What's new

Pak India NSA talks officially called off now: PAK Foreign Office

we have so many haters and bold talkers like her but we never give them any position in gov . i think we should give now some posts to big mouths also .

If you look at her press conference, its very well managed, very well balanced with right set of content and right tone.
Give it an ear just to understand the perspective and directions of talks.
 
.
Bhai jaan, what is gain for pakistan on kashmir..its a lost case....whole world knows about it.. it is not anymore in UN dispute list.. they took it out couple of years ago.. muslim countries give a damn about it... they need indian business. its all about money.

Just go through. indian MEA press brief. you will know. who gained out of it.. i am sure Sartaz Aziz saab got scared the way Sushmaji daid......dossier dedo. hum zinda aadmi khada kar denge as saboot.:haha:. it was a mster stroke from her.
UNMOGIP Background - United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan

If you look at her press conference, its very well managed, very well balanced with right set of content and right tone.
Give it an ear just to understand the perspective and directions of talks.
i am watching this drama since 1990 i remember hundreds of such speeches and threats and so much from india in last 25 years

aar paar ki larai yaad hai ?
Chinks in the armour




DEFENCE

Chinks in the armour

PRAVEEN SWAMI



With its top brass lacking in strategic vision, the Indian military has been unable to make key acquisitions in technology and hardware; even budget allocations for Defence have remained partly unused in recent years.


EXTERNAL Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha has been talking about pre-emptive military strikes on Pakistan. Before him, Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee threatened an "aar paar ki ladai", a war fought deep across the Pakistan border. And before him, Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani threatened to launch "hot pursuit" missions against terrorists across the Line of Control (LoC). Here are some insights into what might happen if politicians actually took their own polemic seriously, and India actually went to war.
 
.
Seriously, those who know what was agreed in UFA and whats Sushma Sawarj said in Press conference, will laugh out at foolishness shown here..
Yes Sushma Swaraj admitted in the press conference that Jammu and Kashmir aka 'atoot ang' is a consistent and essential agenda in the composite dialogue between Pakistan and Ind.
The same govt was pretending hard that Kashmir wasn't an issue worth talking.
That's why we're laughing. Modi govt is duping your hard gains made in the past years :D
Shit ..
 
.
Tame end to this pakistani drama.

Its now established that Nawar Sharif is a worthless "leader" who cannot even honour his own agreements :lol:

What credibility will he ever have in the world again ? :disagree: ........... the world will now acknowledge that the real rulers of pakistan is the Military and the ISI.

Only one question remain. Who is the next dictator of pakistan ?
 
.
Pakistan should be treated the way Isreal treats Palestine......Stop all talks and talk with bullets and counter terror attacks ..lets see who succumbs to this war! India got to be offensive and I guess we can afford to do so!!
 
.
UNMOGIP Background - United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan


i am watching this drama since 1990 i remember hundreds of such speeches and threats and so much from india in last 25 years

aar paar ki larai yaad hai ?
Chinks in the armour





DEFENCE

Chinks in the armour

PRAVEEN SWAMI



With its top brass lacking in strategic vision, the Indian military has been unable to make key acquisitions in technology and hardware; even budget allocations for Defence have remained partly unused in recent years.


EXTERNAL Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha has been talking about pre-emptive military strikes on Pakistan. Before him, Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee threatened an "aar paar ki ladai", a war fought deep across the Pakistan border. And before him, Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani threatened to launch "hot pursuit" missions against terrorists across the Line of Control (LoC). Here are some insights into what might happen if politicians actually took their own polemic seriously, and India actually went to war.

Three words ......... Indus Water Treaty :coffee:
 
.
Pakistan should be treated the way Isreal treats Palestine......Stop all talks and talk with bullets and counter terror attacks ..lets see who succumbs to this war! India got to be offensive and I guess we can afford to do so!!




Thing is Pakistan is not Palestine :tdown::wave:
 
.
Tensions mount between India and Pakistan
By Keith Jones
26 May 1998

Relations between India and Pakistan have rapidly degenerated in the two weeks since the Indian government detonated a nuclear device.

Government officials and political leaders from both countries have made numerous bellicose threats, while Indian and Pakistani troops have exchanged artillery, mortar and small arms fire along the "Line of Control" in Kashmir -- the Himalayan region that was at the center of two of the three Indo-Pak wars.

Speaking to reporters May 18, Indian Home Minister L.K. Advani warned that Pakistan will face "dire consequences" if it continues to support a separatist insurgency in Kashmir. Added Advani, India's "decisive step to become a nuclear state has brought about a qualitatively new stage in Indo-Pak relations, particularly in finding a lasting solution to the Kashmir problem." The Home Minister said the Indian government may soon give its troops a green light to engage in "hot pursuit" of the Kashmiri rebels, that is to cross into the Pakistani-held part of Kashmir.

On Friday, for example, BJP vice-president K.L. Sharma said Pakistan should be "prepared for India's wrath" if it persists with its current "anti-India policy". Meanwhile, India's Tourism and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Madan Lal Khurna issued a statement denying that he had mused about the possibility of a fourth Indo-Pak War in a speech in which he vowed that India was ready to pay "any cost" to end the "proxy war" in the Kashmir.




Tensions mount between India and Pakistan - World Socialist Web Site
 
.
I bet even if terrorism were to be the agenda of the talks,the rats of Modi would still have run away from it.
They know that Pakistani diplomats will bring forth heavy papers of terror tales sponsored by India in Baluchistan and Karachi and crack those papers on Ajit Dovals bald head. !
 
.
Good riddance.

In kay nakhray hi khatam nhn hotay.

They want Indi-Pak talks without any mention of Kashmir...who are they kidding?

Every one knows peace is possible only if kashmir is resolved and India is always ready to discuss Kashmir at foreign secretary level. In UFA it was decided to talk abt terror on NSA level talks. In any case the way both countries agreed for talks half heartedly its better to cancel them as topic of chats are decided behind doors and not through crazy media as has been done in this case.
 
.
Thing is Pakistan is not Palestine :tdown::wave:

because India is not acting like Isreal as yet...! Once India gets offensive it will show you your place, then I guess you wont say this .... India's soft approach has made Pak out of nothing!
 
. .
because India is not acting like Isreal as yet...! Once India gets offensive it will show you your place, then I guess you wont say this .... India's soft approach has made Pak out of nothing!




What are you gonna do? :lol: You think Pakistan won't respond to any of India's offense?
 
. .
Talks can go to hell for good. This issue would be eventually resolved through barrel of the Gun. Those who think Israel and Palestine and in South Asia Pakistan and India issues can get resolved through talks than they are living in fools paradise.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom