What's new

Pak. loses 7 billion by avoiding India goods

Those were the Hurriyat leaders, those Islamists who flung acid on young women who wouldn't wear a full burkha, who banned women's bands, who shut down the literary festival in Srinagar. They are not Kashmiris; they are the cancer of Kashmir.



After 27 years of aggression by Pakistan, how much longer should India remain calm?



How and where was this done? Before the recent incidents? Why would India have invited Pakistan into SAARC if the intention was to isolate her?



I quite understand, but what do you think the impact of training and sending across dozens of Punjabis to spread terror in Kashmir every month is likely to do to the region?
Who is trying to isolate Pakistan
East Pakistan
Trying to do same in blouchistan and kpk
Raw and mqm Nexus is exposed

It's not army that want to send locals it's Kashmiri own struggle and any Muslim will go to give strength to there oppressed brother sisters even guy like me..
It's India who forcefully controlling iok
You know v well Kashmiris don't want to be wd India
 
.
Who is trying to isolate Pakistan
East Pakistan

I don't understand.

What did East Pakistan have to do with India isolating Pakistan?

Trying to do same in blouchistan and kpk
Raw and mqm Nexus is exposed

That started, at most, two years ago. If you are not aware of the facts, do not comment. There was no R&W structure in place before Modi. It had been dismantled at the orders of an earlier Indian Prime Minister.

It's not army that want to send locals it's Kashmiri own struggle and any Muslim will go to give strength to there oppressed brother sisters even guy like me..

Then why blame us for calling you terrorists? And how is it that terrorists come across pre-determined routes, with pre-set devices showing them where to go and how to go, and that they have points from which they cross over, at a time when the Pakistan Army resorts to firing and artillery barrages? Is it a coincidence? Dozens of people have testified to the fact that the ISI is actively backing, even organising the training camps for terrorists. How does this contribute to peace?

It's India who forcefully controlling iok

Not at all, there was peace and tranquillity until Pakistan got free of the Afghanistan campaign against the Soviets.

You know v well Kashmiris don't want to be wd India

That is the Hurriyat. I have met dozens of Kashmiris who want nothing to do with bloodshed.
 
.
I don't understand.

What did East Pakistan have to do with India isolating Pakistan?



That started, at most, two years ago. If you are not aware of the facts, do not comment. There was no R&W structure in place before Modi. It had been dismantled at the orders of an earlier Indian Prime Minister.



Then why blame us for calling you terrorists? And how is it that terrorists come across pre-determined routes, with pre-set devices showing them where to go and how to go, and that they have points from which they cross over, at a time when the Pakistan Army resorts to firing and artillery barrages? Is it a coincidence? Dozens of people have testified to the fact that the ISI is actively backing, even organising the training camps for terrorists. How does this contribute to peace?



Not at all, there was peace and tranquillity until Pakistan got free of the Afghanistan campaign against the Soviets.



That is the Hurriyat. I have met dozens of Kashmiris who want nothing to do with bloodshed.
Modi himself said India separated east Pakistan and many other statements
Modi is talking about blouchistan lol don't u see??
So who was doing all this ?isn't it's venom against pak from start ????

Who want bloodshed noone?
Then why 106 dead in Kashmir
India need to change its policy
Modi ideology is same since gujrati genocide of Muslims
 
.
Both India and Pakistan would have access to each others big markets even both countries were on friendly terms, so much money to make but alias
 
.
Modi himself said India separated east Pakistan and many other statements

Of course India did. When did I deny it? My question was different; go back and look at it again, and try to figure it out. If you can't, ask a TTA; they are good at this.

Modi is talking about blouchistan lol don't u see??
So who was doing all this ?isn't it's venom against pak from start ????

From the start? Are you completely ignorant of the march of time? Can you name one mention of Baluchistan before 2016?

Who want bloodshed noone?
Then why 106 dead in Kashmir

Because they were attacking small groups of policemen and soldiers, and would not stop when told to stop. Who is bloodthirsty in that case, the attacker or the defender?

India need to change its policy
Modi ideology is same since gujrati genocide of Muslims

I am beginning to think so. India does need to change her policy. Drastically.

Now go back to the theme. This is not the topic of the thread.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom