Tameem
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
- Messages
- 4,468
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Hi,
It was the PAF who decided against the procurement of an aircraft between the periods of 9/11 and earthquake of 2005. They misread the threat from india and assessed that india won't be a threat anymore---peace will be made---so it was a waste of buying something from another country on the RUN.
They analyzed that the JF 17 with french avionics and missile systems will make up for what pakistan needed. The french avionics package fiasco has set paf back by at least 15 years and still then they will have inferior weaponery and electronics package.
India was extremely wary of 1. pakistan getting close to the u s one more time 2. and pakistan's FINANCIAL conditions becoming fairly strong during that period.
Pakistanis must stop blaming Musharraf---he was just one man---there was a whole team to advise him what needed to be done---then there was the whole nation---who was mentally screwed up and did not know what its priorities were.
YOU PATHETIC PAKISTANIS---the terrorists killed FRENCH engineers in your largest city---why didn't you go all out for the blood of the terrorists----the terrorists killed and abducted chinese engineers---you didn't give a sh-it either.
That is why I keep saying----pakistanis have no character---they are just all talk and no substance---you brag about pak china friendship---you should have gone all out and taken out anyone and evryone who hurt the chinese---the french gave you the most potent agosta 90---yet you did not retaliate on the terrorists.
You are so pathetic that when these terrorists came and destroyed two of your major assets on the air force bases---you just has excuses---.
Kid---you paks really don't deserve a nation---you don't cherish what the basic fundamentals of a nationhood are.
Mastan, a slight professional dishonesty as a critic.
I 2nd you when you say we Pakistanis are pathetic when it comes to dealing with terrorists with iron hands but covering the arss of the single most responsible person in this regards just he happened to your personal favorite is beyond expectations. The moment we took this strategic decision right after 9/11 to hedge our policy with good Taliban and Bad Taliban and decides to never go all out against these non state actors with a single coherent policy is where when this person is the Chief Executive of our country with absolute powers. We never objects/stops or hurdles when in solidarity of those over the borders our own wild west went radical and for Jihad in droves to Afghanistan, that is the precise moment we could balance out but we fail miserably at that time. In preceding years we intentionally shows weakness in imposing the writ of the government in border areas just to cushion this strategic policy until its really get out of our hands really after Lal Masjid episode and we push to allow drone strikes unofficially.