I really thought deeply, before I wrote this Reply. Since you sound like an obnoxious teenager who memorises stuff from Brochures and then uses those in arguments. But I can’t be too mad, I used to be one, going back to the PDF days 20 years ago. Makes me cringe as I enter middle age.
Lets deal with what you wrote one by one, but first let’s dispense with the silliest bit in your post, that a Repaer could carry 8 Shahpar II…no kt can’, it’s not a B52. The Repear has 7 hard points, and it can carry a little under a 1000 kg, total.
1) As far as GIDS is concerned, they don’t have much if any information, they don’t even have a picture in their brochure, just an illistration.
So it’s utterly useless.
2) We don’t know much besides endurance (greater than 14 hours, which incidentally is the USAF numbers for the MQ9) and speed.
No idea as to range, load-out, MTOW. It not even clear what type of engine it has, a turboprop or a powerful piston. Or what kind of additional external fuel it can carry and how much.
3) All we have is OSINT about it being used and a picture from the Pak Day parade and that can be used for extrapolation. It’s clear it’s a big air frame, when compared with its older brother, the Shahpar I or even its cousin Burraq. Using that we can at best guesstimate it’s performance, using the square cube law, it has much more internal volume than the afore mentioned UAVs and using their numbers we can make a guess as to the Shahpar II performance, of,course it’s a guess rather than a firm number.
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) reckons that it’s performance is somewhere between a late model Predator and a Repear and I think that’s a sound guess as any.
When we compare two systems, we compare roles rather than exact minutiae of specificactions, for instance the Blackhawk and Mi17 are often compared, since their roles are similar both are medium lift helicopters even though the Mi17 can carry almost 50 percent more cargo by weight
Shahpar and the Reaper fulfill similar roles and provide similar capabilities, even though the Reaper probably has more advanced specifications.