Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Sir ji wah hai, yani thapper bhi mar dia aur excuse bhi ker lia
Yea woh nasal hey.....moun mey ram ram , bughal mein churi. !!
Aub jesey ko tesa. !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sir ji wah hai, yani thapper bhi mar dia aur excuse bhi ker lia
A fascinating post. In earlier years, one could see posters realistic about the events of the various military confrontations, though unable to romanticize their past and dwell lovingly on a mythology built over the ages.
Now it is different. With every passing year, as those who lived through those actual events die out, there is more and more denial at fundamental level about military matters, rather more realism about the past.
Incorrect, Muslims are the most targeted humans on earth today. Who is a real terrorist, a person who drops thousands of bombs on civilians or a civilian who fights illegal invading forces?
Sir ji wah hai, yani thapper bhi mar dia aur excuse bhi ker lia
Ok if this incorrect so why muslim targeting muslim, kid blowing the mosque and Pathan killing Muhajir in Pakistan. Now few hour ago attack on Kabul , means Muslim kill Muslim is perfectly fine. Actually you don't follow the land rule and just forcing yours when your number increase. Just see the account who killed most muslim: Muslim itself, Hindu, Christian, jews or any other. Compare to muslim population Hindu number is nothing and still you have problem with us. If some thing happen you people put religion directly into that particular incident without a single blink. Their no place in the world where you don't have any issue, try to be an human, well all muslim are not same.
You must watch. All you get and feed with lies from begging to show how Indian and specially Hindu your enemy in first place.
Hassan Nisar slaps Laal Topi Zaid Hamid - YouTube
Yea woh nasal hey.....moun mey ram ram , bughal mein churi. !!
Aub jesey ko tesa. !!
Do you mean that Hindus don't kill other Hindus or Jews don't kill other Jews or that Christians don't kill other Christians? And is it not also a fact that the US, a Christian country, has executed more humans then either Muslims or Jews or Hindus?
Should India not be conceived as an enemy when she has illegal occupation of Pakistani land (Jammu Kashmir) and when she is involved in unrest in the country through terrorism (BLA/TTP etc.)?
I could reply with like.....
All the Hindus are not idiots but most idiots tend to be Hindus, however i'll not lower my self to your despicable level.
BTW, when did the likes of Col. Shrikant Prasad Purohit and co. converted to become a Muslim. !!
If the militia bolted that fast, how come we still hold over 1/3rd Kashmir? Not very smart making false claims right? But my insistence was on the fact that Pakistani Military was led by a British who refused Jinnah's orders to engage Indian Army. It was the Tribals that held their ground and repulsed multiple Indian Army's attempts to capture all of Kashmir.
God.....what will we get out of the wikimania! So the General leading the Army in an intense war was so ill informed that his decision was to call for a cease fire? Lets say that India had used less then 5% of her supplies and Pakistan had exhausted all supplies and that Pak Army was eating grass.......even then, which sane mind can accept that a Military with such overwhelming advantages in her favour would call and agree to a cease fire, especially when it was India that signed the ceasefire a day earlier then Pakistan did!
Oh by the way, the Indian Prime Minister was under so much pressure on that war that he suffered a fatal heart attack the very next day.
Sometimes I do understand that the only way a bully can continue is with false pride, exactly what Indians do. By the time ceasefire was imposed on us, we had liberated almost all of Kashmir and had repulsed Indian advances in Lahore back to the LoC. We were constantly pushing your military back after your military had gained initial advances in areas where battle was not expected. In simple words, Pakistan & India fight over occupation of Kashmir and it was expected that battles would be contained in Kashmir but India crossed the LoC and got upto Lahore as those areas were not defended but when we began our push, the Indians were suddenly in a hurry to sign the ceasefire.
There was a retreat, agreed. But the retreat began only after NS was summoned and ordered to do so by the US. The US obviously was under immense diplomatic pressure from Indian lobby as their military was unable to dislodge the fighters from key positions. A very important position point 5353 is held by Pakistan even today.
How much weight the prime ministers statements hold can be judged by the treatment the same prime minister got from the Army Chief. Any sane person can easily deduce why the exiled ex prime minister would make such statements. Even official Indian tally of martyrs on Pakistani side stand at around 1k. Ofcourse, fact is that around 350 fighters were martyred and most of them were martyred during the retreat and not during actual fighting.
Again, had India been in such a strong position and had it been Pakistan pleading for a CF, India would have ended the episode on her terms but is it not true that Pakistan still holds point 5353? Goes to tell you how good of a position India really was in. Matter of fact, the same Indian Army dared not cross the border just a couple of years later despite tall statements of invasion and then even surgical strikes! Even the so called might SU-30MKI's would disengage immediately as soon as the F-16's would start a chase.
Even in 01/02, India removed her forces from the border unilaterally and unconditionally. Had India held any position of strength against Pakistan unilaterally, India would not have hesitated to cross the LoC. But what my Indian friends may not know, the Indian Army knew that the result would be a Pakistani invasion and liberation of Kashmir and pushing of Indian Army back across the LoC at the very least. You never even gave Pakistan a chance to do that.....mighty Indian!
Read my post again and this time, ask someone to help you understand it.
No, we don't, Kashmir was independent it was not your property. You start sending mujahideen to Kashmir and rioting and robbing the people and showed worst nightmare to Majaraja then he sign with us. We are not there in first place.
Jammu & Kashmir : Spineless India, Toothless UN
Despite of three all out wars between India and Pakistan only one in 1947 was fought by India to regain its own territory illegally occupied by invader Pakistan. On October 22, 1947 Pakistani army disguised as tribals and branded as Mujjahiddins invaded Jammu & Kashmir then an independent princely state ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh. The ruler of Kashmir, who on October 26, 1947 using the provisions of Indian Independence Act 1947 passed by the British Parliament merged his state with India. By virtue of the signed Instrument of Accession, the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir like other more than 500 princely states of pre-partition India became integral part of India. Thereafter Indian army initiated military actions to push out disguised Pakistani army out of own territories in Jammu & Kashmir but before regaining entire territories illegally occupied by Pakistan J. M. Nehru the then Indian prime minister unilaterally declared cease-fire on January 1, 1948.
Thread Jammu & Kashmir : Spineless India, Cunning Pakistan, Toothless UN | Pakistan Defence Forum | BoardReader
if we have a look on the disputes, India has either with Pakistan or China, the position of India is just to live with whatever India has. we lived in a time when people were asking question, "if India was in the good position in 1971 then why full efforts were not made to get the pak's occupied Kashmir? why only freedom of Bangladesh and what India got out of it? and once Pakistan had come in the position to lose, why efforts were not made to get the whole kashmir in 1971, the success or unsuccess was different.........." as India always claimed its right on whole Kashmir....
but Indian position is, as defined by many in India, that, even if India may have to leave whole kashmir then also its good until we may make the rest of India, a 'success' in world. hence we find India has done heavy fencing on the Indo-Pak border, neither India wants to go further nor they want someone to come this side also. also, the best part of India before 1947 in fact went to West Pakistan...... and the same we find Indian attitude towards China also, that is, India is just not interested in getting the land it lost in 1962, but somehow having peace on the chinese border is the main issue. Indian policy is just to maintain its current state and make it better in world.......
and then we find India now having heavy investments in Navy as the bigger challeneges in future is expected from sea. and you are right to say that, "Its the same for every country USA, Russia, China." as, more the other countries increase their defence expenditure, the neighbors also get worried while Indian side just wants to have a strength somewhere in between Pakistan and China only.............
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...itary-expenditure-2011-a-6.html#ixzz22NbX0tvf
Tumhari nasal k liye kuch asia hi hai: Sau chuhe khake billi haj ko chali
Translated in English-- After eating 100 rats, the cat now goes for a pilgrimage"
Tumhari nasal k liye kuch asia hi hai: Sau chuhe khake billi haj ko chali
Translated in English-- After eating 100 rats, the cat now goes for a pilgrimage"
Let the internet Hindus flex their tiny muscles - it's the only place they can do it.
Well our farm has plenty of workers to take care of business, but our profession is to keep watch on the eternal enemy.
Out of 60 pages I have posted how many times?
I remember saying somewhere around 30 that the topic has been discussed already. How many kargil threads are on this forum?
I then continue reading comments from indians trollers about getting f---ed and other crap for pages on end.
Apparently "Professional" members are allowed to troll with their countrymen, while we are supposed to sit back and keep reading this garbage.
TIGER HILL point 5353 is in pakistan controll higest peak in the region
who have clear view on national highway 1.D
You are an incredible Indian idiot.
Hats off to you for your assessment.
Albeit, we are accustomed to the drama queens on the forum, none the less, i don't see any members displaying a self portrait along with their credentials in their profile portfolio. Suffice to add that it's not my opinion but an own goal by some body who must have done his home work.Well, you could, but then that would be an opinion (or a hissy fit) of an anonymous ip address with a face of PAF pilot in his avatar.. What executioner said though, while very misguided and inaccurate, is one of the most viral catch phrases today..
Albeit, we are accustomed to the drama queens on the forum, none the less, i don't see any members displaying a self portrait along with their credentials in their profile portfolio. Suffice to add that it's not my opinion but an own goal by some body who must have done his home work.
90% of Indians are fools: Justice Katju - Hindustan Times
New Recruit
I
In every which way, the Kargil misadventure set Pakistan back so badly that it is unlikely to ever contemplate a repeat of such a low-on-wisdom operation. But then, it doesnt have to: the way its been conducting its anti-India campaigns subsequently, by sponsoring terrorist attacks in Kashmir and in cities across India, has proved far more cost-effective for Pakistan, while still giving it deniability, even if it convinces no one.
| Firstpost[/url]