No, India doesn't have anything 100% indigenous or in house. Most Indian projects were either inspired from or were directly bought from countries. Most countries started like this. US got from Europe and China & India got from USSR & France
Some countries mere bought and used, some countries tried assembling to learn the curve, some even expanded their infrastructure more to learn and near completely produce the system in house. Civil industry and MIC are interlinked in society.
Pakistan lies way behind in the industrial curve. So, it's military MIC is isolated and was built purposely. So capabilities too are limited due to limited budget & cost.
But for sure you can measure the degree by calculating added value or number of components. For example, missile technologies have 94 classifications in 2017. Here you can see difference between the countries.
India : 81
Pakistan : 39
China : 92
Iran: 21
Israel: 74
Turkey: 4
USA:94
UK:94
Russia:94
France: 93
Japan: 93
Saudi Arabia:0
North Korea:25
South Africa : 34
South Korea: 42
Vietnam: 0
This is 2017 list BTW. I have here measured at least one parameter of technology to compare which explains why India can make AAMs, ABMs and ASATs etc. while Pak can't.
No, I'm saying that you will just keep spamming this comment while Pakistan will never do anything more than calling Indians Nazis on international forum and asking for help, will desperately keep asking for talks, while power differential between India and Pakistan will always keep growing.
I will keep logging in this forum in every few months to remind you that no change has happened.
That's a no brainer. Low IQ Indians rank highest in Central, South, Southeast Asia, Middle-east and Latin America in scientific output and have innovations per capita equivalent to Europe, administering major firms.
An IQ of 500 can't help you unless you have learnt for which you need help of someone experienced. As far as taking lead is concerned, Power = Military & Economics = Money = Population*Income
Colonial Era Europe had unlimited resources from colonies and end of most colonies after WW2 induced US & USSR to top who had large educated populations capable of exploiting opportunities while China & India were dirt poor despite huge populations. Normalisation of their income levels gave them a huge GDP industry (and obvious difference in early policies and management) now explains gap between two, current policies will explain for future. The same as difference between Vietnam vs Bangladesh where Pakistani industry lies even at lower pedestal. Nigeria will gradually start taking lead over China & India in population and cycle continues.