OIC Peace Keeping Force for maintaining peace in majority Muslim countries

[kalu_miah]

So much for neutrality

When the OP of this thread doesn't like Shias and at the same time suggests a solution for 'peacekeeping' in Muslim countries well no offense, but it's more like a joke. Why don't you suggest this 'peacekeeping' forces also launch hit and run attacks on Shias? It will indeed empower the peace.

OIC is a joke, and it's function is a useful as the 'Democratic People's Republic' in North Korea.

Would you say the same about Shias in Saudi Arabia or Alawites and Christians in Syria (in case Assad falls), or Shias Kuwait? Believe me, they will be more than happy with a separate state.

Peacekeeping forces will not need to make hit and run attack on anyone, if they are attacked by anyone, they will eliminate that specific threat, regardless of their religious or sect affiliation.

Why don't Iran join the peacekeeping force? You are a member of OIC and are more than welcome to contribute for the cause of peace.

As for Shia's of Saudi Arabia, Alawite and Christians in Syria (in a post-Asad era) and Shia's in Kuwait and Bahrain, if they are being killed in large numbers in a failed state, then OICPKF should intervene. But other than Syria, none of the other GCC states you mentioned are failed states where ongoing conflict is killing large numbers of people.

OICPKF will protect all groups of people, including Shia's from getting killed by sectarian revenge attacks.

 

[rubyjackass]

Palestine,IOK,myanmar etc........ OIC? not to be seen anywhere in the picture.

That is the next stage of kalu_miah's plan. Once OICPKF gains experience by keeping peace in troubled countries where fighting factions are muslims, then it will start fighting on behalf of muslims against non-muslims.

 

[Serpentine]

Nice one u iranians have learned from ur american friends, if u can't argue start calling it a conspiracy. Who made u the mod anyways. And for the shias of kuwait getting a separate state, u iranians are funny. After all of this u still want the Sunnis to believe that u r not busy steering up violence on ethnic lines by using ur proxies in the Muslim countries.

You better read the post that I quoted.Your friend was suggesting that Sunnis in Iraq establish a separate state and I said if he wants it for Iraq, he should want it for other countries too.
Indeed your post was a conspiracy theory, because Iran is sacrificing enough from standing up against west and U.S. It's really funny, SA, Qatar,Kuwait,Bahrain and Jordan are closest U.S allies in region, and you are saying Iran,U.S and Jews are behind the curtains?Give me a good reason not to call it a conspiracy, and a weak one too.

Peacekeeping forces will not need to make hit and run attack on anyone, if they are attacked by anyone, they will eliminate that specific threat, regardless of their religious or sect affiliation.

Why don't Iran join the peacekeeping force? You are a member of OIC and are more than welcome to contribute for the cause of peace.

As for Shia's of Saudi Arabia, Alawite and Christians in Syria (in a post-Asad era) and Shia's in Kuwait and Bahrain, if they are being killed in large numbers in a failed state, then OICPKF should intervene. But other than Syria, none of the other GCC states you mentioned are failed states where ongoing conflict is killing large numbers of people.

OICPKF will protect all groups of people, including Shia's from getting killed by sectarian revenge attacks.

What about Iraq? Are Sunnis being massacred there in large numbers too? Then why did you suggest a separate state in Anbar?Give me a good reason.

 

[kalu_miah]

That is the next stage of kalu_miah's plan. Once OICPKF gains experience by keeping peace in troubled countries where fighting factions are muslims, then it will start fighting on behalf of muslims against non-muslims.

I have already answered this post before:
IOK, Myanmar are not majority Muslim states or OIC member states. Palestine is not even a state.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...ajority-muslim-countries-2.html#ixzz2ZLzjUr6h

Here is a quote from OP:
- OICPKF will be deployed in majority Muslim countries, whenever there is a breakdown in state function and a peacekeeping force is needed to enforce peace among multiple fighting sides

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...-majority-muslim-countries.html#ixzz2ZM03mNzL

 

[BDforever]

I have already answered this post before:
IOK, Myanmar are not majority Muslim states or OIC member states. Palestine is not even a state.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...ajority-muslim-countries-2.html#ixzz2ZLzjUr6h

Here is a quote from OP:
- OICPKF will be deployed in majority Muslim countries, whenever there is a breakdown in state function and a peacekeeping force is needed to enforce peace among multiple fighting sides

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...-majority-muslim-countries.html#ixzz2ZM03mNzL

so muslim minorities are licensed to be killed ? good logic

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

I see what you're getting at Aero, there some reasons that I don't want to share but I will give an example,

How would you feel if a member of the IOC is saying the fallowing or something similar " From the birth to Islam Meeca and Madina were under control of Muslims, but in the last two centuries there has been an evil who darkened the holiness of these holy cities " How nice is it? That took place in Indonesia a few years ago.

I'm a %100 sure that you condemn such remarks, well, that's what the Pakistan delegation did, and this isn't something new from Pakistan, your country was the co-founder of the IOC.

But seriously man, you guys have the HQ of the 2nd largest organization in the world. Its record stinks, it doesn't even speak now a days. Its a dead meat!

 

[rubyjackass]

I have already answered this post before:
IOK, Myanmar are not majority Muslim states or OIC member states. Palestine is not even a state.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...ajority-muslim-countries-2.html#ixzz2ZLzjUr6h

Here is a quote from OP:
- OICPKF will be deployed in majority Muslim countries, whenever there is a breakdown in state function and a peacekeeping force is needed to enforce peace among multiple fighting sides

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/middle...-majority-muslim-countries.html#ixzz2ZM03mNzL

I was just saying that it is only a logical next step. Is it not?

And FYI peace keeping is an unenviable job. Ask the Pakistanis who are dying in Uganda in the hands of rebels. Everybody in the conflict country hates a peacekeeping force.

 

[Doritos11]

Nice one u iranians have learned from ur american friends, if u can't argue start calling it a conspiracy. Who made u the mod anyways. And for the shias of kuwait getting a separate state, u iranians are funny. After all of this u still want the Sunnis to believe that u r not busy steering up violence on ethnic lines by using ur proxies in the Muslim countries.

Ye but ur also funny dude, your calling Iraq and Syria a proxy while Kuwait.. 22 years ago the US had to put the Kuwaiti emir back in power, 15.000 US soldiers still stay in Kuwait to keep it under control.
Can’t you accept the truth ? We show facts, but no.. you prefer to draw an image based on preference and propaganda.

 

[kalu_miah]

What about Iraq? Are Sunnis being massacred there in large numbers too? Then why did you suggest a separate state in Anbar?Give me a good reason.

The sectarian civil war in Iraq started after the fall of Saddam with the US invasion. The US helped the Shia side crush the Sunni dominated Bath, while the Sunni's went underground with their resistance in an insurgency war. Hundreds of thousands were cleansed from their old neighborhoods. More than a million people died in this sectarian civil war since 2003:
ZCommunications | More than 1,000,000 Iraqis murdered since 2003 invasion by Orb | ZNet Article

Currently there is a lull in these killings as the Shia dominated Maliki govt. has established a relative peaceful period. I think it is only temporary, as the action moved from Iraq to Syria. Once Syria situation is settled, the situation will again deteriorate in Iraq.

So the situation in Iraq is very much up in the air. In fact I would say the same for Lebanon, as Syria was the stabilizer in Lebanon, as Iran's proxy in the region. As soon as Syria falls as Iran's proxy, Lebanon will get destabilized.

 

[Doritos11]

^^ actually the Syrian conflict has raised attacks, thanks to Jahbat al Nusra which is al qaeda.
The US left us with a weak army and no air capabilities, now that it is taking shape security will improve.

 

[kalu_miah]

I was just saying that it is only a logical next step. Is it not?

And FYI peace keeping is an unenviable job. Ask the Pakistanis who are dying in Uganda in the hands of rebels. Everybody in the conflict country hates a peacekeeping force.

The answer is an emphatic NO. OIC mandate do not extend to non-member states. They can raise these issues of Muslim minorities to other relevant authorities like UN. Besides most of these states with Muslim minorities are functioning states, so "peace keeping" is out of the question, even by UNPKF. But if there is such a failed state where Muslim minorities are being killed in large numbers, then that will be responsibility of UN or other regional bodies and their peace keeping forces, not OICPKF.

 

[Doritos11]

What is this peace keeping force going to do anyway.

In Syria they would have to choose sides or stay out of it completely.
In Iraq what are they going to do ?.. theres nothing for them to do besides standing @ checkpoints which is not needed.
In Afghanistan they can do the work that the UAE troops are doing ( humanitarian ), this could be the only good 1 << + securing the Lebanse borders from Syrian spillover.

 

[Arabian Legend]

Interesting post as always @kalu_miah allow me to disagree with you on one thing and that is Iran. One rotten apple spoils the whole basket. In fact Iran should be expelled from the OIC as a whole. I will elaborate on that if you insist.

Also, establishing this idea requires self reliance on all levels especially military industry, arms manufacturing, and technological development. From a political prospective, the creation of the OICPKF might lead to some tension with the non Muslim world and that should be taken into account.

speaking of the economy, I think we have the advantages..

 

[Rank]

OIC is actually OH I SEEE!

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

OIC is a disgrace