‘Opportunity for Saudi Arabia to be key interlocutor between U.S., Pakistan’

[Vortex]

India finished their proxy war in Bangladesh and moved on. You won't hear lectures from the Indian establishment about destabilizing the war in East Pakistan was

who is in power in Bangladesh ? The people who is friendly to Pakistan perhaps ? You are ignoring voluntarily or unintentionally the whole context. Pure stupidity or pure hypocrisy.

Why are you assuming "anti-Pakistani" faction in Afghanistan will remain anti-Pakistani always ?

Do you know afganis tribs mindset ? Enemy once, enemy for life....!
Pure ignorance.

China is friendly now with Vietnamese proxies in Cambodia whom they fought during the cold war

I really don't know about the history and geopolitics of Vietnam and Cambodia. But aren't Geopolitical interests have changed for China due to US policy of China encirclement ?...
Pure hypocrisy.

USA is courting Vietnamese communists whom they fought 50 years ago

Yeah today they are courtising them for their China's encirclement policies, like they did with afghanis tribes against Soviets..Thats ironic, really ironic , you are talking about things without naming the real underlying driver which are the geopolitics self interests. And by his you are implicitly accepting Pakistan's policies you are fingers pointing. ! Hey you deserve the king of stupids crown and king of hypocrits crown !
And the electric shocks which @shahbaz baig is talking about wont have any effects because you don't have damaged brain but you heart is animated by Hate, Hypocrisy..

The civil war in Sri Lanka had zero impact on the economic growth of the Southern states in India

Who said a civil war brings economic growth ? The real question a wise one should or must ask is how much it costed you ?!!! Had he tamil tigers terrorists won the war, you could have some very little economics gain and strategics gains too. But Tigers failed despite your support...
Pure ignorance ? Pure hypocrisy ? Or perhaps both ?

Pakistanis are the only ones whining about a civil war from the 1980s. A civil war they chose to participate in. And one they profited from

Qoran said you are hypocrits and liars ! And it seems to be true ! We are not whinning. We are exposing our point of view because you are pointing fingers at us.dont we have this right ? It's a well recognised right by all well educated, honest and democratic people. Aren't you ? I supposed you were. I was wrong.
@shahbaz baig

 

[Dalit]

America begging the Saudis for help now.

 

[wiseone2]

who is in power in Bangladesh ? The people who is friendly to Pakistan perhaps ? You are ignoring voluntarily or unintentionally the whole context. Pure stupidity or pure hypocrisy.
@shahbaz baig

Bangladeshis have no need for you. In any case you have had anti-Indian and pro-Indian governments in Bangladesh. You do not see us supplying weapons to either faction to defend our interests

Do you know afganis tribs mindset ? Enemy once, enemy for life....!

Afghanis are no different than other humans. Spare me the BS about Afghan honor etc.

I really don't know about the history and geopolitics of Vietnam and Cambodia. But aren't Geopolitical interests have changed for China due to US policy of China encirclement ?...

Yeah today they are courtising them for their China's encirclement policies, like they did with afghanis tribes against Soviets..Thats ironic, really ironic , you are talking about things without naming the real underlying driver which are the geopolitics self interests. And by his you are implicitly accepting Pakistan's policies you are fingers pointing. ! Hey you deserve the king of stupids crown and king of hypocrits crown !
And the electric shocks which @shahbaz baig is talking about wont have any effects because you don't have damaged brain but you heart is animated by Hate, Hypocrisy..

Vietnam and USA were enemies in 1970s. They are friends now. You won't hear Vietnamese bitching about the war in the 1970s

Who said a civil war brings economic growth ? The real question a wise one should or must ask is how much it costed you ?!!! Had he tamil tigers terrorists won the war, you could have some very little economics gain and strategics gains too. But Tigers failed despite your support...

