"...expect more violence, terrorist attacks on innocents in Pakistan."
But your afghan taliban killing civilians in Afghanistan is perfectly acceptable to Pakistanis? Too bad Pakistan hasn't forthrightly told its citizens that these are bad men and won't be tolerated ruling Pakistanis nor Afghans.
You do KNOW that the taliban have been responsible for the vast majority of those killed in Afghanistan according to UNAMA, correct? If not, let me help educate you-
Afghanistan Mid-Year Bulletin On The Protection Of Civilians In Armed Conflict-July 2009
4...."UNAMA Human Right figures indicate that more civilians are being killed by AGEs [Anti-Government Elements] than by PGF [Pro-Government Forces]. In the first six months of 2009, 59% of civilians were killed by AGEs and 30.5% by PGF.
9. A continuing trend seen through 2008 and into the first six months of 2009 is that AGE [Anti-Government Elements] tactics have shifted, from frontal or ambush attacks on PGF [Pro-Government Forces], to insurgent or guerrilla type activities, including asymmetric attacks such as IEDs, VBIEDs, BBIEDs, (that remain responsible for the largest number of civilian deaths), and targeted assassinations.
10. Between January and June 2009, 595 civilian deaths were attributed to AGE activities; 400 of those deaths were the result of indiscriminate IED and suicide attacks. This represents 67% of all deaths attributable to AGEs, or 39.5% of the total 1013 civilians killed in the first half of 2009. AGE operations are frequently undertaken regardless of the impact on civilians in terms of deaths and injuries or destruction of civilian infrastructure. Based on investigation of specific incidents conducted by UNAMA Human Rights, information suggests that AGEs are basing themselves in civilian areas so as to deliberately blur the distinction between combatants and civilians, and as part of what appears to be an active policy aimed at drawing a military response to areas where there is a high likelihood that civilians will be killed or injured. Also of great concern to UNAMA Human Rights, is the frequency by which AGEs conduct attacks in, or against, civilian locations. UNAMA Human Rights continues to document IED attacks carried out on roads used by civilian traffic, residential compounds, and market places. In some areas, UNAMA Human Rights has also noted targeted assassinations of civilians through the use of IEDs, particularly in the South-East.
So afghan civilians die at a rate of 2:1 at the hands of their protectors-the Afghan taliban. Worse, they do so as intentional targets all too often. When that isn't happening, the afghan taliban are documented as using afghan civilians as human shields.
There's no functional difference in the intent of the afghan taliban from the Pakistani taliban. Both intend to rule by fiat and muslim sharia law in a manifestly cruel and onerous fashion. We've PLENTY of evidence already of what that means for Afghanistan and Pakistan has had its own taste in SWAT and Buner.
Oddly enough, that which you decisively reject for yourselves would be happily foisted onto the Afghans if Pakistanis were to have your way.
Just can't seem to break the need to enslave the afghans to your ambitions?
Thanks.