What's new

PAK COAS General Kiyani & U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry

CENTCOM

PROFESSIONAL
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
1,519
Reaction score
34
Country
United States
Location
United States
Here are some pictures taken when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistani Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Kayani for a trilateral meeting at the Truman Hall in Brussels, Belgium, on April 24, 2013.

8677647951_2d7eae517c.jpg

8677417205_7d73ea0c08.jpg

8678510940_31927ac8b9.jpg

8677591341_50e33eb77b.jpg

8678206414_557ea4e413.jpg

8677101483_3c386d84e2.jpg


Haroon Ahmad
DET - U.S. Central Command
www.facebook.com/centcomurdu
 
.
Its good seeing a meeting with the key foreign policy movers of these states.
 
. . .
so? wats wrong with that?

Foreign policy is best conducted by democratically elected civilian governments. It is never the military's job to conduct or interfere in foreign policy without proper constitutionally mandated oversight.

USA has a history of working directly with their selected partners that they can influence rather than those who are chosen by the people to conduct their affairs, and it usually ends in tears for all sides sooner or later.
 
.
Foreign policy is best conducted by democratically elected civilian governments. It is never the military's job to conduct or interfere in foreign policy without proper constitutionally mandated oversight.

USA has a history of working directly with their selected partners that they can influence rather than those who are chosen by the people to conduct their affairs, and it usually ends in tears for all sides sooner or later.
he went there with the consent of elected government of the ppl... i get ur point, but this man has done a lot to change the image of Pak army... in past 5 years, he got a dozen chances to overthrow the corrupt and incompetent government, and a number of players instigated him too to take over, but he didnt
 
.
Foreign policy is best conducted by democratically elected civilian governments. It is never the military's job to conduct or interfere in foreign policy without proper constitutionally mandated oversight.

USA has a history of working directly with their selected partners that they can influence rather than those who are chosen by the people to conduct their affairs, and it usually ends in tears for all sides sooner or later.

There is a delicoius irony to that. On the one hand; the USA is the world's strongest Democracy; but has not hesitated to get into bed with a motley crew of Despotic Dictators and Military Strongmen the world over and over so many decades.
The results of that strange consorting is there for the world to see and to feel! :azn:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom