What's new

Pak debate No body will side with Pakistan against india now

Pakistan is so unimportant that Indians are obsessed with Pakistan even more, they even watch our domestic news shows.:lol:
If they really did, then there would have been Pakistani news channels telecasting in India, basic demand and supply.
I'm surprised you made that opinion out of a random thread in a random forum. India is a little bigger than you think.

Oh look who started the thread lolz .. storm force thinks for and about Pakistan more then Pakistan it self :)
Considering the number of threads on Modi that get created everyday, some Pakistanis win hands down on that front.
 
Pakistan media is flooding with Half Baked Journos. They all think they are experts on issues after 6 months in the job. this concept of siding with Pakistan is 70s thing, not any more. Pakistan is going to be a major economic and military power in next 40 years, don't need anybody to side with US.
:Dhahahaha
 
to fox

THE ISLAMIC world is about ti implode.

Muslims are slaughtering each other

Muslims all over middle east are RUNNING to EUROPE for shelter ( many are drowning in dingys)

Pakistanis re being deported across Europe

Muslim womem are being taken off aitrline flights in the west daily

IN UK islmac women are racially abused on buses.

yet you want to get together and fight india
 
if we need foreign help against a country like india,than infact we don't even have the right to exist.
So very true.
Shiopa powah is not as powerful as they think
BtwBTW, the terror boat drama? Recently happened and it was India starting to manufacture excuse for naval blockade if Pakistan. But no country in the world even bothered listening to Indian lies.
So yes, still countries will stand with Pakistan
 
We aren't alone; the only countries however that will side or support Pakistan is China, Turkey, possibly Iran, and the Gulf nations. Even Indonesia supported us in 1965 and 1971 when they offered to invade Nicobar Islands as an attempt to divert Indian attention; which was stupid for us to decline, however our foreign relations with other countries have waned thanks to our incompetent foreign policies and those who enforce it.

Our average GDP growth rate has been 6-7% under Military rule and reached up to 11%.

Indonesia could not beat Malaysia in the early 1960s
Their ability to take Andaman & Nicobar islands is questionable
 
So every Country is saying Kashmir is Pakistan and India's affair, is that siding with India
20 years ago Pakistan was better economically so everyone was siding in Pakistan, now its India, who knows about 2040
 
Indonesia could not beat Malaysia in the early 1960s
Their ability to take Andaman & Nicobar islands is questionable

Not Malaysia that make us difficult, but because we also fight Britain, Australia, and New Zealand also

We dont lost the war, the war is ended because Soeharto take power (the war initiated by Soekarno).

Soeharto is pro Western and anti Communist. Even during his administration he sent special forces to help Malaysia curb their communist rebel in Borneo (Malaysia part)

Study this mate

Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The conflict lasted nearly four years; however, following General Suharto's replacement of Sukarno, Indonesian interest in pursuing the war with Malaysia declined, and combat eased. Peace negotiations were initiated during May 1966 before a final peace agreement was ratified on 11 August 1966.[87]

Although the Indonesians had conducted a few amphibious raids and an airborne operation against Malaya, the war remained limited throughout its duration and remained largely a land conflict. For either side to have escalated to large scale air or naval attacks "would have incurred disadvantages greatly outweighing the marginal military effect that they might have produced".[50] The UK Secretary of State for Defence at the time, Denis Healey, described the campaign as "one of the most efficient uses of military forces in the history of the world".[88] British Commonwealth forces peaked at 17,000 deployed in Borneo, with another 10,000 more available in Malaya and Singapore.[50]


The withdrawal parade in Labuan from the Royal Navy, Royal Australian Navy and Royal New Zealand Navy at the end of the confrontation after their successful mission.
Total British Commonwealth military casualties were 114 killed and 181 wounded, most of them Gurkhas.[50] The losses included Gurkha casualties of 43 killed and 83 wounded, other British armed forces were a further 19 killed and 44 wounded, Australian casualties of 16 killed and 9 wounded (although only 7 were killed in action) and New Zealand casualties of 7 killed and another 7 wounded or injured.[89][90] The remaining casualties were that of the Malaysian military, police, and Border Scouts. A significant number of British casualties occurred during helicopter accidents, including a Belvedere crash that killed several SAS commanders and a Foreign Office official, possibly a member of MI6. A Wessex collision also killed several men from 2nd Parachute Battalion, and a Westland Scout crash, on 16 July 1964, near Kluang airfield, killed the two crewmen from 656 Sqn AAC. Finally, in August 1966, there remained two British and two Australian soldiers missing and presumed dead, with the Australians (both from the SASR) probably drowned while crossing a swollen river.[91] The remains of a Royal Marine were recovered some 20 years later.[citation needed] Altogether, 36 cilivians were killed, 53 wounded and 4 captured, with most being local inhabitants.[50]

Indonesian casualties were estimated at 590 killed, 222 wounded and 771 captured.[50]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Indonesian during 1960 has the second largest military in Asia, just after China

Look even we also have destroyer (KRI Irian Jaya)

kri-irian.jpg
 
Last edited:
if we need foreign help against a country like india,than infact we don't even have the right to exist.

That is a serious statement?

Without clicking on the video , this must be a Geo news video

First of all , what does it means by no one would want to support Pakistan , are we so paralyzed that we can't defend our own borders?

Secondly , the recent work interest in India has more to do with Solider man power for anticipated world war three as foot soldiers , and has nothing to do with its "Technology" . In past world wars , people needed man power to dig trenches to move the equipment to man the post , to be front line "foot soldiers" so that is why there is interest in India due to large population base.

To counter China or Russia


One of the channels the government should certainly close is Geo and all private channels and only allow licence for 10-15 National TV channels, there is no need for Private channels owned by political parties and pressure groups

An excellent analysis.

First, someone else made that flamboyant statement, just a little while ago. I cannot understand how anyone who has studied the recent history of the region can make that statement, or this one. Both India and Pakistan have depended on external support; for either to claim that they will do it alone if need be is childish. Let us kid each other.

Second, your thoughts for the staffing of various functions during world war 3 make one aspect of military strategy, military operations and military tactics perfectly clear - If you don't wear a tuxedo (or Tuxedo, if you wish), you are missing out on life. There is nothing else, but this thought by itself is invaluable. This is a red-letter day for students of warfare.

Third, the advice on closing down TV channels is sound. Very sound. There should be a law on keeping down the sound of a talking head talking.

All Indian soldiers did ....dug up trenches for british army in world war 1 , man power hard labour

(By Indian soliders I mean a joint forces of India Sub continent may include Muslims at that time)


Present day .....man power is needed to man the post in deserts or other remote places so India is valued due to providing cheap labor force


Mainly to counter Big Chinese Army or Russian Army

War has its

a) Technology elements (Commuinication/radar/ weapons)
b) Machines
c) Man power


When two adversaries of similar technology go after one another , Man power comes in to play as well


Chinese and Russian forces have the ability to take over most of "Asia" as we know due to man power of their combined forces by Mere conventional tactics

Your knowledge of military history is profound and extensive. Consider yourself saluted by a vast multitude.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom