gogbot
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,201
- Reaction score
- 0
I gave you all the information , if you use your browsers search feature you can find all the info in my original post
You know how People always say India cant get anything of paper.
Well by that logic The Tejas only existed on Paper by 1991. that's when the design of the plane was finalised.
The project definition did not even happen until 1988 .
In 1983 all they had was the mission of making a 4th generation aircraft with what they had , it took them 7 years to get the point where they could actually even attempt it.
It will be in service next year.
Construction of the aircraft has already commenced.
It is finally happening get used to it
IAF still out numbers and our performs PAF .
you only have some 50 f-16's , maybe one squadron of JF-17.
that exists in all nations , singling out India proves nothing
You already have
commented and that is the reason for my posts.
21 years, i only consider development to have stated from 1988 when they had a project definition
Also the remainder just goes against common sense
Again happen's everywhere.
Can't be helped.
If you actually know anything about the MMRCA contract you will also know that outside the American planes. None of the other planes will even be ready for production until 2013.
SAAN Griphen NG and MIg-35 are still in development
EF and RAF still have yet to incorporate the upgrades.
As of now these aircraft don't meet the IAF requirements.
This delays is only a technicality in the contract wording.
Great are you an analyst with inside sources to confirm all this , or is it just common sense that tells you everything.
we have enough self proclaimed defence pundits
BY that logic the F-16 should be an ancient relic
By the time Pak get's the J-10 it will also be old.
But wait no, that is not the case why is that ?
it is because of continuous upgrades to technology while still in development, part of the delay was creeping requirements.
if you are so confident in your statement point out any obsolescence in the Tejas , and i will gladly respond.
The alst article i agev you was from a Russian source
Again you are making assumptions with out understand or reading the information properly.
This is a 50-50 venture meaning we have as much say in the project as they do. the Russians came to us we did not go to them.
They want us on the project they give us what we want, 25% development of the FGFA not the PAK FA is a very reasonable demand. ( if you actually bothered to read you would know the difference between the PAK-FA and FGFA)
And that is exactly what is being discussed on the negotiations table
true , you make a fair point.
But not every nation has the same resources and money.
India has been under and continues to be subject to the technology denial regimes . We had no picnic our selves.
every high technology venture we have undertaken has resulted in blocks by foreign nations , resulting in delays and development of indigenous alternatives.
DRDO and ISRO had to deliver on very tough order , with limited budgets and systemic bottlenecks
You know how People always say India cant get anything of paper.
Well by that logic The Tejas only existed on Paper by 1991. that's when the design of the plane was finalised.
The project definition did not even happen until 1988 .
In 1983 all they had was the mission of making a 4th generation aircraft with what they had , it took them 7 years to get the point where they could actually even attempt it.
It will be in service next year.
Construction of the aircraft has already commenced.
It is finally happening get used to it
IAF still out numbers and our performs PAF .
you only have some 50 f-16's , maybe one squadron of JF-17.
that exists in all nations , singling out India proves nothing
You already have
commented and that is the reason for my posts.
21 years, i only consider development to have stated from 1988 when they had a project definition
Also the remainder just goes against common sense
Again happen's everywhere.
Can't be helped.
If you actually know anything about the MMRCA contract you will also know that outside the American planes. None of the other planes will even be ready for production until 2013.
SAAN Griphen NG and MIg-35 are still in development
EF and RAF still have yet to incorporate the upgrades.
As of now these aircraft don't meet the IAF requirements.
This delays is only a technicality in the contract wording.
Great are you an analyst with inside sources to confirm all this , or is it just common sense that tells you everything.
we have enough self proclaimed defence pundits
BY that logic the F-16 should be an ancient relic
By the time Pak get's the J-10 it will also be old.
But wait no, that is not the case why is that ?
it is because of continuous upgrades to technology while still in development, part of the delay was creeping requirements.
if you are so confident in your statement point out any obsolescence in the Tejas , and i will gladly respond.
The alst article i agev you was from a Russian source
Again you are making assumptions with out understand or reading the information properly.
This is a 50-50 venture meaning we have as much say in the project as they do. the Russians came to us we did not go to them.
They want us on the project they give us what we want, 25% development of the FGFA not the PAK FA is a very reasonable demand. ( if you actually bothered to read you would know the difference between the PAK-FA and FGFA)
And that is exactly what is being discussed on the negotiations table
true , you make a fair point.
But not every nation has the same resources and money.
India has been under and continues to be subject to the technology denial regimes . We had no picnic our selves.
every high technology venture we have undertaken has resulted in blocks by foreign nations , resulting in delays and development of indigenous alternatives.
DRDO and ISRO had to deliver on very tough order , with limited budgets and systemic bottlenecks
). 