I never said civil war brings economic growth. Sri Lanka and Southern India are not complaining about the impact of the war. You will see Pakistanis complaining about all the changes due to the Afghan war in the 1980s

Qoran said you are hypocrits and liars ! And it seems to be true ! We are not whinning. We are exposing our point of view because you are pointing fingers at us.dont we have this right ? It's a well recognised right by all well educated, honest and democratic people. Aren't you ? I supposed you were. I was wrong.
@shahbaz baig

[/QUOTE]

By saying USA supported the Taliban, Osama was a CIA agent
There is nothing honest or educated about it

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Saudia is now officially devil's advocate , as it is clear with their relation with Israel and recent denial of Turkish parade Jets to reach Pakistan

 

[Vortex]

Bangladeshis have no need for you. In any case you have had anti-Indian and pro-Indian governments in Bangladesh. You do not see us supplying weapons to either faction to defend our interests

Anti inda or pro india is irrevellant when both are not so friendly to Pakistan. Isnt it ? So no need to sell weapons... Just some financial support, some RAW manipulation and you made your journey. Did russian sold weapons to Trump to help him to win election ? No.

Afghanis are no different than other humans. Spare me the BS about Afghan honor etc.

Did i said they are not humans like you or lke me ? I've said they have their cultural rules who are not same as ours or yours.
it is easy to call BS something you don't understand.

Vietnam and USA were enemies in 1970s. They are friends now. You won't hear Vietnamese bitching about the war in the 1970s

To explan somehing you have to understand the whole contexte. You are again excluding the contexte. So you are dumb or ignorant or hypocrit. Or all 3 ? I let you choose.

I never said civil war brings economic growth. Sri Lanka and Southern India are not complaining about the impact of the war. You will see Pakistanis complaining about all the changes due to the Afghan war in the 1980s

Sorry i misread the point about impact on growth. But eather positive or negative, or neutral, my answer still stand right and correct. READ AGAIN IT ALL..

By saying USA supported the Taliban, Osama was a CIA agent
There is nothing honest or educated about it

Read again all my comments.

@shahbaz baig

 

[Dalit]

Bangladeshis have no need for you. In any case you have had anti-Indian and pro-Indian governments in Bangladesh. You do not see us supplying weapons to either faction to defend our interests



Afghanis are no different than other humans. Spare me the BS about Afghan honor etc.




Vietnam and USA were enemies in 1970s. They are friends now. You won't hear Vietnamese bitching about the war in the 1970s


I never said civil war brings economic growth. Sri Lanka and Southern India are not complaining about the impact of the war. You will see Pakistanis complaining about all the changes due to the Afghan war in the 1980s

By saying USA supported the Taliban, Osama was a CIA agent
There is nothing honest or educated about it

Keep crying rivers you frustrated twat. You ain't gonna get it your way.

 

[wiseone2]

Keep crying rivers you frustrated twat. You ain't gonna get it your way.

i am not the one with trumpian logo

 

[shahbaz baig]

bro i think you both naive... @Vortex @Dalit

Bangladesh === indian supported mukti bahini + Bhutto made mistake by not accepting the mandate of Mujib Ur Rehman. And india took advantage to interfere .etc

Sri Lanka === LTTE (again Indian supported Organization)

and now both hates india.. It does not matter if they dont say about it openly you can intract, conversate with sri lankan, bangladeshi on social media so then you will know what i am saying is true. India has been surrounded with hates by india it self. (china,sri lanka, bangladesh,pakistan).

Sri linka believe on pakistan compare to india because it was pakistan who supported Sri lanka to get rid of LTTE, while Bangladesh has huge population those dont want indian influance in bangladesh. And both sri lanka and bangladesh wanna get military support (weapons) either by pakistan or china not by india. But because pakistan is not strong economically that's why india got advandage.. But now both looking toward china.

This stupid viceroy of dumb @wiseone2 Is not worth our time. Who even does not understand that why should sri lanka and bangladesh complain now when they both already got rid of militancy. On the other hand pakistan is still facing militancy in which some of indian supported (TTP,MQM,RAW kulbhushan yadav).. And this stupid viceroy of dumb wants that pakistan should not even complain.. How disgusting, narrow minded he is you can imagine by your self.

 

[Manidabest]

is US a sincere partner???

 

[wiseone2]

bro i think you both naive... @Vortex @Dalit

Bangladesh === indian supported mukti bahini + Bhutto made mistake by not accepting the mandate of Mujib Ur Rehman. And india took advantage to interfere .etc

Sri Lanka === LTTE (again Indian supported Organization)

and now both hates india.. It does not matter if they dont say about it openly you can intract, conversate with sri lankan, bangladeshi on social media so then you will know what i am saying is true. India has been surrounded with hates by india it self. (china,sri lanka, bangladesh,pakistan).

