What's new

Opinion of China of China WorldWide - 2011

i hope no on hates anyone. thats barbaric and tribal i think we can be past that by now. its ok to hate governments but not whole countries. ii dislike the ccp but love the Chinese kids at my gym. i pray that no one on this forum sits around stewing in there hate for any one based on race or birth land. remember its the governments that rule were just like MCG drops in an ocean.
 
.
☪☪☪☪;1990739 said:
Turkish People support ETIM which China is crushing as it is a terrorist organization but Turkish Nationalists support it hence anti china feeling.

not only ETIM.when Vayag pass through Turkey,they extorted china a lot of money
 
.
I understand why Japan dislike China because China put up a hell of a fight when they invaded but why does Turkey dislike China?

LoL joke of a propagandist. Japan ruled over China so cut that crap out.

Re the perception, Turkey dislikes China because of the attacks on the Uighurs and the deprivation of their right to life and their own region by the migrant Han population which is being systematically moved to Xinxiang by the Chinese communist party.

East Turkmenistan Independence Movement.

.
 
.
i hope no on hates anyone. thats barbaric and tribal i think we can be past that by now. its ok to hate governments but not whole countries. ii dislike the ccp but love the Chinese kids at my gym. i pray that no one on this forum sits around stewing in there hate for any one based on race or birth land. remember its the governments that rule were just like MCG drops in an ocean.

Your thoughts are admirable, however the actions of a government also benefits its people against those that are deprived due to the same actions. So it is natural that the beneficiaries will also be viewed with the same perspective as that of the agressor government. In China currently for example, if the communist party is systematically settling Hans in Xinxiang, it is only natural that the Uighurs will also identify these migrants as a a form of their deprivation and persecution. So by the end, it does get personal however much we may wish it does not. That is the unfortunate part. In retribution, human beings are not so philosphical!
 
.
LoL joke of a propagandist. Japan ruled over China so cut that crap out.

Japan ruled over only Manchuria and Taiwan, on the mainland besides Manchuria they will occupiers fighting a non-stop Chinese resistance.

Britain on the other hand ruled over India (for 200+ years). Indians behaved so obediently to the British domination of their country, which is why the Brits today hold no grudges towards Indians and are quite favorable of India and Indians are also very favorable of Britain for ruling them better than they can rule themselves, but if Indians actually resisted against the British invaders then India too would be hated by them.
 
.
Japan ruled over only Manchuria and Taiwan, on the mainland besides Manchuria they will occupiers fighting a non-stop Chinese resistance.

Britain on the other hand ruled over India (for 200+ years). Indians behaved so obediently to the British domination of their country, which is why the Brits today hold no grudges towards Indians and are quite favorable of India and Indians are also very favorable of Britain for ruling them better than they can rule themselves, but if Indians actually resisted against the British invaders then India too would be hated by them.

Let us keep India out. We do not lie about the fact that the British ruled over India. We are pretty reconciled to our past and that is why no use trying to bring that up. We know what happened. On the other hand your propaganda effort was foolish. And just in case if you would like to bring up something more, I know the past of Shanghai, Hong Kong, Qingdao too. There is ancestry there. No use denying the past. The knowledge of it makes one stronger.

So how is China liked in Vietnam? I would love to see some research on opinion of China in Vietnam, Malaysia, Cambodia, Laos, Phillipinnes etc. That will be interesting to gauge the peaceful rise.

.
 
.
LoL joke of a propagandist. Japan ruled over China so cut that crap out.
.

Chinese always chose to fight when facing invasion. this was proved in 1840 fighting British invaders and in WWII against Japan, know that chinese troops were with British troops in Myanmar fighting Japanese? without that, they might have reached all Asia.
even proved in Korea war when the danger was approaching.
again, without Chinese people's sacrifice, Japan would have ruled the whole Asia, including India. See their plan to conquer the whole world eventually.
the whole Asia owe a lot to China. and because of winning WWII, china becomes one of the 5 leads in UN. no pains, no gains.
i think you need a little study of history.
 
.
first of all, the data is not bad.
i know a lot of Chinese brothers are concerned of such topic. but my suggestion is to take it easy. behave like a big country. look back in the history, you have gene to be a super power.
I don't think the whole world loves U.S, but check the U.S people, they're ok.

this is what chinese people have to experience when the nation is growing, especially the countries around are not used to it. some nations get nervous, some scared like Japan. so when you're strong finally and send 5 carriers out of there, people will get used to it and feel fine.
take Japan for example, they are U.S enemy, but when U.S dropped A-bomb, they welcome U.S solders and became a friend.
 
.
Chinese always chose to fight when facing invasion. this was proved in 1840 fighting British invaders and in WWII against Japan, know that chinese troops were with British troops in Myanmar fighting Japanese? without that, they might have reached all Asia.
even proved in Korea war when the danger was approaching.
again, without Chinese people's sacrifice, Japan would have ruled the whole Asia, including India. See their plan to conquer the whole world eventually.
the whole Asia owe a lot to China. and because of winning WWII, china becomes one of the 5 leads in UN. no pains, no gains.
i think you need a little study of history.
1.Japan could not rule the whole Asia,simply, their country is too small to dominate all Asia in short time, they don;t have enough men to do that. their main purpose was just try to conquer China, but they defeated you so easily, that why their have a chance to think about conquering the whole Asia, Asia must blame a Big country like you, how come a big could fall so easily like that. too bad.

2. During Mogol, Manchurian ocupation, some Chinese offices fled to VietNam , so I don't think Chinese will face with all invasion, don't use "spiritual victories" like Mr.Ah Q , bro :p:
 
.
1.Japan could not rule the whole Asia,simply, their country is too small to dominate all Asia in short time, they don;t have enough men to do that. their main purpose was just try to conquer China, but they defeated you so easily, that why their have a chance to think about conquering the whole Asia, Asia must blame a Big country like you, how come a big could fall so easily like that. too bad.

Britain was also a small country and they ruled almost the entire world. Japan was a lot much more powerful than China at the time because,

1. Japan was unified industrialized/modernized, they were fielding the most advanced planes, tanks, machine guns, bombs while China was using whatever they could get their hands on.

2. China was un-unified, had no industrial base, attempts at modernization were stamped out by the corrupt Qing court

3. When the Qing Dynasty collapsed it ushered an era of unrest throughout the entire country and civil war between the KMT, CCP and various warlord factions split the country further.

How Japan was not able to capitalize on their total advantage and take over the entire country is no mystery -- Chinese people never gave up fighting despite the condition of the country unlike in India were a mere thousand British walked in and several hundred million Indians surrendered.

Just because a country is big doesn't mean they can't fall, it only means they fall harder. India for example, a country about the same size as China fell to a force of 3000 British invaders, while there were over 3,000,000 Japanese soldiers in China fighting.
 
.
1.Japan could not rule the whole Asia,simply, their country is too small to dominate all Asia in short time, they don;t have enough men to do that. their main purpose was just try to conquer China, but they defeated you so easily, that why their have a chance to think about conquering the whole Asia, Asia must blame a Big country like you, how come a big could fall so easily like that. too bad.

2. During Mogol, Manchurian ocupation, some Chinese offices fled to VietNam , so I don't think Chinese will face with all invasion, don't use "spiritual victories" like Mr.Ah Q , bro :p:

check U.S media Vietnam during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, no propaganda, see how Japan invaded Vietnam, how much loss of vietnam during Japanese occupation and how chinese people supported Vietnam at the time.
you don't need to attack China by ignoring the history. just say "china sucks" for no reason.
a lot of people even in west say "U.S sucks", they are fine with it.
big nations, not that they are big in size, but big in "mind"
 
.
check U.S media Vietnam during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, no propaganda, see how Japan invaded Vietnam, how much loss of vietnam during Japanese occupation and how chinese people supported Vietnam at the time.
you don't need to attack China by ignoring the history. just say "china sucks" for no reason.
a lot of people even in west say "U.S sucks", they are fine with it.
big nations, not that they are big in size, but big in "mind"

BCz of China's fallen, so we have to fight with Japan. France was not so bad during occupation time, they even joined Laos-Cam in Vietnam to create Indochina, and protected our islands in SCS(East sea) quiet well also.

As a big coutry, you must feel shameful when let a small coutry conquered China so easily instead of thinking another Asia owe China's sacrifice.infact, CHinese owe VN alot during Mogol and Manchus's invasion.
 
.
Britain was also a small country and they ruled almost the entire world. Japan was a lot much more powerful than China at the time because,

1. Japan was unified industrialized/modernized, they were fielding the most advanced planes, tanks, machine guns, bombs while China was using whatever they could get their hands on.

2. China was un-unified, had no industrial base, attempts at modernization were stamped out by the corrupt Qing court

3. When the Qing Dynasty collapsed it ushered an era of unrest throughout the entire country and civil war between the KMT, CCP and various warlord factions split the country further.

How Japan was not able to capitalize on their total advantage and take over the entire country is no mystery -- Chinese people never gave up fighting despite the condition of the country unlike in India were a mere thousand British walked in and several hundred million Indians surrendered.

Just because a country is big doesn't mean they can't fall, it only means they fall harder. India for example, a country about the same size as China fell to a force of 3000 British invaders, while there were over 3,000,000 Japanese soldiers in China fighting.

Mr.Pulto said that: "Asia countries owe China's sacrifice during Japan's invasion", but in fact, if Japan could not conquer China so easily, they would not have time , men and supplies to conquers VN or India.

They must say thanks to VN during Mongol, Manchus's invasion than thinking Asia owe their sacrifice during WW 2
 
.
Mr.Pulto said that: "Asia countries owe China's sacrifice during Japan's invasion", but in fact, if Japan could not conquer China so easily, they would not have time , men and supplies to conquers VN or India.

They must say thanks to VN during Mongol, Manchus's invasion than thinking Asia owe their sacrifice during WW 2

All countries made sacrifices during the Japanese invasion, not just China.

Asian countries must be united together so something like that can never happen again.
 
.
Britain was also a small country and they ruled almost the entire world. Japan was a lot much more powerful than China at the time because,

1. Japan was unified industrialized/modernized, they were fielding the most advanced planes, tanks, machine guns, bombs while China was using whatever they could get their hands on.

2. China was un-unified, had no industrial base, attempts at modernization were stamped out by the corrupt Qing court

3. When the Qing Dynasty collapsed it ushered an era of unrest throughout the entire country and civil war between the KMT, CCP and various warlord factions split the country further.

How Japan was not able to capitalize on their total advantage and take over the entire country is no mystery -- Chinese people never gave up fighting despite the condition of the country unlike in India were a mere thousand British walked in and several hundred million Indians surrendered.

Just because a country is big doesn't mean they can't fall, it only means they fall harder. India for example, a country about the same size as China fell to a force of 3000 British invaders, while there were over 3,000,000 Japanese soldiers in China fighting.

very well said but why bother reply to that troll
 
.
Back
Top Bottom