What's new

Oh really ?

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Hiroshima urges end of nuclear umbrella
Hiroshima urges end of nuclear umbrella | The Japan Times Online

At a memorial ceremony attended for the first time ever by a U.N. secretary general and a U.S. representative, Hiroshima on Friday marked the 65th anniversary of its atomic bombing by calling on Japan to withdraw from the U.S. nuclear umbrella and accelerate the progress made over the past 18 months to eliminate nuclear arms.

The reason why Japan wants the US Nuke Umbrella removed is so that Japan can come up with excuses in the future to build her own nukes.

The excuses would be :

1. North Korea armed with nukes is a threat to Japan.
2. China is armed with nukes is also a threat to Japan.


LOL.
 
.
right said hafizz..we used the same excuse to develop our nukes.
 
.
The reason why Japan wants the US Nuke Umbrella removed is so that Japan can come up with excuses in the future to build her own nukes.

The excuses would be :

1. North Korea armed with nukes is a threat to Japan.
2. China is armed with nukes is also a threat to Japan.


LOL.

Just assuming that what you say is true, exactly what is so hilarious about it? Obviously China is a threat to Japan. Given their history,it can't be otherwise. Reason for opting for its own nukes could be that the US umbrella does not provide Japan with as much reassurance as it has over the decades any longer. North Korea? they are a threat to all humanity, themselves the most.
 
.
Just assuming that what you say is true, exactly what is so hilarious about it? Obviously China is a threat to Japan. Given their history,it can't be otherwise. Reason for opting for its own nukes could be that the US umbrella does not provide Japan with as much reassurance as it has over the decades any longer. North Korea? they are a threat to all humanity, themselves the most.

Of course China is a threat to Japan. China has invaded Japan so many times. I don't even have enough fingers to count how many times Japan have been invaded and raped by China.
 
.
Of course China is a threat to Japan. China has invaded Japan so many times. I don't even have enough fingers to count how many times Japan have been invaded and raped by China.

Same logic could be applied to Pakistan as well. India never attacked Pakistan unprovoked. Then what is the need for Pakistan to have nuclear weapons? How are you going to justify that?
 
.
Same logic could be applied to Pakistan as well. India never attacked Pakistan unprovoked. Then what is the need for Pakistan to have nuclear weapons? How are you going to justify that?

Of course India did attack Pakistan many times in the past but not they were small scale attacks. India would not dare launch a full scale attack Pakistan because an attack on Pakistan is an attack on China.

India Attack Pakistan Nuclear Sites
India Attack Pakistan Nuclear Sites

The Indians working with their allies in the Karzai government have designed a foolproof plan to attack Pakistani nuclear sites using hired terrorists. They think they can pull it off and permanently damage Pakistan’s standing internationally and hasten calls for denuclearizing Pakistan. Any attack on Pakistani nuclear sites in the coming days will be taken as a declaration of war by India and will be dealt with equal force. There should not be confusion on this.

India has paid terrorist leader Baitullah Mehsud and his well armed and trained terrorist army around U.S. $ 25 million to mount a spectacular attack on a major Pakistani nuclear site. A special force of around 500 recruits has been assembled and trained to mount the operation that is supposed to shock the world. The purpose is to create an event that will create a global media scare and convince the world of the need for military intervention in Pakistan. Another objective is to neutralize voices of reason within the U.S. government that believe Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is secure.

The bulk of the terrorists in the special 500-strong force put together by Mehsud have been trained inside Afghanistan by trainers suspected of having links to the Indian intelligence. Although most of the recruits are expected to be Pakistanis from Mehsud’s tribe, an unknown number of Afghan and Indian elements with special operations training have been inserted in the Mehsud group in order to ensure the success of this high profile operation.

It is not clear when this plan was conceived and whether the 500-strong force divided into crack teams to carry out the attack(s) is ready. But Pakistani officials are taking no chances. The nation’s security setup is on high alert. As for the nuclear installations, the managers of Pakistan’s strategic arsenal maintain unrestricted universal operability to fulfill the arsenal’s role as a deterrent. For them, no day is a normal day.

But this latest disclosure of a plan to attack the nuclear sites has raised alarm bells, to say the least.

A rough sketch of the plan and how the attack(s) are expected to unfold goes as follows:

1. A team or several teams of terrorists attack one or more Pakistani nuclear sites and attempt to enter the facilities.

2. Within each crack team only a small core is supposed to be equipped with modern communications equipment, special operations gear, and modern weapons; highly trained to exact maximum damage.

3. Where possible, the terrorists plan to break in and hold the fort, a la Mumbai attacks, in order to generate maximum media coverage and embarrassment for the Pakistanis.

4. The international media, and especially the main American and British news outlets, turn this into a global crisis, comparable to the Bay of Pigs in 1962.

5. The event generates enough pressure to justify an ‘international demand’ to neutralize Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and force Pakistanis to accept ‘international’ supervision.

6. Depending on the aftermath, and after a few days or weeks, a small nuclear weapon is used somewhere, maybe against the US military or NATO bases in Afghanistan since it would be difficult to do it anywhere else, in order to confirm that the Afghan Taliban or generally the ‘Islamic extremists’ managed to steal a weapon from the earlier attack(s) on Pakistani sites.

