What's new

Pak missile launch/storage site capable of firing 44 nukes in one go

Pak launched its first rocket into space in 1961 two years earlier than indians but we left that space programs as it was waste of money and getting on moon doesnt serve any useful purpose here on earth except satisfying fake ego that we got their after 50 years after US and russia..Pak space programs is more focused to serve our needs not fake ego..

Its not about drilling one hole in soft land its about drilling dozens of them in mountains...and if india has anything like this show us ...and yes no need to toll this thread was meant for discussion about missile storage sites and silos and was not an attack on indian ego but what can one say with so many trollers on the loose around with no knowledge of such tech and no heart to accept truth..

Did you know that Indian oil drilling industry is ranked fourth in the whole wide world? Any idea where OGDCL stands?

Mate, don't make every-other thing a competition between India and Pakistan. Try to delink emotions from your cognitive abilities!
 
. .
you guys are just trolling killing discussion..I repeat this thread is about constructing such sites and maintaining them ...Its not about oil and gas as Pak is getting gas and salt from thousands of meters below earth surface and if india has any such missile site or even something comparable show us otherwise just stick to thread..
 
.
Did you know that Indian oil drilling industry is ranked fourth in the whole wide world? Any idea where OGDCL stands?
Mate, don't make every-other thing a competition between India and Pakistan. Try to delink emotions from your cognitive abilities!

Thanks, Hyperion for that "gentle" reminder. Actually the Indian Oil Industry is not only drilling on land; but also in the seas- including the deep sea. This offshore drilling started way back in the 1970s so one can say that a reasonable amount of know-how has been created so far! ;)

But friend Al-Batroos was telling us about HOLES that can only be drilled by lions and not by goats. In India there is no know-how about this kind of stuff.
 
.
you guys are just trolling killing discussion..I repeat this thread is about constructing such sites and maintaining them ...Its not about oil and gas as Pak is getting gas and salt from thousands of meters below earth surface and if india has any such missile site or even something comparable show us otherwise just stick to thread..

No sir we place and store our missiles on terrace of military institutions. This backward we Indians are :cry:
 
.
Indian generals and defence analysts have repeatedly said that India should call Pakistan's nuclear bluff and they feel that a limited war under nuclear overhang is possible. They also say that while India is preparing against China, Pakistan’s nuclear threat would automatically be taken care of. They also say that if Pakistan launches a nuclear strike on India, the return Indian strike would eliminate Pakistan from the face of the earth.

That is why, in my opinion, to attain a credible minimum deterrence against a bigger country like India, Pakistan should have a minimum of 500 nuclear weapons. In a first strike Pakistan should be able to take out close to 400 major minor Indian cities. Let them strike back with whatever is left behind.

India does have silos in NE India as well as Andaman and Nicobar. There were news reports of nuclear presence in Bhutan as well. Indian nuclear launch infrastructure is fairly developed. This not say that Pakistan is left behind in any way. The site shown may be one of the many many many more, which may not be known.
 
.
you guys are just trolling killing discussion..I repeat this thread is about constructing such sites and maintaining them ...Its not about oil and gas as Pak is getting gas and salt from thousands of meters below earth surface and if india has any such missile site or even something comparable show us otherwise just stick to thread..

OK! no more 'pole(missile) in a hole' joke......

Let me ask you a serious question.....

You said that, those massive missile storage and launching facilities are not for India but for Israel.....BUT do Pakistan have a pole...oops...sorry......a missile that can carry the Nukes that far.....:coffee:
 
.
Indian generals and defence analysts have repeatedly said that India should call Pakistan's nuclear bluff and they feel that a limited war under nuclear overhang is possible. They also say that while India is preparing against China, Pakistan’s nuclear threat would automatically be taken care of. They also say that if Pakistan launches a nuclear strike on India, the return Indian strike would eliminate Pakistan from the face of the earth.

That is why, in my opinion, to attain a credible minimum deterrence against a bigger country like India, Pakistan should have a minimum of 500 nuclear weapons. In a first strike Pakistan should be able to take out close to 400 major minor Indian cities. Let them strike back with whatever is left behind.

India does have silos in NE India as well as Andaman and Nicobar. There were news reports of nuclear presence in Bhutan as well. Indian nuclear launch infrastructure is fairly developed. This not say that Pakistan is left behind in any way. The site shown may be one of the many many many more, which may not be known.

The highlighted part is the reason why we need sites capable of firing dozens of missiles together and are closely located so that they can hit targets simultaneously..
 
. .
OK! no more pole(missile) in a hole joke......

Let me ask you a serious question.....

You said that, those massive missile storage and launching facilities are not for India but for Israel.....BUT do Pakistan have a pole...oops...sorry......a missile that can carry the Nukes that far.....

Pakistan's nuclear programme is India specific and is not aimed against any other country.
 
.
^^^^Oh! I forgot.......If any other country Nukes you , you'll Nuke India......:lol:
 
.
But friend Al-Batroos was telling us about HOLES that can only be drilled by lions and not by goats. In India there is no know-how about this kind of stuff.
Buddy, you're a senior member. You should follow the decorum and not engage kids!
 
.
Pakistan's nuclear programme is India specific and is not aimed against any other country.

Then why did AlBatroos talk about "Israel and its friends" as potential targets? There must be some reason for that.
 
.
The highlighted part is the reason why we need sites capable of firing dozens of missiles together and are closely located so that they can hit targets simultaneously..

Wrong. You don't need to keep closely co-located sites to hit different targets simultaneously. The engagement of different targets may be dependent on missile range, type of warhead, type of effect needed to be generated and much more.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom