Pak to raise Modi statements in the UN

[GR!FF!N]

 

[salmanACCA]

our focus will be TTP and BLA and that they are financed by india the same way they financed mukhthi bani

 

[babbar]

our focus will be TTP and BLA and that they are financed by india the same way they financed mukhthi bani

That will find audience if international terrorists were not holding open mass rallies in your capital brandishing guns.

 

[salmanACCA]

That will find audience if international terrorists were not holding open mass rallies in your capital brandishing guns.

if modi can become PM of india then why cant hafiz saeed also room free

 

[Neemo neemo]

Lol, Dehati Aurat

 

[JanjaWeed]

Someone called Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto raised similar concerns pertaining to BD at UN in 1971. What happened next? Oh well..sounds like 44 years is a long time...& some lessons needs to be revised as time passes by.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Which part of his statement does the UN or the rest of the world not already know ?

Pakistan to raise Modi’s statement at UN - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: The prime minister’s adviser on national security and foreign affairs, Sartaj Aziz, on Monday said Pakistan had decided to bring the Indian prime minister’s statement to the notice of the UN.

In his statement, Indian prime minister Narendra Modi had admitted that they played a part in the break-up of Pakistan in 1971.

“We will move the UN,” said Sartaj Aziz while talking to mediapersons at the inaugural session of 10th meeting of Heads of University Grant Commission/Higher Education of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc). He ruled out talks with India on its terms.

“Dialogue with India would be of no use if it does not cover Kashmir and water issues,” he added.

Following Modi’s statement, Islamabad has been urging the international community to take notice of India’s admission to interfering in former East Pakistan, which became Bangladesh in 1971.

“We want a tension-free relationship,” Mr Aziz said, adding but India opted for anti-Pakistan, hawkish and hostile approach.

“They fight elections on the basis of anti-Pakistan statements,” he said.

Published in Dawn, June 16th, 2015

What a waste of resources by Pakistani leadership...the world knows and admires the role India played in liberation of Bangladesh... instead of wasting their time on such issues.. Pakistani leadership should focus on developing their countries and leveraging international forums to their advantage.. instead of behaving like a proverbial Dehati Aurat.

 

[Mutakalim]

Which part of his statement does the UN or the rest of the world not already know ?

World already knew about it, but acceptance of terrorism from Prime Minister of the nation is a big thing.

On topic: Indeed a very good move.

 

[toxic_pus]

Imbecile.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

if modi can become PM of india then why cant hafiz saeed also room free

Because Hafiz Saeed is Chief of Banned organisation...

 

[Bang Galore]

Imbecile.

Yeah, a regular joker this guy. 1971 was when the majority seceded from the minority in Pakistan. What is the complaint of the minority exactly?

 

[FNFAL]

 

[agamdilawari]

@Topic...good for kids. Give ur best shot..hopefully this time you will be taken seriously

“They fight elections on the basis of anti-Pakistan statements,” he said.

Go see the videos of 100s of rallies Modi did before general elections and how many times did he actually mentioned Pakistan 2 ? 3 ? lets say 10...out of 300-400 ? morons of highest order !!

 

[Srinivas]

Pakistan is shooting its own foot.

India and Bangladesh would drag Pakistan to ICJ over Pakistan Army's genocide on East Pakistan. The blood telegram alone would be disastrous for Pakistani foreign policy!

This is what India should do !

No one should get away from their crimes !

Pakistani army personal who are involved in the genocide and crimes in 1971 must be put under trial by ICJ.

 

[third eye]

World already knew about it, but acceptance of terrorism from Prime Minister of the nation is a big thing.

.

Quite like acceptance of crossing the LC in contravention of the Simla Accord by Mush ?