PAF New Batch J-10 C Spotted

[Windjammer]

Spotted 22-119.

 

[BON PLAN]

View attachment 855559

It is undoublty one of the most beautifull bird of the actual production.

 

[Beast]

It is undoublty one of the most beautifull bird of the actual production.

Are u sure? To me, the color scheme is just horrible but camouflage is not beauty contest. It has practical use...

 

[CodeforFood]

Su-30MKI wouldn't even be able to touch a JF-17 block 2 in reality.

JF-17 block 2 already has superior radar and missiles to MKI. Block 3 will see MKI from 50km further at least and engage at around 50km more if it is required. Superior jammers too. Much smaller RCS compared to the dinosaur MKI.

J-10C would eat not only MKI for breakfast lunch and dinner every day every minute, J-10C could eat Su-35S for breakfast lunch and dinner. Play around with Su-35 electronics like it is nothing. Electronics and software is 99% of battle now with fighters. Su-35 is already a laggard. Su-30MKI is from over 10 years before Su-35S.

View attachment 855742

View attachment 855743

View attachment 855744


For the moment, Su-30MKI has proven unable to even attack JF-17 and Mirage 2000. Proven. Su-30MKI went up in numbers against PAF and got Fcked sideways. Triple penetrated by JF-17, F-16, and Mirage 2000.

This looks badass. We should atleast grow the numbers to around 100 (round up/down to squadron )

 

[CodeforFood]

Rafale's SPECTRA is an integrated defensive system. J-10's defensive system is largely unknown. JF-17 should be able to get an integrated defensive system in Block III.

Are there any plans for having an integrated defense system on Blk 3?

 

[CodeforFood]

No rafale is still better than j10c especially in terms of EW

Rafale in a one on one comparison may be better, but you hardly ever have one on one scenarios. There would be tactics combos that would make the overall engagement possibly favorable for Pak Air Force. The difference even in one on one comparison isn't that decisive either.

 

[Windjammer]

 

[Princeps Senatus]

Are there any plans for having an integrated defense system on Blk 3?

It already has it

 

[syed_yusuf]

View attachment 897598

i like this pain job, all j10cp should have this

 

[MastanKhan]

Rafale in a one on one comparison may be better, but you hardly ever have one on one scenarios. There would be tactics combos that would make the overall engagement possibly favorable for Pak Air Force. The difference even in one on one comparison isn't that decisive either.

Hi,

What would make the Rafale better---?

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Are u sure? To me, the color scheme is just horrible but camouflage is not beauty contest. It has practical use...

I agree, its original color was far better. I cant tell how much this camouflage is practically useful for the intended use of that particular squadron. maybe keeping the legacy of A-5 and Mirage color scheme,

 

[BON PLAN]

Hi,

What would make the Rafale better---?

A better weapon system.
A far better elecronic support system.

As all the chinese wepons, the real status of J10 is absolutely not known.
As all the chinese weapons systems are direct or nearly direct derivatives of russian ones, and with the poor results of the russians systems in Ukraine, we could have a big doubt about their efficiency.

 

[Abramar]

A better weapon system.
A far better elecronic support system.

You know this how?

As all the chinese wepons, the real status of J10 is absolutely not known.
As all the chinese weapons systems are direct or nearly direct derivatives of russian ones, and with the poor results of the russians systems in Ukraine, we could have a big doubt about their efficiency.

This is so comically wrong, it confirms for me, that you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Princeps Senatus]

You know this how?

It was revealed to him in a dream.

 

[CodeforFood]

Hi,

What would make the Rafale better---?

I don't have authentic data to back any of this up. Based on established reliability of western systems is where I am deriving my understanding. I am not sure hence there was a little 'may be' in that sentence.