Pak. in a losing nuclear race :EDITORIAL: New York Times

[Nilgiri]

Nice thread bump

 

[Dalit]

• Now that Iran nuclear is locked in, Uncle Sam is turning to Pakistan - next on the list.

We're waiting... Let the Americans come.

 

[The Sandman]

Ah necromancers

 

[IceCold]

“It cannot provide adequate services for its citizens” because of the huge allocation for defence.

Are we somehow to believe now that NYT cares about Poor citizens of Pakistan?

 

[Dr Shaheryar]

America has lost various nuclear war heads over the course of history and accusing Pakistan. India lobby at work .

 

[Taimoor Khan]

How can we lose race when Article itself mention that we are about to become the world thrid biggest nuke power after Russia and America. Little Zionist pi** are getting restless and in the process losing all the focus.

 

[xyxmt]

It seems NYT is after pakistan's nukes. So much is being written about pakistan's nuke in NYT these days.

and now we should be scared of NYT

 

[Super Falcon]

Let them bark we are here to keep nukes and these stupid claims weapons fall in terrorists hands there is no guarantee either that US nukes may fall in hands like Donald Trump who is more likely get them and fire them look 1st extremist in USA like Trump and who burns kuran

 

[Cyberian]

Americans whinning as usual, Indians cheerleading them... as usual.

Hasn't the world (or just the US/Hindustan axis) learnt that Pakistan started its nuclear program all the way back 1974, no one was able to stop it back then and no one is going to stop it in the future come what may.

Only way Pakistan will lose its nukes would be by depleting all of them on India.

 

[ForgetfulUsername]

NYT is one of the best sites for news , Idk why here users are saying a bad site .

Americans whinning as usual, Indians cheerleading them... as usual.

Hasn't the world (or just the US/Hindustan axis) learnt that Pakistan started its nuclear program all the way back 1974, no one was able to stop it back then and no one is going to stop it in the future come what may.

Only way Pakistan will lose its nukes would be by depleting all of them on India.

Or bleed Pakistan till it's no longer a country ,like the soviet

 

[Sky lord]

We're waiting... Let the Americans come.

Fasten your safety belts then.

Did you see this ?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/12/opinion/time-to-put-the-squeeze-on-pakistan.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

 

[I M Sikander]

Let the dogs in the street barks.
He would never be a nuclear power, if we had ever shown concern on these barkings.

Let them say what they want to say.

NYT is one of the best sites for news , Idk why here users are saying a bad site .



Or bleed Pakistan till it's no longer a country ,like the soviet

Hahaha . you are your dreams of bleeding Pakistan and collapse it.

By the way Russia, Yugoslavia and many others have collapsed in last 3 decades whereas we still stand against all odds.

We are very much aware of the fact how much NYT cares for the poor of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, n Korea, Iran Cuba, Libya, Syria and many others.

Let their concerns regarding our poors to themselves only.

 

[ForgetfulUsername]

Let the dogs in the street barks.
He would never be a nuclear power, if we had ever shown concern on these barkings.

Let them say what they want to say.
.

You guys aren't nuclear "power" , you are a country that makes a lot small tactical nukes out of insecurity. Since India massively overwhelms in conventional warfare & economy .

for **** sakes man , you have freaking 3 nuclear reactors . You are a lesser nuclear power than Hungary (that has 4 reactors) .nuclear WMD technology have been used since world war 2, there is literally nothing to gloat about mass manufacture it in 2016.

Hahaha . you are your dreams of bleeding Pakistan and collapse it.

By the way Russia, Yugoslavia and many others have collapsed in last 3 decades whereas we still stand against all odds.

We are very much aware of the fact how much NYT cares for the poor of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, n Korea, Iran Cuba, Libya, Syria and many others.

Let their concerns regarding our poors to themselves only
.

The fact that you assumed India will make pak bleed proves how insecure you are , I never said my country will bleed you.

If a super power like the soviets can be bleed to its death then so can Pakistan or any other country. Pakistan don't have the funds to sustain war or even mass proxy for a prolonged period .

NYT is hell a lot better news source than any Pakistani media I've been to .hell remember the massive media ban when nawaz visited USA last time , when he was heckled by balochistan protester during his speech. NYT may not be perfect , but it's one of the best around .the same agency has said controversial stuff on india , you don't see me judging them .

 

[Nefarious]

To all cheerleaders here talking about breaking and bleeding, There's only one guarantee here and that is if Pakistan ceases to exist, then so will you. Whether your an actual Superpower or a Supa Powa.

 

[ForgetfulUsername]

To all cheerleaders here talking about breaking and bleeding, There's only one guarantee here and that is if Pakistan ceases to exist, then so will you. Whether your an actual Superpower or a Supa Powa.

Pakistan's nukes aren't portable , they have limited range . If U.S. or co wanted they could do a full on invasion tomorrow & you won't be able to hit them . Even if you tried their nukes will reach you first long before your scrambled fighter jets reach the continent with warheads .


So yes ,Pakistan don't need to be bleed, it can be defeated by conventional warfare.