Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
as far as i can see these are only advisors. A few guys here and there is not a big deal. people need to calm down.
Yes to drone strikes, no to drone strikes...So who are American policymakers supposed to listen to? The voice of the GoP leadership or that of the people? Or are they one and the same, merely psychotic in their efforts to avoid courage and responsibility for making difficult choices?
1. (S) Summary: The Pakistani Army has for just the second time approved deployment of U.S. special operation elements to support Pakistani military operations. The first deployment, with SOC(FWD)-PAK elements embedded with the Frontier Corps in XXXXXXXXXXXX, occurred in September (reftel). Previously, the Pakistani military leadership adamantly opposed letting us embed our special operations personnel with their military forces. The developments of the past two months thus appear to represent a sea change in their thinking. End Summary.
6. (S) Comment: U.S. special operation elements have been in Pakistan for more than a year, but were largely limited to a training role. The Pakistani Army leadership previously adamantly opposed letting us embed U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) with their military forces to support their operations. The recent approval by GHQ -- almost certainly with the personal consent of Chief of Army Staff General Kayani -- for SOC(FWD)-PAK deployments to XXXXXXXXXXXX appears to represent a sea change in Pakistani thinking. Patient relationship-building with the military is the key factor that has brought us to this point. The Pakistanis are increasingly confident that we do not have ulterior motives in assisting their operations. In addition, the direct recipients of SOC(FWD)-PAK training appear to have recognized the potential benefits of bringing U.S. SOF personnel into the field with them for operational advice and other support. In addition, the success of the initial deployment to XXXXXXXXXXXX likely helped catalyze the follow-up requests for new and repeat support.
7. (S) Comment Continued: These deployments are highly politically sensitive because of widely-held concerns among the public about Pakistani sovereignty and opposition to allowing foreign military forces to operate in any fashion on Pakistani soil. Should these developments and/or related matters receive any coverage in the Pakistani or U.S. media, the Pakistani military will likely stop making requests for such assistance. End Comment.
Source: US embassy cables: Pakistan approves secret US special forces deployment | World news | guardian.co.uk
Proof. This WikiLeaks saga has just confirmed everything we "paranoid conspiracy theorists" had thought previously. Our leaders, political and military, have made deals with the United States selling our principles for peanuts. "No foreign boots on Pakistani ground" Musharraf used to say. Well, maybe he meant the US soldiers will fight barefoot.
Proof. This WikiLeaks saga has just confirmed everything we "paranoid conspiracy theorists" had thought previously. Our leaders, political and military, have made deals with the United States selling our principles for peanuts. "No foreign boots on Pakistani ground" Musharraf used to say. Well, maybe he meant the US soldiers will fight barefoot.
I never implied otherwise,sir. As paranoid as I may be, I know better than to assume foreign soldiers would be running around here without Pak Army permission. This isn't Iraq.NOTE: The cable says the Pakistani army requested the assistance.
You've only muddied the waters, Clarifier!They will listen to who they want to listen to. And if there is nobody, they will listen to themselves.
Indeed, that could be the case. Thanks for that.The DAC in DAC-PAK is Disaster Assistance Center, these could be the US personel that came in for flood relief and for the earth quake relief in AJK , although we need to keep watch on them also.