What's new

Once you’re Pakistani, there is no going back to India

I see you are having a mental seizure...I heard Indian doctors are good.....maybe yous should see one coz your denial problem now denied you from refraining to quote me
LOL... this is what you can come up with when you don't have any argument..
is anyone not allowed?
Yeah, foreiners.. they are issued something called visa, with curtailed rights. OMG!! Discrimination!! The horror!! Indignity!!!
I never talked about racial discrimination......And everyone is entitled to being treated fairly...who so says otherwise is in fact discriminating already!
Did you read the definition? Racial discrimination includes gender/nationality/color and so on which is the legal term. The definition you are using is plain english, which includes discrimination between right and wrong (OMG!!! That should be bad... you should not discriminate!!!).. trying some wordplay.. again, when you don't have an argument, you must go for this kind of circus...
And sicne they have American citizen means they fall under the law....otherwise would have been in the exception group...
A law that states it is not applicable in other nations, like India.. When they apply for Indian visa, they are subjecting themselves to Indian laws, not US..
World agrees with you discriminating 1 nationality? Based on 1 of their dual nationality?
Wow does that denial rate make you feel better and sleep better at night?

Citizenship is the common thread that connects all Americans. We are a nation bound not by race or religion, but by the shared values of freedom, liberty, and equality.


Rights

  • Freedom to express yourself.

  • Freedom to worship as you wish.

  • Right to a prompt, fair trial by jury.

  • Right to vote in elections for public officials.

  • Right to apply for federal employment requiring U.S. citizenship.

  • Right to run for elected office.

  • Freedom to pursue “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

Citizenship Rights and Responsibilities | USCIS

I dont know why indians whine and call the other whining...

Request Rejected

Citizenship in the United States, being a citizen, is a status that entails specific rights, duties and benefits. Citizenship is understood as a "right to have rights" since it serves as a foundation for a bundle of subsequent rights, such as the right to live and work in the United States and to receive federal assistance.

1 nation/2 nations/100 nations, number doesn't matter. You can't apply same restrictive rule to 100 nations just because 1 nation is creating issue. That is what "reasonable restriction" means. Heh? who said they can't whine? Nobody is telling US-pak citizens must not whine.. they can do it by all means. They can ask for federal assistance (they did, but govt shooed them away). But that doesn't make India's policies discriminatory...
And you came back to "you are in denial" circle again. Sorry to say, but you are in denial (or pretending to be in).. something doesn't become "discrimination" just because you say so...
It is also quite funny you quote "Right to have rights".. it means, until you have those rights, nothing done against you is "discriminatory". That is, in US I can't vote, because I do not have right to vote (non-citizen). That is still selection based on national origin but not discriminatory as I do not have the right to vote in the first place. Same thing to dual nationals. They do not have the right to US/UK nationality (as per Indian laws) hence no discrimination if they are considered pakistani nationals (UN says right to "a" nationality, not right to whichever nationality you decide). I know I am repeating this for nth time now, but just curious to know when will you be able to grasp this simple concept.. I mean, it is not hard as 2+2 you know..
 
screenshot_406.png
 
firstly, it is best not to jump to conclusions...secondly, my religion doesnt tell me to judge a whole group based on a few


I didnt reap nothing so I dont know why I should sow it!

Dont quote me with your spewing ignorant hatred I want nothing to do with it! Coz that is you alone and your responsibility as an individual of how you deal with individuals!
I m not judging entire group or ppl but India need to be very very vigilant or alert in the backdrop of state sponsored terrorism(some time Pakistan defensively call it acts of non state actors) which eventually bracketed all the Pakistanis with scums like David headly ....
You reap what you sow was meant for Pakistan n its ppl as a whole(Pakistan n its ppl bleeding because of persuasion of terrorism as state policy in past) not for individual level....
 
Same copy paste in another thread..here is the same answer, should I do the same with what Sikh think about India and Khalistan, an idiot delusional Indian would achieve nothing here.

I m not judging entire group or ppl but India need to be very very vigilant or alert in the backdrop of state sponsored terrorism(some time Pakistan defensively call it acts of non state actors) which eventually bracketed all the Pakistanis with scums like David headly ....
You reap what you sow was meant for Pakistan n its ppl as a whole(Pakistan n its ppl bleeding because of persuasion of terrorism as state policy in past) not for individual level....
You get what you deserve, a comment by a chootia Indian like one billion other chootia Indians can't come up with anything else, this is a pakistani forum. People from gay hind are not welcome here.
 
Here's why the U.S. for all its talk, doesn't really give a damn. They pretty much proposed the same thing to the U.K. in 2007 before deciding on shared intelligence on British Pakistanis.....

U.S. Seeks Closing of Visa Loophole for Britons

Published: May 2, 2007
LONDON, May 1 — Omar Khyam, the ringleader of the thwarted London bomb plot who was sentenced to life imprisonment on Monday, showed the potential for disaffected young men to be lured as terrorists, a threat that British officials said they would have to contend with for a generation.

But the 25-year-old Mr. Khyam, a Briton of Pakistani descent, also personifies a larger and more immediate concern: as a British citizen, he could have entered the United States without a visa, like many of an estimated 800,000 other Britons of Pakistani origin.

American officials, citing the number of terror plots in Britain involving Britons with ties to Pakistan, expressed concern over the visa loophole. In recent months, the homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, has opened talks with the government here on how to curb the access of British citizens of Pakistani origin to the United States.

At the moment, the British are resistant, fearing that restrictions on the group of Britons would incur a backlash from a population that has always sided with the Labor Party. The Americans say they are hesitant to push too hard and embarrass their staunch ally in the Iraq war, Prime Minister Tony Blair, as he prepares to step down from office.

Among the options that have been put on the table, according to British officials, was the most onerous option to Britain, that of canceling the entire visa waiver program that allows all Britons entry to the United States without a visa. Another option, politically fraught as it is, would be to single out Britons of Pakistani origin, requiring them to make visa applications for the United States.

Rather than impose any visa restrictions, the British government has told Washington it would prefer if the Americans simply deported Britons who failed screening once they arrived at an airport in the United States, British officials said. The British also screen at their end, and share intelligence with the Americans.........

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/02/world/europe/02britain.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom