sancho
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,011
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
That's it, different aircrafts for different requirement and not really comparable. That's why IN will not only get P8I for maritime patrol and ASW, there is also another competition for a medium range MP aircraft with contenders like:There is little doubt that with higher cruising speed, a jet platform can cover larger area than a comparable propeller aircraft thus one would need fewer jet based MR aircrafts to do the job. As rightly pointed out, Indian has longer coastline to monitor, hence a jet powered platform would be more cost effective. Besides, having a higher maximum speed, P-8 can get out of the way faster than P-3 when faced with hostile aircraft.
PN has had experience with P-3s for almost a decade and have acquired sufficient experience in maintenance & training of the crews. Therefore for our needs P-3s are better suited for the foreseeable future.
ATR 72 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
EADS CASA C-295 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dassault Falcon 900 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Embraer R-99 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
These might be more comparable to P3, but imo there is no real need for a comparison, because they won't fight each other and will do mainly the same job, even if the one can fly faster and the other maybe longer.