What's new

P-8 Poseidon for KSA

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
AAG_zpseca393e8.jpg


It is equipped with the AN/APY-10 Naval surveillance Radar, AN/ALQ-213(V)1 EW management system, Mk 54 lightweight torpedo, Harpoon Block II anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM), SIGINT advanced sensors, 11 external hard points, AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER cruise missile with a range of 270 km, AGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missile with another version for anti-submarine warfare with a range of 124 km, Mark 54 torpedo calibre 324 mm, mines and dept bombs and many other weapon systems..


P-8A_Poseidon_of_VP-16_dropping_torpedo_in_2013.JPG


A U.S. Navy Boeing P-8A Poseidon (BuNo 168429) from Patrol Squadron VP-16 dropping an anti-submarine torpedo Mark 46


800px-Indian_Navy_P-8I_armed_with_Harpoon_Anti-Ship_missile.jpg


p-8-poseidon-drops-flares-101119n2232g023.jpeg


p8AGS.jpg


slam-er_2.jpg


boeing-mcdonnell-douglas-agmrgmugm-84-harpoon-anti-ship-missile-on-E5B3FX.jpg


img_1464.jpg



1.jpg


6115642467_8106c99b5a_b.jpg


p8-dircm.jpg


41ca6987e676d6f32b5d5853c4de7cb5.jpg


P-8A_MPA_Maritime_Patrol_Aircraft_Boeing_MMA_US_Navy_Sketch.jpg




The newest version is the P-8 AGS with AESA radar

6c83d877c10062616646b828f007643c
 
Last edited:
.
Great job, SC. :tup:

That is some impressive equipment! Leave it to the Americans to basically make a Boeing 737 into a deadly weapons system that can practically hunt down anything, including one of the most difficult threats to kill in submarines. Not often do you see a 'cruise missile' hanging off the wing of 'passenger' airplane. :lol:

Saudi military is tip-top.
 
.
Great job, SC. :tup:

That is some impressive equipment! Leave it to the Americans to basically make a Boeing 737 into a deadly weapons system that can practically hunt down anything, including one of the most difficult threats to kill in submarines. Not often do you see a 'cruise missile' hanging off the wing of 'passenger' airplane. :lol:

Saudi military is tip-top.
With this beast plus the modified anti submarine LCS (4 with option of another 4), RIP to enemy submarines..
Still I would like to see KSA's own attack submarines in the 1600 tons category, for intelligence gathering and as a deterrent to other navies, it is a strategic asset that will be more than potent in combination with the mentioned above systems..and I am not mentioning the other existing Saudi Ships or the ones to be procured from Spain, Turkey and France, some even from Russia apparently, since there are some Saudi Cadets getting training in St-Petersburg..there are also JV's with South Korea for both civilian and military ship building in KSA.. KSA is coming big time..
 
.
With this beast plus the modified anti submarine LCS (4 with option of another 4), RIP to enemy submarines..
Still I would like to see KSA's own attack submarines in the 1600 tons category, for intelligence gathering and as a deterrent to other navies, it is a strategic asset that will be more than potent in combination with the mentioned above systems..and I am not mentioning the other existing Saudi Ships or the ones to be procured from Spain, Turkey and France, some even from Russia apparently, since there are some Saudi Cadets getting training in St-Petersburg..there are also JV's with South Korea for both civilian and military ship building in KSA.. KSA is coming big time..

Sir, a question. If their navy is so potent, why can't they enforce an embargo on the Houthis to stop ammunition etc. from Iran? Whey did they need an American warship manning the seas off Houthi held territory?

All these expensive toys are worthless if they can't operationalize them properly.
 
.
Sir, a question. If their navy is so potent, why can't they enforce an embargo on the Houthis to stop ammunition etc. from Iran? Whey did they need an American warship manning the seas off Houthi held territory?

All these expensive toys are worthless if they can't operationalize them properly.
You should read about Bab-el-Mandeb strait, it is a very important commercial maritime strait:

The importance and a description of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was summarized in a report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration in November. It said in part:

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle East, and it is a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. The strait is located between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea, and connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Most exports from the Persian Gulf that transit the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline also pass through Bab el-Mandeb.

