Outcome of Indo-Pak warfare – CIA reveals that India suffered more casualties and losses.

[MZ-PDF]

1. Casualties: Killed, Captured, Missing, Wounded in Action.

Pakistan: 3000-5000 out of 189,000 strength.
India: 4000-6000 out of 942,000 strength.

2. Armor Losses:

Pakistan: 250 Tanks out of 900
India: 300 Out of 1500

3. Aircraft Losses:

Pakistan: Lost fewer aircrafts. [PAF lost 19 aircrafts]
India: Lost more aircraft than Pakistan. [IAF lost more than 75 aircrafts]

Report concludes that Pakistan outperformed Indian Air Force.


4. Territorial Gains:

Pakistan: 210^2km of Indian territory, mostly strategically important, including key Military areas.

India: 320^2km of Pakistani non strategic territory, as its blitzkrieg in Sialkot and Lahore failed.


Conclusion:

India had an "inconsequential" advantage due to the size of its military. Pakistan succeeded in bringing International intervention on Kashmir issue.

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79T00472A000600020013-0.pdf

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

1. Casualties: Killed, Captured, Missing, Wounded in Action.

Pakistan: 3000-5000 out of 189,000 strength.
India: 4000-6000 out of 942,000 strength.

2. Armor Losses:

Pakistan: 250 Tanks out of 900
India: 300 Out of 1500

3. Aircraft Losses:

Pakistan: Lost fewer aircrafts. [PAF lost 19 aircrafts]
India: Lost more aircraft than Pakistan. [IAF lost more than 75 aircrafts]

Report concludes that Pakistan outperformed Indian Air Force.


4. Territorial Gains:

Pakistan: 210^2km of Indian territory, mostly strategically important, including key Military areas.

India: 320^2km of Pakistani non strategic territory, as its blitzkrieg in Sialkot and Lahore failed.


Conclusion:

India had an "inconsequential" advantage due to the size of its military. Pakistan succeeded in bringing International intervention on Kashmir issue.

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79T00472A000600020013-0.pdf

Great share, thanks.

@PAKISTANFOREVER @Musings @Verve @masterchief_mirza @Morpheus @PakFactor @Dalit @PanzerKiel @Clutch @crankthatskunk @313ghazi @PakSword @waz @21st Century Vampire @Figaro @beijingwalker @vi-va

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

1. Casualties: Killed, Captured, Missing, Wounded in Action.

Pakistan: 3000-5000 out of 189,000 strength.
India: 4000-6000 out of 942,000 strength.

2. Armor Losses:

Pakistan: 250 Tanks out of 900
India: 300 Out of 1500

3. Aircraft Losses:

Pakistan: Lost fewer aircrafts. [PAF lost 19 aircrafts]
India: Lost more aircraft than Pakistan. [IAF lost more than 75 aircrafts]

Report concludes that Pakistan outperformed Indian Air Force.


4. Territorial Gains:

Pakistan: 210^2km of Indian territory, mostly strategically important, including key Military areas.

India: 320^2km of Pakistani non strategic territory, as its blitzkrieg in Sialkot and Lahore failed.


Conclusion:

India had an "inconsequential" advantage due to the size of its military. Pakistan succeeded in bringing International intervention on Kashmir issue.

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79T00472A000600020013-0.pdf

So based on a credible, irrefutable and reliable source, Pakistan inflicted more damage and losses on an enemy that is more than 7× bigger than us and has the full backing of Russia and the West............

 

[swnjo]

 

[Tejas Spokesman]

Lol.
Destroyed.

 

[crankthatskunk]

One Indian had the guts to comment "Destroyed".

If you kill more of enemy soldiers, around 2000 more than your own, despite having 753,000 less soldiers to fight.

In those days that figure of excesses Indian force alone was close to 1:4 and in total strength of 1:5 of the Indian army.
The result should have been complete destruction of Pakistani army.
Imagine if Pakistan had 942,000 and Indians have 189,000 strength of their army!!
Pakistanis would have obliterated Indian army, with the strength of their numbers and armour.

Same for armour:

900 Pakistani tanks destroyed 300 Indian tanks. that a percentage of 33.34% of their force strength.
1500 Indian tanks destroyed 250 Pakistani tanks that a percentage of 16.67% of their force strength.

Aircraft Losses:

Pakistan's losses were only 25% of Indian losses. Despite Indians having strength in numbers.
Once again if Pakistan had numbers advantage, it would have obliterated Indian Air Force completely.
In any event killing 75 birds compared to your 19 losses is remarkable result.

If we consider other geopolitical situations and arms supplies. It is clear Indians suffered a crushing defeat.

But stupid Indians still shout that they win the war.
IF we analyse any war between India and Pakistan the result is the same.
But funnily Indian win all the wars.
At least in their heads.

 

[Jackdaws]

Lol. The first line states - "India won the war". But who cares, eh?

 

[arjunk]

Indians when an atlas of the 1971 war by the USA states Pakistan made gains in Punjab and Kashmir while India gained barren hills and sand: I sleep
Indians when this document says India won in some aspects of the 1965 war: Real shit

 

[Jackdaws]

Indians when an atlas of the 1971 war by the USA states Pakistan made gains in Punjab and Kashmir while India gained barren hills and sand: I sleep
Indians when this document says India won in some aspects of the 1965 war: Real shit

I'd like to see this Atlas.

 

[Crixus]

When the geography of a nation changes then who cares about minimal gains or losses ..... I am sure even your fellow Pakistanis will not agree with your below statement

Indians when an atlas of the 1971 war by the USA states Pakistan made gains in Punjab and Kashmir while India gained barren hills and sand: I sleep
Indians when this document says India won in some aspects of the 1965 war: Real shit

 

[rishav]

One Indian had the guts to comment "Destroyed".

If you kill more of enemy soldiers, around 2000 more than your own, despite having 753,000 less soldiers to fight.

In those days that figure of excesses Indian force alone was close to 1:4 and in total strength of 1:5 of the Indian army.
The result should have been complete destruction of Pakistani army.
Imagine if Pakistan had 942,000 and Indians have 189,000 strength of their army!!
Pakistanis would have obliterated Indian army, with the strength of their numbers and armour.

Same for armour:

900 Pakistani tanks destroyed 300 Indian tanks. that a percentage of 33.34% of their force strength.
1500 Indian tanks destroyed 250 Pakistani tanks that a percentage of 16.67% of their force strength.

Aircraft Losses:

Pakistan's losses were only 25% of Indian losses. Despite Indians having strength in numbers.
Once again if Pakistan had numbers advantage, it would have obliterated Indian Air Force completely.
In any event killing 75 birds compared to your 19 losses is remarkable result.

If we consider other geopolitical situations and arms supplies. It is clear Indians suffered a crushing defeat.

But stupid Indians still shout that they win the war.
IF we analyse any war between India and Pakistan the result is the same.
But funnily Indian win all the wars.
At least in their heads.

Two things ,

1)India did not deploy all its soldiers and weapons/tanks all at once .
So those ratios and percentages doesn't really mean anything .

2)Stating that IF pakistan had the numerical advantage and what not is just wishful thinking .
It takes effort to keep a huge country like India or any huge country for that matter together . It is very hard . I think pakistan knows this very well . So that itself is an achievement for India and it is going to reap its benefits just like it bears its disadvantages

 

[batmannow]

How KGB, CIA , RAW all made Dhaka fall posible and why?
So don't tell us fake stories it was a operation coordinated, by RUSSIA, INDIA, AND DAM AMERICA all had thier own interses and the truth can be seen of the murder of shkeh mujeeb

 

[Metal 0-1]

There is no doubt that Pakistanis have best K/D ratio..

 

[crankthatskunk]

Two things ,

1)India did not deploy all its soldiers and weapons/tanks all at once .
So those ratios and percentages doesn't really mean anything .

2)Stating that IF pakistan had the numerical advantage and what not is just wishful thinking .
It takes effort to keep a huge country like India or any huge country for that matter together . It is very hard . I think pakistan knows this very well . So that itself is an achievement for India and it is going to reap its benefits just like it bears its disadvantages

Your statements are incredible. But no surprises, after all we don't expect anything else from Indians.

Did Pakistan deployed all its army and resources!!
The ratios would have remain the same if we have the figures of deployed forces and arms and ammunition.

I give a poser, lets say Indians deployed only 60% of their tanks i.e 900 tanks. That means India lost 1 of every 3 tanks deployed. Even worse outcome.

Nobody is doing any wishful thinking. But Indians are doing their fanciful thinking of winning wars, when actually they lost. The current example of fake bravado and claims of killing 40+ Chinese soldiers compared to 22 Indian soldiers killed is not lost on us.
I repeat what I keep saying, Indians first create false narratives and then start to treat those false narratives as historical facts.
They do the same about wars with Pakistan.

 

[Dazzler]

Your statements are incredible. But no surprises, after all we don't expect anything else from Indians.

Did Pakistan deployed all its army and resources!!
The ratios would have remain the same if we have the figures of deployed forces and arms and ammunition.

I give a poser, lets say Indians deployed only 60% of their tanks i.e 900 tanks. That means India lost 1 of every 3 tanks deployed. Even worse outcome.

Nobody is doing any wishful thinking. But Indians are doing their fanciful thinking of winning wars, when actually they lost. The current example of fake bravado and claims of killing 40+ Chinese soldiers compared to 22 Indian soldiers killed is not lost on us.
I repeat what I keep saying, Indians first create false narratives and then start to treat those false narratives as historical facts.
They do the same about wars with Pakistan.

Nicely put.