Sri linka believe on pakistan compare to india because it was pakistan who supported Sri lanka to get rid of LTTE, while Bangladesh has huge population those dont want indian influance in bangladesh. And both sri lanka and bangladesh wanna get military support (weapons) either by pakistan or china not by india. But because pakistan is not strong economically that's why india got advandage.. But now both looking toward china.

This stupid viceroy of dumb @wiseone2 Is not worth our time. Who even does not understand that why should sri lanka and bangladesh complain now when they both already got rid of militancy. On the other hand pakistan is still facing militancy in which some of indian supported (TTP,MQM,RAW kulbhushan yadav).. And this stupid viceroy of dumb wants that pakistan should not even complain.. How disgusting, narrow minded he is you can imagine by your self.

Pakistan has not got rid of militancy because they are deep playing the game since the 1980s
old habits die hard

 

[Vortex]

bro i think you both naive... @Vortex @Dalit

Bangladesh === indian supported mukti bahini + Bhutto made mistake by not accepting the mandate of Mujib Ur Rehman. And india took advantage to interfere .etc

Sri Lanka === LTTE (again Indian supported Organization)

and now both hates india.. It does not matter if they dont say about it openly you can intract, conversate with sri lankan, bangladeshi on social media so then you will know what i am saying is true. India has been surrounded with hates by india it self. (china,sri lanka, bangladesh,pakistan).

Sri linka believe on pakistan compare to india because it was pakistan who supported Sri lanka to get rid of LTTE, while Bangladesh has huge population those dont want indian influance in bangladesh. And both sri lanka and bangladesh wanna get military support (weapons) either by pakistan or china not by india. But because pakistan is not strong economically that's why india got advandage.. But now both looking toward china.

This stupid viceroy of dumb @wiseone2 Is not worth our time. Who even does not understand that why should sri lanka and bangladesh complain now when they both already got rid of militancy. On the other hand pakistan is still facing militancy in which some of indian supported (TTP,MQM,RAW kulbhushan yadav).. And this stupid viceroy of dumb wants that pakistan should not even complain.. How disgusting, narrow minded he is you can imagine by your self.

Bro, i don't have any interaction with Bangladeshis or Srilankan. But think still today these countries are irrevellant to India.
And it is what i said (ok maybe not clearly) in my post number 38 [URL='https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/opportunity-for-saudi-arabia-to-be-key-interlocutor-between-u-s-pakistan.549482/page-3#post-10350161']‘Opportunity for Saudi Arabia to be key interlocutor between U.S., Pakistan’[/URL]

And even if they are "whinning" if i could use wiseone own word their winning is not echoed in international media. Had Bangladesh has a strong army, we would have seen more destabilisation by india with whinnings from them.

Same could be said about Sri Lanka.

And wait,as you said, China's help, we will hear more whinning from india.

I know many people like wiseone...they try to fed up you and then you do mistakes and then destroy you.

But i dare @wiseone2 to look himeself in the mirror every morning and thinks about what i said

Pakistan has not got rid of militancy because they are deep playing the game since the 1980s
old habits die hard

Please study anciant times history about ld empires, how they were defeated. Starting weakening them by creating instability at their borders and then attacking them. Put this in perspective with China encirclement policies we are hearing since the end of 80's.

Please take the courage needed to studdy that.

 

[wiseone2]

I am old enough to remember that between 1996-2001 there were artillery exchanges on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan when the Taliban Emirate/Caliphate was an 'arm' of Pakistan. Also, while the Mullah Umar Emirate had virtually conquered all of Afghanistan and were very dependent on Pakistan--they still didn't recognize the Durand Line as international border.

So why would the Talibans be more friendly to Pakistan now especially they were dumped in 2001 by Pakistan?

every rebel movement seeking recognition has a public face. The Taliban has none. I would not be surprised they were an arm of the pakistani state

where is the taliban going to get weapons from ? the mighty Americans use pakistan as a supply line to Afghanistan