An estimated 3.8 million bbl/d of crude oil and refined petroleum products flowed through this waterway in 2013 toward Europe, the United States, and Asia, an increase from 2.9 million bbl/d in 2009. Oil shipped through the strait decreased by almost one-third in 2009 because of the global economic downturn and the decline in northbound oil shipments to Europe. Northbound oil shipments increased through Bab el-Mandeb Strait in 2013, and more than half of the traffic, about 2.1 million bbl/d, moved northbound to the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is 18 miles wide at its narrowest point, limiting tanker traffic to two 2-mile-wide channels for inbound and outbound shipments. Closure of the Bab el-Mandeb could keep tankers from the Persian Gulf from reaching the Suez Canal or SUMED Pipeline, diverting them around the southern tip of Africa, adding to transit time and cost. In addition, European and North African southbound oil flows could no longer take the most direct route to Asian markets via the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb.

red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-space-200x300.jpg


The threat was highlighted this month in a comprehensive analysis of the Yemen situation in a report by CSIS Arleigh Burke Chair in Strategy Anthony Cordesman. Writing in “The Changing Security Balance in the Gulf,” he noted:

[T]he growing ties between Yemen’s Houthi Shi’ites and Iran poses another threat to both Saudi Arabia and the US. It potentially could allow Iran to outflank the Gulf, and deploy air and naval forces into Yemen. This threat still seems limited, but it is important to note that Yemen’s territory and islands play a critical role in the security of another global chokepoint at the southeastern end of the Red Sea called the Bab el Mandab or “gate of tears.”

A threat to Bab el-Mandeb traffic could ultimately take many forms such as deployment of sea mines, harassment and interdiction by small patrol craft, and attacks by air based and land based weapon systems. The 1980’s Iran-Iraq War provided ample evidence of the disruptions to international commerce and freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf by these methods, especially around the Hormuz Strait approaches during the so-called “Tanker War.” Selected merchant ships were routinely harassed and attacked by Iranian regular and Revolutionary Guard air and seaborne units. Persistent mining attempts were made against commercial and military vessels which led to several spasms of combat between American and Iranian forces. The Strait of Hormuz remains a potential venue for conflict as illustrated in 2012 when Tehran threatened to close the chokepoint if nuclear program inspired sanctions against it were not lifted. In 2008 the Commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps said, “Closing the Strait of Hormuz for an unlimited period of time would be very easy.” As the CSIS report said, “Such a threat also can be largely covert or indirect. Libya demonstrated this under Qaddafi when he had a cargo ship drop mines in the Red Sea.” In 1984 at least 19 vessels transiting the Red Sea were damaged by sea mine strikes in the vicinity of the Gulf of Suez.

DSC_0113-1024x680.jpg


A threat to Bab el-Mandeb traffic would inhibit commercial shipping through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, including the approximately 3.3 million barrels a day of oil cargoes from the Gulf bound for Western ports. A thorough 2011 CNA study on the “Economic Implications of Disruptions to Maritime Oil Chokepoints” pointed out that:

Oil exports that pass through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait are predominantly northbound. This oil could be transported through the East-West Pipeline to bypass the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. However, the pipeline would not have sufficient capacity to transport all of the oil regularly transited through the strait. The remaining 0.8 million bbd —24 percent of the total oil shipments through the strait—would need to be detoured around the Cape of Good Hope.

Much of disrupted oil cargo could be diverted by pipeline across Saudi Arabia to Red Sea ports for onward shipment to the Mediterranean or transited around Africa via the Cape of Good Hope — with an additional, costly seven to ten days travel time added to the voyage. However, trouble at the Bab el-Mandeb Strait would affect more than oil shipments. Other commercial shipments — containers, bulk carriers and such — would be interrupted and would have to travel overland across Saudi Arabia or around Africa for Gulf shipments. Europe to Asia cargo would be consigned to the Cape of Good Hope long route.

africa.jpg


As the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt and her escorts navigate southbound in the Red Sea and pass Perim Island in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, her crew will undoubtedly be mindful that the security of that narrow waterway may become an important part of their mission of stability and freedom of navigation in the region.

http://susris.com/2015/04/14/the-bab-el-mandeb-maritime-chokepoint/
 
.
You should read about Bab-el-Mandeb strait, it is a very important commercial maritime strait:

The importance and a description of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was summarized in a report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration in November. It said in part:

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle East, and it is a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. The strait is located between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea, and connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Most exports from the Persian Gulf that transit the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline also pass through Bab el-Mandeb.

An estimated 3.8 million bbl/d of crude oil and refined petroleum products flowed through this waterway in 2013 toward Europe, the United States, and Asia, an increase from 2.9 million bbl/d in 2009. Oil shipped through the strait decreased by almost one-third in 2009 because of the global economic downturn and the decline in northbound oil shipments to Europe. Northbound oil shipments increased through Bab el-Mandeb Strait in 2013, and more than half of the traffic, about 2.1 million bbl/d, moved northbound to the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is 18 miles wide at its narrowest point, limiting tanker traffic to two 2-mile-wide channels for inbound and outbound shipments. Closure of the Bab el-Mandeb could keep tankers from the Persian Gulf from reaching the Suez Canal or SUMED Pipeline, diverting them around the southern tip of Africa, adding to transit time and cost. In addition, European and North African southbound oil flows could no longer take the most direct route to Asian markets via the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb.

red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-space-200x300.jpg


The threat was highlighted this month in a comprehensive analysis of the Yemen situation in a report by CSIS Arleigh Burke Chair in Strategy Anthony Cordesman. Writing in “The Changing Security Balance in the Gulf,” he noted:

[T]he growing ties between Yemen’s Houthi Shi’ites and Iran poses another threat to both Saudi Arabia and the US. It potentially could allow Iran to outflank the Gulf, and deploy air and naval forces into Yemen. This threat still seems limited, but it is important to note that Yemen’s territory and islands play a critical role in the security of another global chokepoint at the southeastern end of the Red Sea called the Bab el Mandab or “gate of tears.”

A threat to Bab el-Mandeb traffic could ultimately take many forms such as deployment of sea mines, harassment and interdiction by small patrol craft, and attacks by air based and land based weapon systems. The 1980’s Iran-Iraq War provided ample evidence of the disruptions to international commerce and freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf by these methods, especially around the Hormuz Strait approaches during the so-called “Tanker War.” Selected merchant ships were routinely harassed and attacked by Iranian regular and Revolutionary Guard air and seaborne units. Persistent mining attempts were made against commercial and military vessels which led to several spasms of combat between American and Iranian forces. The Strait of Hormuz remains a potential venue for conflict as illustrated in 2012 when Tehran threatened to close the chokepoint if nuclear program inspired sanctions against it were not lifted. In 2008 the Commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps said, “Closing the Strait of Hormuz for an unlimited period of time would be very easy.” As the CSIS report said, “Such a threat also can be largely covert or indirect. Libya demonstrated this under Qaddafi when he had a cargo ship drop mines in the Red Sea.” In 1984 at least 19 vessels transiting the Red Sea were damaged by sea mine strikes in the vicinity of the Gulf of Suez.

DSC_0113-1024x680.jpg


A threat to Bab el-Mandeb traffic would inhibit commercial shipping through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, including the approximately 3.3 million barrels a day of oil cargoes from the Gulf bound for Western ports. A thorough 2011 CNA study on the “Economic Implications of Disruptions to Maritime Oil Chokepoints” pointed out that:

Oil exports that pass through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait are predominantly northbound. This oil could be transported through the East-West Pipeline to bypass the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. However, the pipeline would not have sufficient capacity to transport all of the oil regularly transited through the strait. The remaining 0.8 million bbd —24 percent of the total oil shipments through the strait—would need to be detoured around the Cape of Good Hope.

