So by your own admission Pakistani asylum seekers outnumber Indian ones by 34 times.
Nice attempt at obfuscation. In post #22 you claimed that "Indians are nowwere [sic] to be seen". The data from Italy's Superior Council of the Judiciary shows otherwise. Exposing your lie does not equate to an "admission" on my part, regardless of the relative volume of applicants from Pakistan
vis-à-vis India.
Anyways even UN confirms that in the entire world Pakistani asylum seekers outnumber Indian more than 2 times even thoughPakistanpopulation is 1/6th of India.
Evidence for that "more than 2 times" claim? And how much is "more" exactly?
You talk about the "entire world". Here are some verifiable facts:
- The UNHCR report at
this link is inconclusive as it does not attempt to list asylum applicants from all countries. In addition, most of its reported data concentrates only on the top 10 refugee source and destination countries (see Chapter 2, pages 13 onwards).
- The OECD's
International Migration Outlook 2017 report is equally inconclusive, as its Statistical Annex ("Inflows of Asylum Seekers", see pages 277 onwards) is not only restricted to the 35 OECD member states, but also has entries for "All other countries" after the top 15 source countries, which essentially smudges the purity of the dataset. Nevertheless, in at lease five of these countries (Finland, Japan, Latvia, New Zealand, US), Indians clearly outnumbered Pakistanis in asylum claims in 2016.
IF these datasets were complete, it would be a relatively simple matter to compare them either approximately (using the mean, standard deviation, skewness and outliers) or more rigorously (t-test, F-test, regression analysis, even time-series analysis if one were to analyze annual variations) to get a clearer picture.
In the absence of such data and its analysis, your claim of "more than 2 times" in "the entire world" amounts to nothing more than just another Indian lie on PDF.
