What's new

Opinionated - Chechen fighters in the battle of Kyiv and the new world order

This Chechen who lead the assault as reported by many foreign journalist
 
There is an element of panic in the Ukrainians. Handing out weapons to civilians, making Molotov cocktails and teaching grannies how to shoot does not show preparedness, planning or effective organization.


reportedly, these citizen militias are panicking already and have shot own forces
 
Just compare Chechen vs Russian

And Ukraine vs Russian.

Ukraine is also supported by the West highly while Chechen is alone during that time. Chechen can only be defeated after one faction leave the independence movement and join Russian Army. And also after Dudayev is killed when he negotiated with Russian using plane who track the phone location

Chechen is not a big population region.

This is the clear different of Muslim soldiers vs Non Muslim soldiers.
 
TOS - 1 ki thermobaric firebombing waali pitai ke after effects lol
 
@Joe Shearer @Irfan Baloch @PanzerKiel @HRK @gambit @The Eagle @SQ8

Do you guys think that US wanted Russia to attack Ukarine, knowing they won't help and Ukarine cannot defend? Perhaps, a repeat of what US suffered in Afg? As war may protect Russia interests but will make it weaker, sanctioned and suffered.
Or it is a calculated move that US is busy in Pacific so let's deflate the NATO bubble and also expand Russian influence in the hood.
Should we discuss it in a thread?
 
@Joe Shearer @Irfan Baloch @PanzerKiel @HRK @gambit @The Eagle @SQ8

Do you guys think that US wanted Russia to attack Ukarine, knowing they won't help and Ukarine cannot defend? Perhaps, a repeat of what US suffered in Afg? As war may protect Russia interests but will make it weaker, sanctioned and suffered.
Or it is a calculated move that US is busy in Pacific so let's deflate the NATO bubble and also expand Russian influence in the hood.
Should we discuss it in a thread?

In my view it is Israel, who wanted Russia to attack Ukraine.
Let us not forget that US policies are heavily influenced by Israeli interests.
The project of NEW WORLD ORDER was written by Henry Kissinger - the ultimate Zionist.
The current President of Ukraine is a Zionist Jew.

Russia was left with only two options: 1). accept that Ukraine goes to EU and the whole of Western border of Russia is exposed or 2). take over Ukraine.
 
In my view it is Israel, who wanted Russia to attack Ukraine.
Let us not forget that US policies are heavily influenced by Israeli interests.
The project of NEW WORLD ORDER was written by Henry Kissinger - the ultimate Zionist.
The current President of Ukraine is a Zionist Jew.

Russia was left with only two options: 1). accept that Ukraine goes to EU and the whole of Western border of Russia is exposed or 2). take over Ukraine.
I mean.. I don't take it that far but there are beneficiries of such event, even win-win parties. The point is if US isn't afraid of Russian hegemony over EU, then why she enticed Ukr to join NATO? Else, they just wanna make Russia angry to make a move. Last war was fought in 2014. Plenty of time, to stregnthen Ukr, but they didn't.
 
@Joe Shearer @Irfan Baloch @PanzerKiel @HRK @gambit @The Eagle @SQ8

Do you guys think that US wanted Russia to attack Ukarine, knowing they won't help and Ukarine cannot defend? Perhaps, a repeat of what US suffered in Afg? As war may protect Russia interests but will make it weaker, sanctioned and suffered.
Or it is a calculated move that US is busy in Pacific so let's deflate the NATO bubble and also expand Russian influence in the hood.
Should we discuss it in a thread?
I think it was just ineptitude.
I think it is the pusillanimous response of a president who should never have been elected to this position, being totally senile and incompetent.
I think, speaking as an historian, that I am lucky to have lived to see the end of the British Empire, of the Soviet Empire, and now, of the American Empire.
I am reminded that American intelligence (leaving out the oxymoron jokes that are tiresome after a while) has been consistent, for the best part of a century now. It has been consistently wrong, it has been consistently wicked.
I should also like to hear from @PanzerKiel and @gambit; would they agree that the US has not won a war since 1945?
Finally, from thinking that it was collusion between the Chinese and the Russians, I have begun to feel that China - almost as much as India - is totally flummoxed about the situation, and has no clue about what to do next. I was extrapolating it to mean that Taiwan would be a target next, but was vehemently opposed by @Nilgiri, who stated quite bluntly that Chinese culture and administration was completely against this. I don't know....

Do make it a thread. Please consider this my first note in it.
 
I mean.. I don't take it that far but there are beneficiries of such event, even win-win parties. The point is if US isn't afraid of Russian hegemony over EU, then why she enticed Ukr to join NATO? Else, they just wanna make Russia angry to make a move. Last war was fought in 2014. Plenty of time, to stregnthen Ukr, but they didn't.

You are right Sir!

Ukraine has been used as a bait.
 
That's the one.

What's the matter, are you an animal-hater? What do you have against poodles?


I honestly hadn't noticed that you'd changed your name.

I actually have a long-standing phobia to dogs that I've only somewhat gotten over recently. Guilty as charged, m'lord.
 
@Joe Shearer @Irfan Baloch @PanzerKiel @HRK @gambit @The Eagle @SQ8

Do you guys think that US wanted Russia to attack Ukarine, knowing they won't help and Ukarine cannot defend? Perhaps, a repeat of what US suffered in Afg? As war may protect Russia interests but will make it weaker, sanctioned and suffered.
Or it is a calculated move that US is busy in Pacific so let's deflate the NATO bubble and also expand Russian influence in the hood.
Should we discuss it in a thread?

This war may not be good for economy of Russia but it is good strategically for both Russia and China, so later should support Russia economically during and after war, it's time SCO countries create some thing equivalent to NATO (excluding India).

I think it was just ineptitude.
I think it is the pusillanimous response of a president who should never have been elected to this position, being totally senile and incompetent.
I think, speaking as an historian, that I am lucky to have lived to see the end of the British Empire, of the Soviet Empire, and now, of the American Empire.
I am reminded that American intelligence (leaving out the oxymoron jokes that are tiresome after a while) has been consistent, for the best part of a century now. It has been consistently wrong, it has been consistently wicked.
I should also like to hear from @PanzerKiel and @gambit; would they agree that the US has not won a war since 1945?
Finally, from thinking that it was collusion between the Chinese and the Russians, I have begun to feel that China - almost as much as India - is totally flummoxed about the situation, and has no clue about what to do next. I was extrapolating it to mean that Taiwan would be a target next, but was vehemently opposed by @Nilgiri, who stated quite bluntly that Chinese culture and administration was completely against this. I don't know....

Do make it a thread. Please consider this my first note in it.

Chinese don't want to use weapons against fellow Chinese, if China ever launch invasion of Taiwan then something have gone terribly wrong.
 
TOS - 1 ki thermobaric firebombing waali pitai ke after effects lol
LOL, they kept fighting even after that, and then rose in rebellion again in 2000s. these are loyalist cucks not "mujahideen", who sided with russia during wars of independence.
 
I actually have a long-standing phobia to dogs that I've only somewhat gotten over recently. Guilty as charged, m'lord.
I was kidding, and hit a button. I'm very pro-dog, and they like me. I'm not very pro-human, and THEY don't like me :o:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom