Nishan_101
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,826
- Reaction score
- -18
Now we need to increase security on Eastern Borders Especially in SIACHIN, KASHMIR and in SINDH (due to oil,gas and coal reserves)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO the goal should be to just push. Push all the groups into Afghanistan and leave it up to the Americans to handle them.
IMO the goal should be to just push. Push all the groups into Afghanistan and leave it up to the Americans to handle them.
The goal should be to kill them, no matter which side of the border they happen to be.
The goal is to eliminate the threat and still keep our hands as clean as possible so that any backlash from the locals may be avoided.
Dead Taliban still may have relatives in those tribal areas.
better they focus their hate more on American as compared to the PA.
There is no pussyfooting around this threat for fear of backlash. The backlash is already there; just look at the losses in Pakistan over the last few years. There is no keeping "hands as clean as possible". The best way to eliminate the threat once and for all is to ensure a thorough cleanup.
Ah..but there is..
Its ok to pussyfoot as long as you can shift the blame on someone else's shoulders...namely the US of A.
Its excellent to Pussyfoot as long as you can shift the trouble to someone else's backyard..namely Amreeka.
Your sarcasm aside, USA has taken on those who attacked it on 9/11 head on, and largely killed off the leadership and rendered the rest incapable of mounting another attack. If that is pussyfooting, Pakistan is well-advised to do the same then.
Your sarcasm aside, USA has taken on those who attacked it on 9/11 head on, and largely killed off the leadership and rendered the rest incapable of mounting another attack. If that is pussyfooting, Pakistan is well-advised to do the same then.
............ why not let the cowboy with shiny spurs and the M-16 do the killing instead of the poor tattered and torn Pakistani guy with a .303 Enfield.
Shouldnt stopping terrorists entering Pakistan be Pakistan's responsibility ?
Indeed it's Pakistan's responsibility Just like it's India's responsibility to stop terrorists entering into India and it's Afgan+Nato's responsibility to stop terrorist entering into Afghanistan rather than blaming their failures on others.
It is not the cowboy with the M-16, but the nerdy guy munching on a cheeseburger controlling a drone over FATA that does the job over territory that should be cleaned up by the "tattered" PA soldier, while his general speeds around in S-class Mercedes.
The M-16 guy still sits in Afghanistan.. that is where the guy in the chauffeur driven S-class wants the problem to be.
He may want it, but will he get what he wants?
Such an approach will surely raise the odds of Pakistan being regarded as an adversary instead of an ally. The S-class guy should choose wisely.