Much of disrupted oil cargo could be diverted by pipeline across Saudi Arabia to Red Sea ports for onward shipment to the Mediterranean or transited around Africa via the Cape of Good Hope — with an additional, costly seven to ten days travel time added to the voyage. However, trouble at the Bab el-Mandeb Strait would affect more than oil shipments. Other commercial shipments — containers, bulk carriers and such — would be interrupted and would have to travel overland across Saudi Arabia or around Africa for Gulf shipments. Europe to Asia cargo would be consigned to the Cape of Good Hope long route.

africa.jpg


As the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt and her escorts navigate southbound in the Red Sea and pass Perim Island in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, her crew will undoubtedly be mindful that the security of that narrow waterway may become an important part of their mission of stability and freedom of navigation in the region.

http://susris.com/2015/04/14/the-bab-el-mandeb-maritime-chokepoint/

So, basically, even after all that money spent, they still need American help just to protect freedom of movement, and the cannot impose an embargo on basically rabble rousers in Yemen...
 
.
So, basically, even after all that money spent, they still need American help just to protect freedom of movement, and the cannot impose an embargo on basically rabble rousers in Yemen...
No, it is not that..it is rather simple to understand.. no one can control the Bab-el-Mandeb, not even the US without disrupting world commerce.. the only thing one can do is to protect the commercial shipping through it..and with thousands of ships going through it, it is obvious that some ships might covertly carry weapons and ammunition to the Houthis and will slip through "surveillance"..
 
.
No, it is not that..it is rather simple to understand.. no one can control the Bab-el-Mandeb, not even the US without disrupting world commerce.. the only thing one can do is to protect the commercial shipping through it..and with thousands of ships going through it, it is obvious that some ships might covertly carry weapons and ammunition to the Houthis and will slip through "surveillance"..

Sir, if after spending all those billions they cannot ensure that no ships move towards houthi areas then it is a major fail. Controlling large open seas for very small ships is not a new problem. In Australia, we have a huge coastline and tiny ships trying to smuggle illegal immigrants. Once Tony Abbott's government decided to enforce the policy of no boat arrivals, the Navy achieved the objective.

The thing is, when you are dependent on others to tell you the limits of technology, you cannot object if they tell you something cannot be done. Everything is possible, you just need the scientific know how.
 
.
Sir, if after spending all those billions they cannot ensure that no ships move towards houthi areas then it is a major fail. Controlling large open seas for very small ships is not a new problem. In Australia, we have a huge coastline and tiny ships trying to smuggle illegal immigrants. Once Tony Abbott's government decided to enforce the policy of no boat arrivals, the Navy achieved the objective.

The thing is, when you are dependent on others to tell you the limits of technology, you cannot object if they tell you something cannot be done. Everything is possible, you just need the scientific know how.
These are no tiny ships, you can hide weapons in Tankers and big commercial ships, and you have to control thousands of them, unlike Australia the region is not an Island where you can have watch post all around it and spot anything coming towards you..And there are no known Houthi zones.. International aid comes from all over the world through big ships and once it is in a Yemeni port, Houthis through their allies will get anything shipped amongst the aid, they also trade in the international aid to finance themselves,, So it is a rather difficult situation..
 
.
These are no tiny ships, you can hide weapons in Tankers and big commercial ships, and you have to control thousands of them, unlike Australia the region is not an Island where you can have watch post all around it and spot anything coming towards you..

Well, I am not a naval expert, but I'd think placing an embargo on limited waters should be easier than defending a whole continent's shoreline from tiny boats. If I take an analogy from aviation, a given RADAR system has an upper limit of how many aircraft it can track, but if you are reaching that upper limit you throw more RADARs at it. With billions spent on air and sea assets, there should be no reason for not being able to achieve this. But, then again, somehow, they need protection from submarines at a higher priority. Oh well...
 
.
@CriticalThought

Your posts make little sense with all due respect. Firstly Yemen has the third largest percentage of guns per capita in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

Secondly US assistance (which do not arrive out of the sake of love but for the sake of trying to restore order in a absolutely key strategic strait such as the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait = guarding their own interests) is negligible. Most of the work is done by KSA and the Arab coalition. Thirdly, we are talking about very few instances of weapons smuggling and when they occurred they occurred using small fishing boasts. It's almost impossible to control several 1000 km long coastlines (Yemeni coastline) 24/7 if most of the smuggling is done using small fishing boats. Especially not when you have an entire continent (Africa) next door and the Horn of Africa which is a smugglers paradise. Then you have the wider Arabian Sea.