This last point is critical. According to the available information, the mysterious disappearance of a senior Indian nuclear scientist and his subsequent death in May is linked to at least some parts of this plan. The scientist, Mr. Lokanathan Mahalingam, 47, had access to Indian’s sensitive nuclear information and worked at the prestigious Kaiga Atomic Power Station in the southern Indian state Karnataka, close to Project Seabird, a major Indian military base. His disappearance received limited coverage in the Indian media and there was almost a blackout on the circumstances surrounding how his dead body was found in a lake. The media in the U.S. and Britain also ignored the story. It is believed that Mr. Mahalingam was either involved in or had some knowledge about the planning for securing a small nuclear weapon that would leave no fingerprints, to put it this way, in order to execute the idea in paragraph 6 above.

The Indians have been working on this scenario for some time now.

On 16 May, the Israeli security website Debka under a story titled, ‘Singh warns Obama: Pakistan is lost,’ reported the following:

“India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has told President Obama that nuclear sites in Pakistan’s restive frontier province are “already partly” in the hands of Islamic extremists.”

The Times of India, reporting the story, complained about “Washington’s misplaced confidence in, and [careless] approach towards, Pakistan’s nuclear assets,” and grumbled that “Pakistan is ramping up its nuclear arsenal even as the rest of the world is scaling it down.”

The Indian interest is obvious. But so is the Israeli interest. It is quite revealing that the story was broken by a news outlet known in international circles for its links to the Israeli government.

Official circles in Washington, including the White House, the State Department, Pentagon and CIA are cognizant of a history of cooperation between India and Israel in security issues. India’s security establishment is largely focused on Pakistan and on controlling Kashmir where the population is fighting the Indian military. At least in one incident, during the limited Pakistan-India war in 1999, the Israelis directly intervened to help the battered Indian army overturn a tactical victory by Pakistani and Kashmiri fighters.

As recently as two days ago, Bruce Riedel, a former CIA analyst and an Obama adviser known for his strong anti-Pakistan views, wrote an article published at the Brookings Institute website that demonstrates how far the anti-Pakistan lobby is willing to go to prove that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is not safe.

In Mr. Riedel’s case, he went as far as lying.

He used a recent terrorist attack on a bus carrying employees of KRL, a Pakistani nuclear facility, to say that Pakistani nuclear sites are already under attack. What he conveniently ignored is that the said bus was in fact traveling through a densely populated part of the city and not anywhere near any nuclear site. The bus most probably became a target of opportunity because it carried a plate indicating it was a government vehicle.

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s statement quoted by an Israeli source which was widely reported and never denied by the Indians, the Israelis or the Americans, was not the first to promote the alarmist and the unreal scenario of Pakistani nuclear weapons getting into the wrong hands. Mr. Singh came on record during an interview with CNN in 2005 to say this:

“I am worried about the security of Pakistan’s nuclear assets should President Pervez Musharraf be replaced, since there is always the danger of Islamic militants seizing power and taking control of the country’s nuclear assets.”

There is little question that influential parts of the Indian government are involved in exporting terrorism into Pakistan from bases inside Afghanistan. Attempts to incite ethnic unrest in Pakistan’s southwest were traced by investigators to Indians in Afghanistan. Pakistani investigators reached the same conclusion with some of the evidence found in northwest Pakistan where terrorists are killing Pakistanis. And now there are reports of an impending attack on Pakistan’s nuclear facilities using Baitullah Mehsud.

The Indians and those who are supporting them should be under no illusions. Any attack on Pakistani nuclear facilities in the coming days will be construed as a declaration of war by India against Pakistan. Knowing of Mehsud’s previous contacts with Indians and with Karzai’s people, any miscalculated attempt by his terrorists will not be seen as anything less than a direct Indian attack. In this case, Pakistan will consider itself in a state of war, and retaliate accordingly. There should not be any confusion on this.
 
Last edited:
.
Of course China is a threat to Japan. China has invaded Japan so many times. I don't even have enough fingers to count how many times Japan have been invaded and raped by China.

Of course India did attack Pakistan many times in the past but not they were small scale attacks. India would not dare launch a full scale attack Pakistan because an attack on Pakistan is an attack on China.



:what:
:toast_sign:
 
.
Of course India did attack Pakistan many times in the past but not they were small scale attacks. India would not dare launch a full scale attack Pakistan because an attack on Pakistan is an attack on China.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:attack on india will be attack on israel,russia,u.s,britain,france:rofl::rofl:
 
.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:attack on india will be attack on israel,russia,u.s,britain,france:rofl::rofl:

"an attack on India would be an attack on nobody"....ha ha ha

Didn't China attack(taught india a lesson) India back in 1962 ????

Pakistan can also attack India but it is not worth wasting time because India is not important to Pakistan....
 
. .
"an attack on India would be an attack on nobody"....ha ha ha

Didn't China attack(taught india a lesson) India back in 1962 ????

Pakistan can also attack India but it is not worth wasting time because India is not important to Pakistan....

Hope you can make your army and ISI to believe that, it will save both of us lots of lives and money!!
 
.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:attack on india will be attack on israel,russia,u.s,britain,france:rofl::rofl:
India is not the center of the world. Just today obama admins has annoced how it is going to throw out your valuable talent off the US soil and restrict future outsourcing to "efficient" indians.
 
.
"an attack on India would be an attack on nobody"....ha ha ha

Didn't China attack(taught india a lesson) India back in 1962 ????

Pakistan can also attack India but it is not worth wasting time because India is not important to Pakistan....

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
again
 
.
India is not the center of the world. Just today obama admins has annoced how it is going to throw out your valuable talent off the US soil and restrict future outsourcing to "efficient" indians.

let c,u.s outsource 60% of the i-t market frm abroad.
u know y coz they dont have so much resources
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom