Pakistan Space Agency
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 5,327
- Reaction score
- -29
- Country
- Location
OPINION: Is the Su-30SM/MKI/MKM A Super Agile Fighter?
January 21, 2020
By sDanials
I think the press has gone too far in promoting the awesomeness and fearsome reputation of the Sukhoi Su-30SM Flanker-H. The magazines have printed an image of a super agile fighter which can be difficult to beat but in the case of the Indian Su-30MKI being shot down in the last skirmish with Pakistani JF-17, has put me into some surprise.
The JF-17 is Pakistani's most important jet fighter and is on the same level as those of the Indian Tejas and Saab Gripen. However what i can understand is how did this little lightweight fighter is able to shoot down a super agile fighter which have the thrust vectoring nozzles, a big radars and can carry 10 advance air to air missiles. We can understand that the Russian missiles supposed to have an edge over the Chinese built missiles but this is not the case. The Indians did evaluate the circumstances of the shot down and it boiled down to reliability of the Russian air to air missiles like the R-77 Adder and R-73 Archer which both have failed tremendously to the stage that the Indian Air Force recently came out that they weren't happy with the Russian missiles for being unreliable and was in discussion with the Israelis about using their missiles on all their fighters.
The other area is this. Did the Indian Air Force used the missiles as a statement or was it falsified to cloak the quality of pilot tactics or even the systems used on the Su-30MKI or being merely the jet is big enough that its RCS can be seen far away on a JF-17 radar system? How the Su-30MKI was shot down is a mystery. Some will say BVR engagement while some will say dogfighting. Was it a 1-to-1 affair or did more than 1 JF-17 jumped on the single Su-30MKI?
But it has prove one thing. The Su-30MKI is not a legend as many people. Meaning it can be shot down even by a light fighter like the JF-17. The Pakistani jet performance is similar to the F-16A, very nimble and very agile and its a very much a hot hatch. Its probable that the Su-30MKI was shot down with a Chinese PL-12 which was design with Russian assistance but i can assume that Israel has some helping hand in improving the Chinese missile. What i can't fathom is this. The PL-12 uses the same technology as the R-77 Adder and it worked. Do we boil it down to either issues with the Indians mis-maintaining their R-77 missiles which is why it failed or do you put the blame on the pilot, or was it pure bad luck. The Su-30MKI should have a much lower workload given it has a 2-pilot crew. So what give?
Whatever it is, the United State used this evidence and records to understand the tactic and training of Pakistani pilots against India's own pilot tactics. I am pretty sure the US was surprised by the shot down of both jets, given that the Su-30MKI represent the latest state of the art super jet as all said it was and the upgraded MiG-21 which became the Bison and had all the latest technologies with R-77 and R-73 missiles. Technically the MiG-21 was supposed to be on equal par with the JF-17 because of these technologies including HMS but could it be quality radar and even tactics to blame for the shot down?
Now lets look at the bigger picture here. Pakistan will definitely increase their JF-17 fighter order towards the 450 mark. The JF-17 that shot down the MiG-21 and Su-30MKI was a Block 2 model. Now with the introduction of Block 3, its even more lethal in the air. So what would you say about your view on this..Readers, please given a comment on this on your view and share this with other readers on how this happen?
https://theairforcequaterlyjournal....opinion-is-su-30smmkimkm-super-agile.html?m=1
January 21, 2020
By sDanials
I think the press has gone too far in promoting the awesomeness and fearsome reputation of the Sukhoi Su-30SM Flanker-H. The magazines have printed an image of a super agile fighter which can be difficult to beat but in the case of the Indian Su-30MKI being shot down in the last skirmish with Pakistani JF-17, has put me into some surprise.
The JF-17 is Pakistani's most important jet fighter and is on the same level as those of the Indian Tejas and Saab Gripen. However what i can understand is how did this little lightweight fighter is able to shoot down a super agile fighter which have the thrust vectoring nozzles, a big radars and can carry 10 advance air to air missiles. We can understand that the Russian missiles supposed to have an edge over the Chinese built missiles but this is not the case. The Indians did evaluate the circumstances of the shot down and it boiled down to reliability of the Russian air to air missiles like the R-77 Adder and R-73 Archer which both have failed tremendously to the stage that the Indian Air Force recently came out that they weren't happy with the Russian missiles for being unreliable and was in discussion with the Israelis about using their missiles on all their fighters.
The other area is this. Did the Indian Air Force used the missiles as a statement or was it falsified to cloak the quality of pilot tactics or even the systems used on the Su-30MKI or being merely the jet is big enough that its RCS can be seen far away on a JF-17 radar system? How the Su-30MKI was shot down is a mystery. Some will say BVR engagement while some will say dogfighting. Was it a 1-to-1 affair or did more than 1 JF-17 jumped on the single Su-30MKI?
But it has prove one thing. The Su-30MKI is not a legend as many people. Meaning it can be shot down even by a light fighter like the JF-17. The Pakistani jet performance is similar to the F-16A, very nimble and very agile and its a very much a hot hatch. Its probable that the Su-30MKI was shot down with a Chinese PL-12 which was design with Russian assistance but i can assume that Israel has some helping hand in improving the Chinese missile. What i can't fathom is this. The PL-12 uses the same technology as the R-77 Adder and it worked. Do we boil it down to either issues with the Indians mis-maintaining their R-77 missiles which is why it failed or do you put the blame on the pilot, or was it pure bad luck. The Su-30MKI should have a much lower workload given it has a 2-pilot crew. So what give?
Whatever it is, the United State used this evidence and records to understand the tactic and training of Pakistani pilots against India's own pilot tactics. I am pretty sure the US was surprised by the shot down of both jets, given that the Su-30MKI represent the latest state of the art super jet as all said it was and the upgraded MiG-21 which became the Bison and had all the latest technologies with R-77 and R-73 missiles. Technically the MiG-21 was supposed to be on equal par with the JF-17 because of these technologies including HMS but could it be quality radar and even tactics to blame for the shot down?
Now lets look at the bigger picture here. Pakistan will definitely increase their JF-17 fighter order towards the 450 mark. The JF-17 that shot down the MiG-21 and Su-30MKI was a Block 2 model. Now with the introduction of Block 3, its even more lethal in the air. So what would you say about your view on this..Readers, please given a comment on this on your view and share this with other readers on how this happen?
https://theairforcequaterlyjournal....opinion-is-su-30smmkimkm-super-agile.html?m=1