Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CAS simply added more confusion with his statement.
No confusion at all ...
There must be another MiG-21 involved.
No confusion. The mig shot down is separate from alleged shooter of Mi-17.CAS simply added more confusion with his statement.
No confusion. The mig shot down is separate from alleged shooter of Mi-17.
Although it is likely a SPYDER that got the Mi-17.
Neutral Sources America confirmed no F-16 loss .So?
Our IAF chief also reiterated the F-16 kill yesterday.
All these reiterations from both sides have Zero value unless a neutral source supports their claims or their is evidence of a wreckage.
Also MI-17 was shot down by a SAM unit (and not Mig 21) because Mi-17 pilot forgot to switch on IFF system, so he is wrong on that count too.
Yes, there can be more than one mig-21 airborne and there can be multiple claims on what brought down an aircraft.The tweet says mi-17 was probably shot down by a mig-21
So you are saying there was only one MiG 21 in IAF fleet. I think you should update your information.Mi-17 shot down by mig-21 vs Indian SAM is a big confusion. Also undercuts PAF claim of no mig-21 weapon used.
Yes, there can be more than one mig-21 airborne and there can be multiple claims on what brought down an aircraft.
I disagree with the air chief and think it could have been a Spyder sam.
Lol .
Their Air chief confirmed ,so that is right ?
So what about the second half ?
Bodies ,fuselage anything ?
Radar screen shot or probably the photo of radar screen was already showed as proof by IAF .
But PAF is an official word .
Wrong:Like in last reply ,everything was ok until Pak military invited foreigners to visit Balakot after one and half month anf forcing IAF to release Radar picture this is the ego that we are telling .
So you are saying there was only one MiG 21 in IAF fleet. I think you should update your information.
Obviously we are do not know what hit that helicopter. Abhinandan had a wingman that ran back. It is clear he did not shoot anything. Though the Indian side has reported its sam targeting the helicopter.But I thought mig had all its weapons in tact?
Let's think a bit clearer. CAS was not saying Abhinandan's MiG-21 shot down the Mi-17.CAS simply added more confusion with his statement.
There is positive evidence that of the two SU-30, only one landed back at it's home base, the other either blew up or crash landed at Srinagar as it was close to that base.
Since PAF had established local superiority on 27 Feb. IAF was also trying to match us aircraft to aircraft. so whatever they had in the area they made it airborne. There were definitely several mig 21s airborne over kashmir region becoz Sirinagar airforce station is home to 51 Squadron of IAF which is equiped with mig 21 bisons (abhinandan was also from 51 squadron).My information is updated. Rather than speak in codes through a foreign journalist, PAF should update it’s own people with facts and figures so the truth is established.