Operation Asifa: 45 Indian soldiers killed by Kashmiri resistance in Pulwama.

[M. Sarmad]

What do you think is going to happen? Do you think killing 40 odd soldiers in a dastardly attack is going to make these morons overthrow the Indian regime? No, just like innocent Indian soldiers were killed - India will retaliate and kill Pak soldiers. Remember even during Kargil, India shot down an Atlantique aircraft of Pak near Kutch and Pak took India to ICJ and lost the case. So loss of life on this side will result in loss of life on the other. I will not cheer though - I don't think anyone should die because of egos of nations.

• Pakistan did not kill those 40 Indian soldiers.
• Those soldiers were not 'innocent'.
• Acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying forces and Attacks on Legitimate military targets are not "Terror" attacks.

 

[Tom M]

Read post # 229 again, carefully

No need I guess, until and unless no one has legally demanded India nor initiated any litigation in any of the International courts for non compliance even after long 70 years speaks for itself.

 

[Jackdaws]

• Pakistan did not kill those 40 Indian soldiers.
• Those soldiers were not 'innocent'.
• Acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying forces and Attacks on Legitimate military targets are not "Terror" attacks.

Jaish is based in Pak.

Pak and its ally China have shielded Jaish from being declared a terror organization.

There is no occupying force.

 

[randomradio]

Hence the impasse. I always felt that if Pakistan approached the UN before the first Kashmir conflict, before deciding to invade Kashmir, a settlement would have been reached.

No. Kashmir was going to be a free nation. Both India and Pakistan had agreed to that beforehand. But after independence was achieved, Pakistan invaded and inadvertently handed over Kashmir to India 'cause they couldn't hold on to what they had already taken.

 

[Corona]

But they remain the only mutually agreed upon means to resolve the dispute - the government of India committed to them multiple times before eventually reneging on them. They also remain the only moral and just solution to resolve a conflict and dispute over territory - allow the people that belong to the land of J&K to determine freely which country they wish to be a part of. As the self-proclaimed world's largest democracy, India, of all countries, should respect this means of dispute resolution.

Democracy doesn't mean hand something to someone just because they ask for it.

Self preservation comes first. The Indian democracy is bound by its constitution, not by any random definition of democracy.

Like most democracies, it's not perfect but it works for us.

 

[Tom M]

ok, keep rejoicing. you have a moment to rejoice now.

I bet we will get one soon. Just keep your fingers crossed.

 

[Corona]

Referendum is the only option.[emoji94] [emoji725]

Not really. There has to be something better for both of us.

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

@AgNoStiC MuSliM @waz

is praising a terrorist attack permitted?

Iran doesn't consider kashmiri freedom fighters as terrorits. This was a freedom fighter attack not terrorist attack in iranian saudi turkey chinese and pakistani books

 

[M. Sarmad]

No need I guess, until and unless no one has legally demanded India nor initiated any litigation in any of the International courts for non compliance even after long 70 years speaks for itself.

• Kashmir still remains on the agenda of UNSC as an unresolved international dispute.
• UNMOGIP is still present in India and Pakistan. the UN refuses to terminate it despite repeated Indian requests.
• The UN Resolutions on Kashmir will remain valid regardless of when they were adopted.

 

[pahadi]

You are not providing us anything , Kashmir was never yours to begin with .. It was a disputed land ,and an unfinished business in S.Asia .

As i said in my earlier post, senseless killing will not help nor stop the violence .

We will give you kashmir, but for that all the rivers flowing through it must dry up, do what ever you want to do afterwards...

 

[Jackdaws]

But they remain the only mutually agreed upon means to resolve the dispute - the government of India committed to them multiple times before eventually reneging on them. They also remain the only moral and just solution to resolve a conflict and dispute over territory - allow the people that belong to the land of J&K to determine freely which country they wish to be a part of. As the self-proclaimed world's largest democracy, India, of all countries, should respect this means of dispute resolution.

Is Spain letting the Catalans have Catalonia? And this in that champion of human rights - the EU. Last I checked the separatist leaders were being tried.

So India is not going to allow any part to secede.

 

[Mustang06]

Referendum is the only option.[emoji94] [emoji725]

Isn't this dog dead?

 

[Chhatrapati]

RIP brave men. Every drop of your blood will be avenged.

Draw a conclusion from how many Indians cheered when there was a Terrorist attack in Pakistan where Pak soldiers are killed vs this thread. You get the general mentality of Pakistanis and Indians.
Learned a lot today.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Jaish is based in Pak.

Pak and its ally China have shielded Jaish from being declared a terror organization.

There is no occupying force.

• The alleged perpetrator was a young man from the Indian Occupied Kashmir
• Jaish has been banned in Pakistan since 2002
• Indian troops in Kashmir are indeed "Occupation forces".

 

[Champion_Usmani]

Soura Srinaga, Kashmiris celeberating attack on CRPF- 42 soldiers dead 2019