much effort into developing economically as it did developing terrorism - it would be an emerging economic power like India by now.

The path to peace and prosperity is with the west, not Iran, not Taliban or the medieval nutters in your tribal regions.

Another attack on India like the Mumbai attacks will be the end for Pakistan.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom