What's new

Pak Responds: FO call's Mullen's bluff, No evidence shared with us.

just empty chest thumping,you cant do anything...they are superior in any military equipment;)

If your logic was correct, the Afghan war would already have been over & the Taliban wouldn't be getting stronger in Afghanistan like they are right now.
 
.
They are nothing but just war of words. Because just few days ago Obama approved another $1 billion as aid to Pakistan.


It's not really aid but money reimbursed to Pakistan for its expenses which is $100 million below Obama's request.
 
.
If your logic was correct, the Afghan war would already have been over & the Taliban wouldn't be getting stronger.

i meant to say,

1)airstrikes will take place.Do u have any answer??
2)you cant go nuke option,They also have superior.
3)They can block your navy.can u??
4)I doubt even ur army go in a-stan and take action against them.


anyway,nothing gonna happen,just few accusations.Your army will sign more deals may be of f-16's and may go for action.
 
.
Is thats the case we will be ready what u think the last stage act was a suprise hell no its was all staged with Pak gov for anyone that tries to hurt our land we are ready for them no matter who they are bring it and they shall see what we do to them... :pakistan:


Make sure your really ready this time :azn: not like last time when you were zzzz
 
.
just empty chest thumping,you cant do anything...they are superior in any military equipment;)

Just like the superior US army is bogged down by the AK-47/RPG-7 yielding Talibans and we know the story of Iraq as well. How the same AK47/RPG-7 yielding Vietnamese made US suffer 60K+ dead and thousands more injured and the billions in cost.


Being superior in weapons and equipment doesn't means you are gonna win each and every time.


Any kind of wrong move will help the militants, as their ranks will swell and they will get more money and weapons, and the fight will go on.

War is not always the only solution of an issue.


Since the US WOT started, more countries have become unstable and militancy has grown many folds rather then being reduced.

You need to tackle the grass root level problem which is causing the militancy, fighting militancy will not solve anything, till the real issue is handled.
 
.
Just like the superior US army is bogged down by the AK-47/RPG-7 yielding Talibans and we know the story of Iraq as well. How the same AK47/RPG-7 yielding Vietnamese made US suffer 60K+ dead and thousands more injured and the billions in cost.


Being superior in weapons and equipment doesn't means you are gonna win each and every time.


Any kind of wrong move will help the militants, as their ranks will swell and they will get more money and weapons, and the fight will go on.

War is not always the only solution of an issue.


Since the US WOT started, more countries have become unstable and militancy has grown many folds rather then being reduced.

You need to tackle the grass root level problem which is causing the militancy, fighting militancy will not solve anything, till the real issue is handled.

no sir ji,i explained later on...
 
.
If your logic was correct, the Afghan war would already have been over & the Taliban wouldn't be getting stronger in Afghanistan like they are right now.

Unlike Afghanistan which does not have a standing army and the fight is between a guerilla terrorist force and a conventional army , in Pakistan, god forbid if it happens, the fight will be between two standing armies and the US will just blitz anything in its way in a conventional war.

Unlike Afghanistan which has no specific targets to bomb Pakistan has plenty of "strategic" targets to employ the B-2 pilots for quite some time.

The US is not wining in Afg not because they cant but because they chose not to go that way.If they had gone the USSR way shooting everything on their way they would have won the war in 3 years.
 
.
Is thats the case we will be ready what u think the last stage act was a suprise hell no its was all staged with Pak gov for anyone that tries to hurt our land we are ready for them no matter who they are bring it and they shall see what we do to them... :pakistan:

lol last time they came, they did their job and left undetected, pak forces were caught napping. its too good to be true though.
 
.
If your logic was correct, the Afghan war would already have been over & the Taliban wouldn't be getting stronger in Afghanistan like they are right now.


They didn't came to fight a war. They came here to hunt down OBL. They came deep inside, Put there leg on OBL chest and shoot him from point Blank range. After killing them they throw him in ocean.

They did, what they came to do. They can leave anytime. Its there greatness that they are still cleaning the "s##t" what was created by ISI and CIA.

They have already told you " Either you are friend or enemy" .. Choice is yours... if you will not kill hakkani group, they will come and kill. They don't respect durand line...
 
.
Indian Amrika kay liye wasay phooth mar teh rehtay hain aaj kal. You Indians should be well aware of the tatics which Pak army impletments. War with Pakistan would be political suicide.
 
.
Indian Amrika kay liye wasay phooth mar teh rehtay hain aaj kal. You Indians should be well aware of the tatics which Pak army impletments. War with Pakistan would be political suicide.

we already know;)dont u ??
 
. .
Nice work Hina!

Pakistan should be very clear cut and very loud on these pathethic allegations by Mike Lullen and US.Can't afford to keep quiet on these

:yahoo:
 
.
Unlike Afghanistan which does not have a standing army and the fight is between a guerilla terrorist force and a conventional army , in Pakistan, god forbid if it happens, the fight will be between two standing armies and the US will just blitz anything in its way in a conventional war.

Unlike Afghanistan which has no specific targets to bomb Pakistan has plenty of "strategic" targets to employ the B-2 pilots for quite some time.

The US is not wining in Afg not because they cant but because they chose not to go that way.If they had gone the USSR way shooting everything on their way they would have won the war in 3 years.

And you think after the US blitz, Pakistanis will shut up and no one will go inside Afghanistan and attack the US targets which are in the shape of precious US personnel ??? US blitz took out Iraqi army, but then again US lost 4000+ troops in Iraq.

And did USSR win after going the way you just mentioned ?? If they didn't, how could the US had won or would win ?? Why didn't US win in Vietnam when they used the same tactics as USSR did to a certain extend.
 
.
And you think after the US blitz, Pakistanis will shut up and no one will go inside Afghanistan and attack the US targets which are in the shape of precious US personnel ??? US blitz took out Iraqi army, but then again US lost 4000+ troops in Iraq.

And did USSR win after going the way you just mentioned ?? If they didn't, how could the US had won or would win ?? Why didn't US win in Vietnam when they used the same tactics as USSR did to a certain extend.

There is no way, any army can win a war of occupation in these times. Punitive expeditions is a different story altogether.. And the same is visible in the excessively low NATO casualties in last 10 years of Afghanistan war..

If (a very big IF) US decides to pursue a hard option in Pakistan, it will imo limited to surgical strikes on HVT (like drones) and taking out of key Pakistani C&C infrastructure using stand off weapons.. Pakistan probably wont even see a US military personnel in clear sights..
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom