"...the HRCP is doing a fair evaluation, it can easily contact those journalists to determine what the situation is."
I'd suggest that the HRCP has ALREADY done a fair evaluation and indicates that it has other versions. There's no indication that they haven't seeked out the testimony of others. Indeed they have knowledge of contrary versions.
Perhaps they do, and perhaps those versions point to isolated cases, such as those seen in the US military, which in conjunction with a lot of other circumstantial evidence is being used to unfairly paint the extra-judicial killings and mass graves (all of which have other explanations) as some sort of institutional policy by the Army.
None of the information presented by the HRCP publicly offers any evidence beyond isolated cases - the rest of their allegations are extrapolations based on those few cases.
And as I pointed out earlier:
1. Several accounts in the Pakistani press and on this forum have pointed out that revenge killings by the locals have taken place.
2. Mass graves were pointed out by the PA as having been dug by the militants at the start of the Swat operation, long before any of these accusations came about.
3. The PA also pointed out that it had dug mass graves to bury large numbers of killed militants in the CZ since there were no residents left and single burials were not feasible.
4. The PA has actually arrested thousands (or over a thousand, can't remember exactly) of suspected Taliban. There would be a lot more extrajudicial killings if this was the preferred means of 'disposal' by the PA.
They've asked for an independant inquiry. Is that too much? Why would you be uncomfortable with such. Is there no precedent for independant investigations? How about your national assembly? Do they hold any interest over affairs within your country affecting your citizens?
An independent inquiry by the GoP? Surely not international agencies - the US herslef does not allow her soldiers to be tried by international courts AFAIK.
And yes there is a precedent for independent investigations of the Army and government, as illustrated by the Hamood-ur-Rehman commission (declassified under Musharraf's regime), which had a scathing indictment of the military and political leadership in East Pakistan after an extremely comprehensive review of the people involved and communications and documentation from both the civilian and military side. It also ended up debunking the outrageous genocide and millions killed claims, placing the death toll at tens of thousands, based on all available evidence at least.
So I do see worth in such an investigation, though I do not see any justification for it at this point. If there is justification, the GoP can be petitioned, the case in favor of such an investigation made, and if a valid case, perhaps a commission to investigate can be appointed.
O.k. I disagree as there's more than ONE allegation and they hardly appear unsubstantiated to a neutral eye.
Even a handful of cases would not be proof of an institutional policy of pursuing extra judicial killings, and there are far more accounts indicating extra judicial killings by local residents than there are of blaming the Army.
Your government's behavior about the press from SWAT until now coupled with the coincidental occurrence of possible crimes then AND now suggests that they are bent on keeping a cloak over matters.
The extra judicial killings started after the people of Swat returned, and their return meant that any chance of keeping a lid on events in Swat ended as well. So in the case of the extra judicial killings at least, the Press should not have issues with reporting on them, and they have - that is where all the accounts from local residents suggesting locals out for vengeance are committing them come from.
HRCP has done nothing more than plainly state they've allegations to the contrary and call for an independant inquiry. That seems reasonable but I do notice a reticence by everybody concerned to take it to that level.
Why is that?
As I pointed out above, I have no issue per se with an independent inquiry, since there is precedent for it, but such a request should be vetted by the GoP to determine whether it requires an inquiry or not - can't go off on wild goose chases every time someone thinks something is amiss.
No doubt your military will continue to stage-manage its news. Evidently you've placed blind trust as paramount in this time of crisis. Fair enough.
You're certainly not the first military to muzzle the press. I think that it's wrong and harms your army when I know that there's much good which comes from seeing soldiers in something other than a postured dog & pony show.
It's your country and you can handle the consequences I suppose. Evidently your ISPR presumes the consequences of access would be worse.
I wonder what they know or fear would arise from the press being with actual troops near the actual battles.
I suppose your army is just thinking of the danger to those journalists from such exposure.
Thank goodness for their concern if so.
I have explained my reasons for why I think the military should keep control over the flow of information from the CZ - people like Bill Roggio who pounce on every bit of negative information and distort it to push a particular agenda cement my belief that information related to short term objectives failures/successes should be controlled to avoid out of context reporting and dissemblance that we often see in the Western and Pakistani media.
With the civilian population out of the region, this is purely a military battle for now, and I fail to see what advantages an embedded journalist would bring. The Army is doing a decent job getting images, reports and video out, and only the highly informed and interested readers are going to nitpick over it - for a large number of Pakistanis these images and reports convey success and pride, and hopefully perpetuate and strengthen public support for the operation in Waziristan.
Once active combat to retake the majority of the territory is over, and citizens can return, the importance of a free press becomes paramount again. Then we do need independent views to obtain information about the extent of reconstruction, aid needed, aid delivered, local sentiment etc. .... and yes, coverage of any 'extra judicial killings'.