Using your logic the Americans were incompetent whenever the Iraqi resistance armed themselves through smuggling and similarly with the Taliban and nowadays ISIS.

Lastly Saleh/Houthis control some of the Western Red Sea coastline of Yemen which adds to the existing difficulty.

Let's keep this thread serious for once.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
@CriticalThought

Your posts make little sense with all due respect. Firstly Yemen has the third largest percentage of guns per capita in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

Secondly US assistance (which do not out of the sake of love but for the sake of trying to restore order in a absolute key strategic strait such as the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait = guarding their own interests) is negligible. Most of the work is done by KSA and the Arab coalition. Thirdly, we are talking about very few instances of weapons smuggling and when they occurred they occurred using small fishing boasts. It's almost impossible to control several 1000 km long coastlines (Yemeni coastline) 24/7 if most of the smuggling is done using small fishing boats. Especially not when you have an entire continent (Africa) next door and the Horn of Africa which is a smugglers paradise. Then you have the wider Arabian Sea.

Using your logic the Americans were incompetent whenever the Iraqi resistance armed themselves through smuggling and similarly with the Taliban and nowadays ISIS.

Lastly Saleh/Houthis control some of the Western Red Sea coastline of Yemen which adds to the existing difficulty.

Let's keep this thread serious for once.

Sir, first of all, I am completely serious. Second, it looks like American assets are permanently stationed in the region, so they are definitely providing assistance:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/world/middleeast/yemen-rebels-missile-warship.html?_r=0

And last of all, with the kind of money that Saudi Arabia can muster, nothing should be impossible.

By the way, the love of Hijaz and the Khadim-ul-Haramin Al-Shareefain runs in my blood. What I am trying to say is that I am not seeing the full results of the money being spent.
 
.
Sir, first of all, I am completely serious. Second, it looks like American assets are permanently stationed in the region, so they are definitely providing assistance:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/world/middleeast/yemen-rebels-missile-warship.html?_r=0

And last of all, with the kind of money that Saudi Arabia can muster, nothing should be impossible.

By the way, the love of Hijaz and the Khadim-ul-Haramin Al-Shareefain runs in my blood. What I am trying to say is that I am not seeing the full results of the money being spent.

I wrote that they provided assistance but that it was negligible compared to what KSA and the Arab coalition offers who are after all the ones who are doing all the fighting in Yemen.

It's not about money. The US is much richer than KSA yet they cannot stop millions of illegals crossing into the US or stop Taliban from smuggling heroin and arms into and out of Afghanistan and that's a landlocked country unlike Yemen which has a large coastline (Red Sea and Arabian Sea).

I know how smuggling works in Yemen as I know that country and I have visited it many times. In the Saleh/Houthi controlled coastal regions of the Yemeni Western Red Sea coastline local fishermen (due to being desperate to earn money) and other smugglers are willing to help Saleh/Houthis smuggle weapons in and out of Yemen by using mostly small fishing boats during the night. Opportunists among the Houthis/Saleh even smuggle weapon on behalf of the Yemeni army/KSA/Arab coalition and similarly with AQAP. It's all about money and survival for many such people in desperate times like wars.

KSA/Arab coaliton has destroyed many of such fishing boats during the night and day and there are tons of videos on Youtube that show this. However it is impossible to prevent ALL smuggling in this case.

I understand this and I respect your affinity and hopefully you are able to separate regimes from the people but KSA (House of Saud) gets a lot of ridiculous criticism that other Muslim regimes and nations do not do although they do worse or similarly. Quite frankly, and I am saying this without trying to sound arrogant, but most users here on PDF have very little knowledge about Yemen and the current Yemeni civil war and Yemeni history. It's easier for such individuals to scream "incompetence" while they do not understand that it's anything but incompetence. The performance of KSA/Arab coalition so far in Yemen that is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
I wrote that they provided assistance but that it was negligible compared to what KSA and the Arab coalition offers who are after all the ones who are doing all the fighting in Yemen.

It's not about money. The US is much richer than KSA yet they cannot stop millions of illegals crossing into the US or stop Taliban from smuggling heroin and arms into and out of Afghanistan and that's a landlocked country unlike Yemen which has a large coastline (Red Sea and Arabian Sea).

