US termed salala as friendly fire not an act of war two diffrent things! about salala all i can say is that check how rich mr. kiyani got in a day!
I see it differently.
US Army and Pakistan Army exchanged fire for 2 hours straight which resulted in destruction of two outposts and numerous casualties on our side.
Pakistan Army (the entire institution) was really angry and perceived the incident as an act of aggression. You can question the ethics of COAS Kiyani but he calculated his options and shut down the supply routes to Afghanistan until an apology was received.
and about neptune spear time will tell about this charade carried out!!
It was not a charade but another act of aggression from the US; see post no. 194 in page 13 and no. 218 in page 15 for details respectively.
There [is] a major asymmetry between the military capabilities of the US and Pakistan and this reality is openly acknowledged in the Abbottabad Commission Report.
when your government is sold out what can one expect! although not the same case right now!
Governments do not tend to be
sell outs in the manner you presume. They have to look at the bigger picture when making decisions.
Pakistan is plagued with a number of internal issues and unable to steer its economy out of crises, unfortunately.
yeah about afghanistan the whole world can see the miracle victory USA has pulled out! talibans grew stronger has strongholds on even more ground than before. USA only has stronghold on Kabul.
Afghanistan is in ruins! What else you want to see? US eradicating it from the face of the Earth?
Taliban is mostly good at harassing ANA and killing civilians. US Army has killed thousands of their combatants in various battles across Afghanistan since 2001. I am not sure what fights you have been watching.
What happened to the Taliban Spring Offensive by the way? They were about to take Kabul, weren't they?
and about US ravaging countries check out what kind of power those countries had! what can US do about North korea or even Iran! nothing! thats how mighty they are!!
They were reasonably strong but since US steamrolled them, a layperson gets the impression that they were easy pickings. I tell you that they were not.
Iraq, in particular, was extremely well-equipped and battle-hardened by 3rd World Standards in 1991.
Yes, I have seen what Iran can do; could not defeat Iraq in a span of 8 years. Also google "Operation Praying Mantis." Why do you think Iran compromised on its nuclear program in 2014? Because shit was about to hit the fan for them.
North Korea might be strong in regional context but no match for the US; Fat Kim knows this very well. This is why North Korea defines the trajectory of its missiles very carefully.
They have relevant technologies to counter them. Have you been living under the rock?
Evidence?
What exactly is vague
If a US drone violates our territory we will shoot it down...
Kindly illustrate the vague part... u can bold and underline it
We will see.