I know how smuggling works in Yemen as I know that country and I have visited it many times. In the Saleh/Houthi controlled coastal regions of the Yemeni Western Red Sea coastline local fishermen (due to being desperate to earn money) and other smugglers are willing to help Saleh/Houthis smuggle weapons in and out of Yemen by using mostly small fishing boats during the night. Opportunists even smuggle weapon on behalf of the Yemeni army/KSA/Arab coalition and similarly with AQAP. It's all about money and survival for many such people in desperate times like wars.

KSA/Arab coaliton has destroyed many of such fishing boats during the night and day and there are tons of videos on Youtube that show this. However it is impossible to prevent ALL smuggling in this case.

I understand this and I respect your affinity and hopefully you are able to separate regimes from the people but KSA (House of Saud) gets a lot of ridiculous criticism that other Muslim regimes and nations do not do although they do worse or similarly. Quite frankly, and I am saying this without trying to sound arrogant, but most users here on PDF have very little knowledge about Yemen and the current Yemeni civil war and Yemeni history. It's easier for such individuals to scream "incompetence" while they do not understand that it's anything but incompetence. The performance of KSA/Arab coalition so far in Yemen that is.

Sir technology has progressed to a point where tiny details can be monitored. The following article talks about seeing individual raindrops.

http://www.networkworld.com/article...-can-see-individual-raindrops-in-a-storm.html

With the amount of money that Saudi can muster, we should be able to achieve absolutely 0 transgression from the Houthis/Iranians.

If you don't mind, I'd like to tag experts such as @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Penguin @Rashid Mahmood whose knowledge about naval systems is much more indepth.

The point being, yes, it is nice to have the Poseidon P-8, but given the immediate threats being faced, what would be systems in which investment could be made and how many of these would be required? The aim being to bring down smuggling to 0% by using small fishing boats.

And finally, I say this from a bleeding heart, if Muslim countries were themselves technologically advanced and producing weapons from scratch, we wouldn't need to be limited to what is provided by others. Food for thought.
 
.
Sir technology has progressed to a point where tiny details can be monitored. The following article talks about seeing individual raindrops.

http://www.networkworld.com/article...-can-see-individual-raindrops-in-a-storm.html

With the amount of money that Saudi can muster, we should be able to achieve absolutely 0 transgression from the Houthis/Iranians.

If you don't mind, I'd like to tag experts such as @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Penguin @Rashid Mahmood whose knowledge about naval systems is much more indepth.

The point being, yes, it is nice to have the Poseidon P-8, but given the immediate threats being faced, what would be systems in which investment could be made and how many of these would be required? The aim being to bring down smuggling to 0% by using small fishing boats.

And finally, I say this from a bleeding heart, if Muslim countries were themselves technologically advanced and producing weapons from scratch, we wouldn't need to be limited to what is provided by others. Food for thought.
Brother, How can you stop fishing boats when they are the bread and butter of millions of Yemenis, you should look at it in a humanitarian and brotherly context.. Yemenis are Arabs and Muslims not ginea pigs to test systems on them.. the Issue of war in Yemen is the coup attempt by Saleh and the Houthi Militia that count for 1 million or so individuals and Yemen has ~27 million population.. Hope you understand the Saudi and other Arabs position as far as the Yemeni conflict is concerned..

As for the P-8, do you really believe it is for Yemen, or are you joking?
If you are a true Muslim, eve if you hear that KSA is spending $1 trillion to protect Al Haramein And their sacred land, you should feel very happy..

=======================================================
P-8 Poseidon

P8A_Poseidon-3d.jpg


Type: Navy patrol aircraft

Year of manufacture: 2009
Entry to service: 2013
Users: United States - India - Saudi Arabia - Australia
Manufacturer: Boeing
Range: 8300 km
Flight altitude: 41,000 feet
Maximum weight load: 85 thousand kg
Speed: 907km per hour
Quality of load:
AGM-84H / K SLAM-ER, AGM-84 Harpoon, Mark 54 torpedo, missiles, mines, torpedoes
 
.
Back
Top Bottom